Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 05/09/2004 View Sat 05/08/2004 View Fri 05/07/2004 View Thu 05/06/2004 View Wed 05/05/2004 View Tue 05/04/2004 View Mon 05/03/2004
1
2004-05-09 Home Front: WoT
Seattle-area Iraqis "divided" over photos -- some say Sunni prisoners deserved mistreatment
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mike 2004-05-09 7:23:11 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Hello? Is anyone in there?

Those photos are faked. The have been Photoshopped or run through the GIMP.

These photoes appear to be part of a propoganda campaign against our troops.

Do not buy into this bullsh*t, please.
Posted by badanov  2004-05-09 8:08:30 AM|| [http://www.rkka.org]  2004-05-09 8:08:30 AM|| Front Page Top

#2  When the people in the photos (the Americans) say they are real I tend to believe them. I have seen nothing to convince me they are faked, especially when Mr. Rumsfeld in his testimony on Friday said he was told back in January there were photographs. There seem to be hundreds if not thousands of photographs as well as videos. The pictures of British and American troops sexually abusing Iraqi women have been proved to be fakes.
Posted by Deacon Blues 2004-05-09 8:43:04 AM||   2004-05-09 8:43:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 A distinction needs to be made. And as it is, it is not being made. The pr0n photos are released to be as real as the others we know to be real.

We know now some photos are faked but we do not know which ondes.

My whole argument is that there is a good probability that some of the photoes Rumsfeld is talking about are fake or at least have been planted. I don't want the Pentagon staff traipsing down a road to please American leftists if even one photo is faked or planted.

And the photoes that are available that are real, the other 99.999 percent of soldiers who did not commit these crimes deserve to know who took the photos and why, why the deeds were done, who told them to do the deeds and why, and who knew about the deeds and the photos, and who did and did not inform command of these things.

And you gotta admit in the passed week no one the press has been prudent about any photos, or any element in this story. They have taken the photos, published them without getting any infromation answering the above, I think, rather critically important questions, before they were published.

I think in the end this will not be the American media's finest hour, especiually if we find one photo with so much as a single pixel changed.

In fact, I think they need to be hauled before the bar to explain their participation in the disemination of enemy war propoganda.
Posted by badanov  2004-05-09 8:58:54 AM|| [http://www.rkka.org]  2004-05-09 8:58:54 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 

I think in the end this will not be the American media's finest hour, especiually if we find one photo with so much as a single pixel changed.


In my 30+ years, the American press has yet to have a good hour, let alone a fine one.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-05-09 11:51:29 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2004-05-09 11:51:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 You just mean RC. I think the press did a
bang-up job on Princess Di's funeral.
Posted by Shipman 2004-05-09 1:14:23 PM||   2004-05-09 1:14:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 The photos on Jihad Unspun that depicted a rape by soldiers were right off of a porn site, the rest are likely real.

Posted by RussSchultz 2004-05-09 1:37:45 PM||   2004-05-09 1:37:45 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Well said Badanov. Their really has been no attempt, as far as I can tell, regarding the whowhatwhenwherewhy thing on the photos. Not that any of that shit happened. If the photos were to be used in the winning of the war or to be used in the loseing of the war.

A coordinated attack on Rumsfield, even before he testified, even a call for him to step down by my local paper, a Mcclatchy rag, along with calls from outraged dem-enemy congressmems and then a well planned demo at that hearing against Rums, not against the war or it's all about oil. Nope, Rumsfield.

I'm not trying to be a conspiracy guy. Just have questions and I'm easily lead.
Posted by Lucky 2004-05-09 1:56:58 PM||   2004-05-09 1:56:58 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Oh, and Shipman is right. Those photos of the flowers all piled up....Sorry I still get a tear.
Posted by Lucky 2004-05-09 1:59:30 PM||   2004-05-09 1:59:30 PM|| Front Page Top

22:01 Man Bites Dog
12:16 redsnapper
17:19 Man Bites Dog TROLL
17:19 Man Bites Dog TROLL
15:55 Man Bites Dog TROLL
15:55 Man Bites Dog TROLL
12:49 Man Bites Dog TROLL
12:49 Man Bites Dog TROLL
12:42 Man Bites Dog TROLL
12:42 Man Bites Dog TROLL
10:36 Man Bites Dog TROLL
10:36 Man Bites Dog TROLL
15:48 Man Bites Dog TROLL
10:41 Man Bites Dog TROLL
04:18 Man Bites Dog TROLL
22:15 Man Bites Dog TROLL
17:11 Anonymous4849
07:48 Bulldog
07:30 Howard UK
07:19 Bulldog
06:47 Howard UK
05:07 Bulldog
01:26 SON OF TOLUI
00:52 mojo









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com