Article

2004-03-04 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve 2004-03-04 11:27:25 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 This ties in with Tipper's post the other day about a truce in the war on drugs to help us with the war on terror. Any excessive tax on a high demand item leads to black marketing. The high producer surpluses from black marketing will be used for criminal or terrorist activities. I know that there is a lot of opposition to legalizing "hard" drugs, but can't we at least stop the stupidity with regard to punitive tobacco taxes?

Posted by 11A5S 2004-3-4 11:40:17 AM|| 2004-3-4 11:40:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 but can't we at least stop the stupidity with regard to punitive tobacco taxes?

What, and give up all that money? It's easier for a crack head to give up his dope than for a politician to give up tax money. That's why even if they legalize drugs, you'll still have drug smugglers. All the proposals for legalizing drugs call for taxing them to provide for drug treatment and anti-drug education. Just like the tobacco settlement was and like the proposed "fat tax" on fast food to fight obesity. It's all about the money. That's why there are still moonshiners, people don't want to pay the alcohol tax.

Oh, and if you think any drug company is going to want to jump into the market to sell legalized drugs, just think about all the lawsuits they'd face for selling a real addictive drug. Look what's happening to tobacco companies. Would you want that kind of headache?

Posted by Steve 2004-3-4 12:23:18 PM|| 2004-3-4 12:23:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 I guess Lackawanna means fine tobaccos

Posted by Jennie Taliaferro 2004-3-4 1:12:38 PM|| [http://www.greatestjeneration.com] 2004-3-4 1:12:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 You're right, Steve, but dammit, it's still stupid policy that's hurting us all around.

Posted by 11A5S 2004-3-4 3:11:20 PM|| 2004-3-4 3:11:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 it's still stupid policy that's hurting us all around.
If we did away with all the "stupid policy that's hurting us", we would need to fire half the federal government - they wouldn't have anything to do. It's a nice thougth, but remember the truism: "There's nothing more permanent than a 'temporary' government agency". Add to that Jefferson's comment that government, by human nature, was a beast whose only goal was to grow, and you know how difficult it is to "control" government growth. That's what revolutions are for - to reduce the size of bloated government. It's the only known, effective process.

Posted by Old Patriot 2004-3-4 3:46:12 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2004-3-4 3:46:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 OP, I've often thought the same thing. Another example: I've been told that due to improvements in building construction and household appliance design, we need significantly fewer fire fighters than we did 50 years ago. (Note to fire fighters and relatives thereof: you're great people and I appreciate what you do. Please don't take this personally.) But if you were to publish that in Newsweek for example, you'd be pilloried. It's not open for discussion. You're right. It will take a revolutionary event on the order of the Civil War or the Great Depression before we can start even talking about these things.

Posted by 11A5S 2004-3-4 4:44:51 PM|| 2004-3-4 4:44:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Reform is needed across the board - including tort law which makes Steve's observation true.

It looks like we are due for a rethink across that board. What works and what doesn't in our little experiment. Everything should be in, nothing left out. I agree with 11A5S and OP wholeheartedly - I figure that if we ever actually do this, there will be another Civil War. Sometimes we need to clean house - and I think it has come in some quarters - and is not far off in others. The Internet can make this possible for individuals to participate (not just the elected reps who sometimes "forget" from whom their power is derived) - where it hasn't been prior. Interesting times are afoot and even more are approaching - at an ever-increasing pace.

Posted by .com 2004-3-4 8:21:11 PM|| 2004-3-4 8:21:11 PM|| Front Page Top

08:58 sakattack
09:26 Dar
06:55 Shipman
03:49 Jennie Taliaferro
02:39 B
02:18 Beau
02:12 Anonymous
00:35 ed
00:33 Anonymous
00:21 CobraCommander
00:11 djohn66
00:07 NotMike Moore
00:04 NotMike Moore
23:58 NotMike Moore
23:53 NotMike Moore
23:50 Robert Crawford
23:47 NotMike Moore
23:43 ed
23:39 Alaska Paul
23:36 Alaska Paul
23:34 NotMike Moore
23:33 Tibor
23:33 Danny
23:27 Tibor