Article

2005-11-28 Europe

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve 2005-11-28 08:35|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Arab delegates object to a proposed definition that would allow no exceptions for those fighting occupation.
Osama considers our workers in Saudi Arabia as being an occupation. Is this the EU's version definition as well? If so, are we occupied by Arab imagrants

Posted by plainslow 2005-11-28 09:33|| 2005-11-28 09:33|| Front Page Top

#2 A summit of EU nations and their Mediterranean neighbours is said to be struggling to agree a definition of terrorism and how to combat it.

When a terrorist reads this all he sees are the words, "low hanging fruit."

Posted by Zenster 2005-11-28 11:28|| 2005-11-28 11:28|| Front Page Top

#3 Arab delegates object to a proposed definition that would allow no exceptions for those fighting occupation.

Does that mean that if Soudanese, Kurds and Berbers sytart killing Arabs it will not be terrorism?

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-11-28 12:33|| 2005-11-28 12:33|| Front Page Top

#4 And Rome should march on ~~Istanbul~~ Constantinople, too. Just to be fair, heh.

Posted by .com 2005-11-28 12:38|| 2005-11-28 12:38|| Front Page Top

23:56 Aris Katsaris
23:13 Bomb-a-rama
23:06 Frank G
22:50 Grunter
22:37 Red Dog
22:32 DMFD
22:13 JosephMendiola
22:05 JosephMendiola
22:05 2b
22:05 Frank G
22:03 JosephMendiola
21:59 2b
21:57 2b
21:56 JosephMendiola
21:51 2b
21:46 Zenster
21:45 Dragonscale
21:42 Frank G
21:33 Whuse Angoluns5118
21:24 Phinelet Glager1865
21:21 anymouse
21:18 Robert Crawford
21:17 Glenmore
21:12 Red Dog