Article

2004-12-22 Afghanistan/South Asia

Nepal king to seek Indian help to crush Maoists

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2004-12-22 00:00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 How a'mighty FASCIST, again, of these Communists! The Commies want neutral INDIA cuz they need manpower, aka "numbers" and "quantities", sub aka CANNON FODDER, ags the modern, Western, and democratic worlds. Communism > UNJUSTLY ENRICHED GOVERNMENTIST WARLORDIC PROFITEERING ELITES ordering and sacrificing the PREMANENTLY POOR AND ALWAYS EXPENDABLE MASSES to PC suffer and die in the name of their masters, the slave state, and the permanent, perennial status quo.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2004-12-22 1:28:25 AM|| [http://n/a] 2004-12-22 1:28:25 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 I do not get it, Joe. Slow down. Type clearly. Cut the friggin' CAPS and say what you want to say conversationally - without abbreviations or any of your private notations, please.

Otherwise, you may as well not post because nobody's following all of your comments. Bits here and there are intelligible, but not enough to get the whole of your message.

Relax and talk - I'm curious to hear what you're saying - I just don't speak your lingo, I'm afraid.

Posted by .com 2004-12-22 2:51:15 AM|| 2004-12-22 2:51:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Let me give it a shot at the translation:

How all mighty fascist, again, of these Communists! The Commies want neutral India 'cause they need manpower, a.k.a. "numbers" and "quantities", [sub?] a.k.a. cannon fodder, against the modern, Western, and democratic worlds. Communism = unjustly enriched [governmentist?] warlord-like profiteering elites, ordering and sacrificing the permanently poor and always expendable masses to [PC?] suffer and die in the name of their masters, the slave state, and the permanent, perennial status quo.

Am I even close, Joe?

Posted by Rafael 2004-12-22 3:11:10 AM|| 2004-12-22 3:11:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 You're a brave man Rafael.

Posted by Shipman 2004-12-22 9:30:23 AM|| 2004-12-22 9:30:23 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 And a fine psychoanalyst too.

Posted by Tom 2004-12-22 9:40:16 AM|| 2004-12-22 9:40:16 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Airplane: "Can I help? I speak Jive"

Posted by Frank G 2004-12-22 9:46:06 AM|| 2004-12-22 9:46:06 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 No mention of Hillary, Joe? C'mon, she's gotta be in on this.

Posted by tu3031 2004-12-22 1:04:22 PM|| 2004-12-22 1:04:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 I'd score this except I have a soft spot for CapLock Joe and fear he may be of the large persuashun.

Still, a man's gotta do...

6.8
Points off for no OWG.
Points off for no Big Boy Restaurant Chains.

Points awarded for: PREMANENTLY POOR AND ALWAYS EXPENDABLE MASSES

Posted by Shipman 2004-12-22 2:11:24 PM|| 2004-12-22 2:11:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 The Commies want neutral India 'cause they need manpower, a.k.a. "numbers" and "quantities", [sub?] a.k.a. cannon fodder, against the modern, Western, and democratic worlds.

Strange, I thought the Maoists were gaining power in India.

Posted by Pappy 2004-12-22 3:29:51 PM|| 2004-12-22 3:29:51 PM|| Front Page Top

00:03 Pappy
23:47 Pappy
23:42 Rafael
23:12 Frank G
23:03 jn1
22:56 Stephen
22:56 Frank G
22:48 badanov
22:29 Atomic Conspiracy
22:14 badanov
22:12 Zhang Fei
21:26 Phil Fraering
21:07 True German Ally
20:43 Mark Z.
20:42 Silentbrick
20:22 Anonymous4724
20:16 Barbara Skolaut
20:09 Barbara Skolaut
20:03 Barbara Skolaut
19:51 Bomb-a-rama
19:42 Bomb-a-rama
19:28 Bomb-a-rama
19:27 Radio Guy
19:26 Radio Guy