Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/21/2004 View Thu 05/20/2004 View Wed 05/19/2004 View Tue 05/18/2004 View Mon 05/17/2004 View Sun 05/16/2004 View Sat 05/15/2004
1
2004-05-21 Home Front: Politix
Kerry considering end run round McCain-Finegold
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Laurence of the Rats 2004-05-21 4:07:25 PM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Link via Drudge.
Posted by Laurence of the Rats  2004-05-21 4:08:39 PM|| [http://punictreachery.typepad.com/]  2004-05-21 4:08:39 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 LOTR, I think it's worse than changing rules in the middle of the game. It's more like conveniently ignoring laws that don't benefit himself or his fellow DemocRATS. I don't think Kerry has the ability to to unilaterally delay accepting the nomination, maybe he does; shouldn't he have consulted the UN & France before doing this?

Remember the Lautenberg bait & switch? This is just more of the same sad legacy left by Clinton - win at all costs.
Posted by Raj  2004-05-21 4:20:48 PM|| [http://angrycyclist.blogspot.com]  2004-05-21 4:20:48 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 This is pretty crummy but perhaps it does point out a flaw in the law - that is that it favors the incumbent by giving him/her a longer time to use primary funds. Perhaps a hard date cutoff? This sort of thing cuts both ways.

Still, as long as it's the law, if you're going to be the chief executive of the law, you might demonstrate an intent to, you know, carry it out by actually acknowledging its existence. Like TR and the Sunday alcohol ban in NY.
Posted by Sawt al-Shebaab 2004-05-21 5:27:00 PM||   2004-05-21 5:27:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Haven't checked, but I'll bet that McCain-Feingold CFR was actually one of the things Sen. Ketchup voted for...
No matter, because the rest of his fellow Dimocrats couldn't wait to pass it.
Now that they have to obey it, they have other plans.
Typical.
Posted by Jen  2004-05-21 5:29:51 PM|| [http://www.greatestjeneration.com]  2004-05-21 5:29:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 They don't have to follow McCain-Feingold. They are special. Its the ADA. When you are idea challenged the ADA trumps McC-F. Its a handicap thing.
Posted by BigEd 2004-05-21 5:35:56 PM||   2004-05-21 5:35:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 the earlier date for the dem convention, ergo the cutoff in use of private funds is Terry McAuliffe's Big Mistake© Nobody said the incumbent has the later date, but lil Terry decided to do his early....how was he to know the Olympics, scheduled every friggin' 4 yrs would occur again this year? How was he to know that his best pal Bill Clinton would release his memoir, sucking all the media oxygen from the room? It ain't his fault!
Posted by Frank G  2004-05-21 6:41:05 PM||   2004-05-21 6:41:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Lemee See :
Democrat Convention - July 26-July 29
Olympics - Aug 13-Aug 29
Republican Convention - Aug 30-Sep 2
Labor Day Sep 6

OK: Kerry doesn't accept nomination July 29th
Then when does he do it. No speech. No Acceptance. or Speech commenting on the heatwave in his city (Boston)

He is so stupid that if he tries to pull it off he may be able to get the FEC to let him slide.
A anti-Kerry decision will claim that Bush is {BAAAW} unfair. But people will look at the legal pretzelization and say, "Reminds me of Clinton."

If he tries that, he will be ridiculed.

However if he does accept the nomination after Aug 13th?

Person 1 : "Kerry accepted the Democrat's nomination!"
Person 2 : "Yeah? Who cares. We just got a gold medal in women's wrestling."
Posted by BigEd 2004-05-21 7:06:21 PM||   2004-05-21 7:06:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Personally, I think the riots and violence in Boston's and NY's streets will overwhelm the convention coverage....especially the NYTCBSNBCPBSABC coverage of the Republican convention...call me a cynic, but the opportunity to vent hate and stupidity by clueless trustfundbabies will be too hard to pass up. Think 20,000 Al Frankens and Janeane Garofalos.... oh, and giant paper-mache puppets: Bushitler, etc ...gotta have those
Posted by Frank G  2004-05-21 7:13:10 PM||   2004-05-21 7:13:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Fred Barnes on the Hewitt show just had an interesting thought. If the public funds the nominating convention at $14,000,000 each, and Kerry doesn't accept immediately, the DNC may be liable for the $14M.
Posted by BigEd 2004-05-21 7:17:27 PM||   2004-05-21 7:17:27 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 I don't understand the process here ( or much else about American politics) Surely the party nominates the candidate. If you doesnt say then and there "I accept" is he nominated or not? And how to word the "I accept in 6 weeks but not right now" speech? I cant wait for that one. It will be the anti-climax of all time. How will he even be able to call himself the candidate, if he hasn't accepted the nomination? How dumb are these people, anyway?
Posted by Grunter 2004-05-21 7:17:28 PM||   2004-05-21 7:17:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Grunter - You don't understand the state of the Democrat Party since "Bubba" Clinton came on the scene. This kind of idea is NORMAL for them.
Posted by BigEd 2004-05-21 7:22:24 PM||   2004-05-21 7:22:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 How dumb are these people, anyway?

They voted for Algore.

They think Algore won in 2000.

They think Kerry's war record is an asset.

They attribute made-up statements to people and attack the people based on those fictions.

They call opinions they disagree with "evil".

That's how stupid they are.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-05-21 8:10:20 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2004-05-21 8:10:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 I really hope he does this!

Can you imagine the Republican ads informing the swing voters of Kerry's tactics and motivations?
Posted by spiffo 2004-05-21 8:42:13 PM||   2004-05-21 8:42:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 "I didn't accept it before I accepted it"

John Kerry - Nov 2004, presidential concession speech

Posted by spiffo 2004-05-21 8:44:32 PM||   2004-05-21 8:44:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 So he could actually wait until November before he accepted to nomination? Maybe he could just put his name on the ballot a a proposed candidate and continue to raise money even after the election.
Posted by john  2004-05-21 10:46:32 PM||   2004-05-21 10:46:32 PM|| Front Page Top

15:21 Anonymous5082
18:49 NCO
00:55 Jen
23:51 Tex
13:12 Anonymous4985
20:16 Curious
19:04 muck4doo
18:59 .com
18:53 muck4doo
18:37 Big Mama
18:30 Romana
17:23 yorgos
17:19 Aris Katsaris
17:15 yorgos
17:03 Raj
16:54 yorgos
10:28 Shipman
10:20 yorgos
09:17 Mike Sylwester
08:40 longtime lurker
08:38 Mike Sylwester
08:37 longtime lurker
08:34 longtime lurker
06:14 Shipman









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com