Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 11/06/2004 View Fri 11/05/2004 View Thu 11/04/2004 View Wed 11/03/2004 View Tue 11/02/2004 View Mon 11/01/2004 View Sun 10/31/2004
1
2004-11-06 Afghanistan/South Asia
Jihad is not terrorism: Qazi
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Zenster 2004-11-06 8:39:46 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 I think he means just-us.
Posted by raptor 2004-11-07 8:43:46 PM||   2004-11-07 8:43:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 At least we're in good company in the axis of anti-terror.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-11-07 8:44:18 PM||   2004-11-07 8:44:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 we need to call him on this - I'm thinking we take our "terrorism" to his fat forehead with a bullet
Posted by Frank G 2004-11-07 8:44:43 PM||   2004-11-07 8:44:43 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Jihad isn't terroism. Jihadies are the enemy. Terroism is the tactic that jihadies use to kill people. Jihad is the call to arms for the fake religion of islam. It must have a cut-throat arm or it will lose its hold on the folks.

I think the islamic jihad should be classfied as a Nazi, Communist, or voodoo screed and challenged to a smack down.

What I fear is our Constitution being used as an easy allibi for jihad, under freedom of religion regs, Any religion that has jihad as a tenent must not be allowed to be classified as a religion. Nope, it's political and therefore not subject to suicide regs.

So simple but so little understood.
Posted by Lucky 2004-11-07 8:45:12 PM||   2004-11-07 8:45:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Hear! Hear Lucky!
Posted by Shipman 2004-11-07 8:45:36 PM||   2004-11-07 8:45:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Jihad is not terrorism: Qazi

Have it your way, Qazi. Oh, and just for the record, we won't kill you, it'll merely be "sanctioning with extreme prejudice."

PS: Another vote for making such a distinction, Lucky. Only when Islam detaches itself from all political ambitions should it be allowed back into the revival tent.
Posted by Zenster 2004-11-07 8:46:08 PM||   2004-11-07 8:46:08 PM|| Front Page Top

04:28 irt profecy
22:45 ed
22:44 Darth VAda
22:43 phil_b
22:42 Mrs. Davis
22:41 SteveS
22:41 phil_b
22:40 Kalle (kafir forever)
22:39 Shipman
22:38 Mrs. Davis
22:38 Conanista
22:37 Crinerong Chomoque9551
22:37 .com
22:36 MacNails
22:36 mom
22:35 phil_b
22:34 Constitutional Individualist
22:34 leo88
22:33 Mark Espinola
22:33 Shipman
22:32 tu3031
22:32 Jarhead
22:31 98zulu
22:31 Stephen









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com