Article

2004-06-11 Iraq-Jordan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2004-06-11 12:28:30 AM|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 For me this is simple...take over Switzerland. This is where the money is. This little piece of dung country has been given way to much rope. Have the Swiss cough up the 120 billion or pay in other ways...This so called neutral country that plays both sides of the fence needs to play on one side or be eliminated.

Posted by Long Hair Republican 2004-06-11 2:03:09 AM|| 2004-06-11 2:03:09 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Good point, #1. Switzerland should be compelled to open the books on Uncle Saddam and company. It's nonsensical that in this day and age of terrorism that Switzerland should be allowed to keep in good faith the privacy rights of terrorist regimes like Saddam and his Baathist thugs. If Switzerland wants to play with the bad boys of the world, they should lose their seat in the UN[big loss, I know, don't laugh,Switzerland probably would see membership in the UN as valuable, argh]

2. the other point that's been mentioned before is why should ANY country have its chits from Saddam honored, when they took a risk giving money to a lunatic despot? In the real world, if you choose to be a loan shark, you'll not get the Attorney General to validate your losses, right? Iraq should start off with a clean slate. Fools who dealt with Saddam should take the loss for their own stupidity. Why is Bush bothering to negotiate with these clowns? Who is going to uphold the legitimacy of the debtor nations? Kofi Annan?? He's up to his ears in scandal himself, he won't take on the USA for fear of more info. tidbits about the oil for food embezzlement getting out to the MSM.

Posted by rex 2004-06-11 2:21:10 AM|| 2004-06-11 2:21:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 "Jacques Chirac said Iraq's potential oil wealth would make debt forgiveness hard to explain"

Bingo. We have a winner. "Why should we forgive a perfectly good debt? Iraq is good for it I tell ya!"

"Germany has agreed...on the condition that the U.S.-led coalition turn over control to an Iraqi interim government as scheduled on June 30"

Translation: "We can get far better deals (bribing the Iraqis) without the Yankees getting in the way."

Posted by Rafael 2004-06-11 2:25:37 AM|| 2004-06-11 2:25:37 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Why is Bush bothering to negotiate with these clowns? Who is going to uphold the legitimacy of the debtor nations?

That's what I was thinking. Another thing to consider: how about if Iraq just threatens to default on their debt. Then see the Euros squirm and quickly change tune. Given Iraq's oil reserves (potential wealth) the consequences of defaulting wouldn't be a problem, as opposed to other countries.

Posted by Rafael 2004-06-11 2:33:37 AM|| 2004-06-11 2:33:37 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Don't mess with the swiss!
i got money there.....

Posted by frenchfregoli 2004-06-11 3:32:32 AM|| 2004-06-11 3:32:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 And everyone knows...It's better to have the Swiss hide the 'dough', than shelter it in space, behind the Moon somewhere!!

Posted by smn 2004-06-11 3:47:07 AM|| 2004-06-11 3:47:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Iraq just threatens to default on their debt It would also dictators credit ratings to ratshit. "Sorry sir but your credit line has been withdrawn. Would you like to pay cash for that?"

Posted by Phil B 2004-06-11 3:58:55 AM|| 2004-06-11 3:58:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Bush goal is to make support of dictators a losing proposition. If he makes the cost of business with Saddam high enough, countries lke France and Germany may look at the potential losses of dealing with other dictator regimes (China?) in the future.

Posted by john 2004-06-11 7:32:22 AM|| 2004-06-11 7:32:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 We shouldnt encourage debt forgiveness. Saddam, although a dictator, was the legitimate ruler of Iraq. He is no longer, due to the US. I don't accept legality/illegality of war, because I dont accept extra-national court systems.

Now as the new leadership comes in, they must repudiate the debt (and risk loosing a trading partner) or talk someone into covering the debt/debt forgiveness.

IF that debt isnt paid, who will be Iraq's main trading partner? Could it be the US? Why yes, we are willing to buy your oil and supply nice things which will boost the US economy.

And that outcome sounds better than debt forgiveness to me :)

My hat is very black today how odd...

Posted by flash91 2004-06-11 11:15:28 AM|| 2004-06-11 11:15:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Awright! I agree with flash91 on every point. Iraq has what everyone needs and will need for decades to come. It IS debatable whether or not those who do business with a Dictator should expect any legal "protection" when the asshat is retired. They can tell anyone who does not forgive the debt to go piss up a rope. Someone will pay market price for their oil. Period. And the US could certainly kick off the festivities by signing a contract for whatever they have for export. I don't wear hats, but black would be fine by me, heh.

Posted by .com 2004-06-11 11:24:52 AM|| 2004-06-11 11:24:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 If he makes the cost of business with Saddam high enough, countries lke France and Germany may look at the potential losses of dealing with other dictator regimes (China?) in the future.

Precisely what Reagan did during the Cold War; he made the Soviets pay a price (in increasing military expenditures) they couldn't afford.

Au contraire, Chiraq, history does repeat itself.

Posted by Raj 2004-06-11 12:39:35 PM|| [http://angrycyclist.blogspot.com] 2004-06-11 12:39:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 rex> If Switzerland wants to play with the bad boys of the world, they should lose their seat in the UN [big loss, I know, don't laugh,Switzerland probably would see membership in the UN as valuable, argh]

LOL!! Do you know that Switzerland wasn't even a UN member until a couple years ago? It clearly saw UN as far less valuable than the US sees it.

Threaten it to take it back to 2002 when it didn't have UN membership? How will it *ever* manage.

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2004-06-11 4:41:55 PM|| 2004-06-11 4:41:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Thanks, aris, for a good history lesson! Funny, I assumed that the Swiss would not have missed a golden opportunity to wheel and deal with world leaders ie. be ready and waiting to open new bank accounts as one Third World thug is replaced by another despot/thief. But the Swiss are also frugal. I did further research and evidently previous referenda to join the UN were defeated because the Swiss thought membership would be a poor investment[no kidding] as well the Swiss worried about losing their neutrality and be forced to follow UN sanctions against dictators[clients] like Uncle Saddam.

So withdrawing UN membership would probably please the Swiss voters, since they narrowly approved joining the UN in 2002...what threat, what threat would strike fear in the hearts of the Swiss???...perhaps, threatening to move the UN headquarters from Manhattan to Geneva? Yes, that might tick the Swiss off, the prospect of having valuable real estate wasted on a meeting place for UN thugs, thieves, and dictators. LOL.

Posted by rex 2004-06-11 6:29:40 PM|| 2004-06-11 6:29:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 Well, I can see their point. We should forgive debts to many of the African countries...

...as soon as we invade, smash their governments, and put their dictators on trial.

Let's start with Zimbabwe.

Posted by jackal 2004-06-11 10:15:16 PM|| [http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html] 2004-06-11 10:15:16 PM|| Front Page Top

20:05 .com
20:02 Frank G
19:47 Fred Fighter
13:00 Anonymous6081
21:32 Peter D. Zimmerman
21:00 zosolover69
13:01 jules 187
08:14 Tony (UK)
04:32 Bulldog
02:56 Tibor
02:49 Atomic Conspiracy
01:43 Dar
01:31 Atomic Conspiracy
01:18 True German Ally
01:02 someone
00:42 .com
00:26 RWV
00:05 Phil B
00:04 Jen
00:03 john
23:32 Infidel Bob
23:10 Robert Crawford
23:09 Robert Crawford
23:06 Super Hose