Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 04/24/2004 View Fri 04/23/2004 View Thu 04/22/2004 View Wed 04/21/2004 View Tue 04/20/2004 View Mon 04/19/2004 View Sun 04/18/2004
1
2004-04-24 Home Front: WoT
Rummy on the Draft
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Super Hose 2004-04-24 3:34:49 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 im hear they only going to draft needie homeless democrats sounds just like a repuglicans
Posted by HalfEmpty 2004-04-24 10:07:28 AM||   2004-04-24 10:07:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Well, one thing occurs to me... the same person doing the same job, once he takes off his military uniform and puts on a civilian one, is a) no longer under militiary discipline, and b) may be liable, as many of the current civilians are, to have to go to work without any means of self-defense. (Most civilian contractors in Iraq can't carry weapons of their own). OTOH, I think the whole "we need a draft" situation is bogus: you can read my thoughts here.
Posted by Phil Fraering 2004-04-24 11:13:16 AM|| [http://newsfromthefridge.typepad.com]  2004-04-24 11:13:16 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 the draft idea belongs to longtime Dem idiot, Charlie Rangel, and is strictly a vehicle to damage, not help, our ability to project military power
Posted by Frank G  2004-04-24 11:29:15 AM||   2004-04-24 11:29:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 The DRAFT is a phony issue. Implementation of the draft will not add one single soldier to the force. The size of our military is authorized by Congress. IF we need more troops, all Congress has to do is authorize and fund more troops. There are more than enough qualified volunteers to fill any force structure that Congress might authorize short of a WWII size mobilization.

This talk about the draft is self-indulgence by aging baby boomers trying to recall the battles of their youth. They were young morons then and they're old morons now.
Posted by RWV 2004-04-24 11:34:21 AM||   2004-04-24 11:34:21 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 "This talk about the draft is self-indulgence by aging baby boomers trying to recall the battles of their youth."

Indeed. When you look back at force levels since the draft ended in 1972, it's clear that the size of the U.S. Army could easily be doubled without any draft: from 1973 until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the number of Army active duty personnel was constant at just under 800,000.

"They were young morons then and they're old morons now."

Yeah. And in the process of moving from young moronhood to old moronhood, they fathered a whole new generation of morons, who now populate Indymedia and DU.

Sterilize 'em all.
Posted by Dave D.  2004-04-24 12:53:15 PM||   2004-04-24 12:53:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 
They were young morons then and they're old morons now
That sums it up perfectly, RWV.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut  2004-04-24 6:38:36 PM||   2004-04-24 6:38:36 PM|| Front Page Top

17:19 Sharon in NYC
22:09 Infidel Bob
02:29 Super Hose
02:23 Super Hose
02:16 Super Hose
02:02 Super Hose
01:26 Anonymous4052
01:11 Barbara Skolaut
00:52 Long Hair Republican
00:13 tu3031
23:52 tu3031
23:49 Old Patriot
23:49 tu3031
23:47 Mike Kozlowski
23:33 The Doctor
23:30 The Doctor
23:28 tu3031
23:20 PBMcL
23:16 Antiwar TROLL
23:09 Ptah
23:06 Frank G
23:05 Frank G
23:03 Robert Crawford
22:59 GK









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com