Article

2005-09-07 Iraq-Jordan

Capture near the Syrian border ties Zark to 7/7

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-09-07 01:35|| || Front Page|| [11129 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I would guess that this news will be quickly retracted.

Posted by Rory B. Bellows 2005-09-07 01:51|| 2005-09-07 01:51|| Front Page Top

#2 WHY WOULD IT BE RETRACTED?????

Posted by ARMYGUY 2005-09-07 08:14|| 2005-09-07 08:14|| Front Page Top

#3 I believe he means by the MSM. It doesn't fit their meme that the London boomers were just poor innocent boys outraged by George Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq.

Posted by Steve">Steve 2005-09-07 08:30|| 2005-09-07 08:30|| Front Page Top

#4 Story probably won't be retracted as it is from the Washington Times...not WaPo, NYT-National Inquirer, LAT, or The Globe (er, I mean The Boston Globe).

Posted by anymouse">anymouse 2005-09-07 10:01|| 2005-09-07 10:01|| Front Page Top

#5 Please don't shout, ArmyGuy. My eyes are feeling a bit sensitive today. Thanks!

Posted by trailing wife 2005-09-07 10:48|| 2005-09-07 10:48|| Front Page Top

#6 Why do they keep evidence in the first place?

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-09-07 12:29|| 2005-09-07 12:29|| Front Page Top

#7 Because they don't have centralized info store. The guy was probably moving it between cadres.

Posted by lotp 2005-09-07 14:30|| 2005-09-07 14:30|| Front Page Top

#8 SandalNet.

Posted by Jackal">Jackal 2005-09-07 15:14|| home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html] 2005-09-07 15:14|| Front Page Top

#9 Because the Bush admin. and the Blair governement are not eager to link Saddam Hussein with al Qaeda in any way. This includes 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings. (And for that matter the 3/11 bombings.) There is so much evidence to support such a case that official suppression is the only plausible explanation.

Saddam was hip deep in 9/11 and alot of other al Qaeda terrorist attacks. That's why we are in Iraq. But our political leadership prefers to remain ambiguous. Governemnts act really funny when weapons of mass destruction are involved in a given equation.

Posted by Rory B. Bellows 2005-09-07 16:53|| 2005-09-07 16:53|| Front Page Top

#10 I understand moving new info around by why would you have old info? What is the value? I would think they can do post-mordem on the operation from the news.

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-09-07 18:54|| 2005-09-07 18:54|| Front Page Top

23:53 Jan
23:51 JosephMendiola
23:51 RWV
23:46 JosephMendiola
23:45 Red Dog
23:43 RWV
23:39 Frank G
23:39 Alaska Paul
23:38 JosephMendiola
23:32 RWV
23:32 Jan
23:28 Frank G
23:27 Red Dog
23:25 CrazyFool
23:22 Red Dog
23:20 RWV
23:19 CrazyFool
23:14 JosephMendiola
23:12 mojo
23:07 DMFD
23:05 Jan
23:03 Bomb-a-rama
22:59 CrazyFool
22:55 Anonymoose