Article

2004-01-25 Home Front

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Super Hose 2004-01-25 2:32:55 PM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 ...What I love the most about idiot reports like this is that they never give you the true story, and the writers frequently lie awake nights hoping you aren't smart enough to check up on things.
First off, let's look at what Dr. Christie does, from http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2001/b07232001_bt331-01.html

Thomas P. Christie was sworn in July 17 as the director of Operational Test and Evaluation. In this capacity, he serves as the principal staff assistant and primary advisor to the Secretary of Defense on testing of DoD weapon systems. He will prescribe policies and procedures for the conduct of operational test and evaluation, live-fire test and evaluation, the composition and operations of the major range and test facility base, and the configuration of the test and evaluation infrastructure within the Defense Department. As he performs these duties, Christie will issue guidance to and consult with Pentagon leadership.

He isn't the chief weapons tester. His job is to make sure that when we test things, we don't hurt ourselves or others. His job is also to lay down the parameters under which such tests will be judged.

They say that a continuing series of tests and upgrades will improve the capability of the system, which is now being erected at Ft. Greely, Alaska, and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

The system - as it stands now - is the result of more than forty years of continuous research into anti-missile systems. We have continually refined and improved the technology. Yes, we've had tests where the missile didn't hit the incoming. No one ever seems to consider the possibility that the function of the test might not BE to hit the missile.

He also said additional tests of the Cobra Dane radar that would be critical to the system were "currently not planned."

Cobra Dane went operational in 1977, and its primary function since has been to track - surprise - ICBM and SLBM launches. I think we can safely assume it will work. Now, is he referring to an interface problem, a hardware problem, a software problem, or is he simply saying that they haven't done as many integrated tests with Cobra Dane as they'd like? We don't know, and this article would happily have you believe it means the worst.

John Isaacs, president of Council for a Livable World, an arms-control group in Washington, who?s negative oppinion was easier to obtain than one from a real scientist said the report is "essentially confirmation that the deployment is essentially a sham, and that there?s no evidence it will work. He called it a political deployment."

We have a winnah...I'm not even going to hazard a guess at Mr. Isaacs' politics nor those of his organization. I believe they are obvious. It also doesn't say much for Mr Isaacs' analytical powers - the report most certainly does NOT confirm anything other than the fact that it is a new, state of the art weapons system with some bugs.

I notice that apparently neither Mr Issacs nor this article's author has a very good memory. Anybody remember the wind up to Desert Storm? The disastrous, 'won't work' weapons we deployed to the Gulf, like the Apache, the M1, the M2 the Patriot, and the ALCM/SLCM? I am convinced to this day that the stories about how bad these weapons were were at the very least tolerated by the leadership in order to mislead the bad guys.

One last thing - there will be some truly spectacular fireworks when we try to install the system at Vandy. Look for the nutcases to pull out all the stops on that one.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2004-1-25 3:32:07 PM|| 2004-1-25 3:32:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 with a second component in California,
?
Whoa... I thought the system was a a single beta brand launch system based in Alaska. Another Cobra Dane radar?

Posted by Shipman 2004-1-25 3:33:22 PM|| 2004-1-25 3:33:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Ship-
Honestly not sure. I THINK that Cobra Dane will handle tracking for the CA site as well. That makes a fair amount of sense to me, insofar as it doesn't require building of new radars, clearing large areas of land, and charges of irradiating baby ducks.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2004-1-25 3:49:30 PM|| 2004-1-25 3:49:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 So DoD is trying to kill all the baby ducks? Fox news isn't reporting that yet, I'll check ABC.

Posted by Lucky 2004-1-25 5:14:28 PM|| 2004-1-25 5:14:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 another reason the security has been stepped up at Vandenberg. Recall that the head of security told the last batch of goofballs threatening to get on the base to do mischief that deadly force was authorized

Posted by Frank G 2004-1-25 5:39:26 PM|| 2004-1-25 5:39:26 PM|| Front Page Top

23:54 Footstone
10:55 liberalhawk
07:53 Ptah
04:12 Aris Katsaris
01:06 SON OF TOLUI
00:52 Lucky
00:46 Lucky
00:41 SON OF TOLUI
00:39 Lucky
00:32 Lucky
00:24 RMcLeod
23:54 Anonymous2U
23:12 Anonymous2U
22:54 Anonymous2U
22:30 Mike Sylwester
22:27 Ptah
21:20 .com
21:20 DANEgerus
21:16 .com
21:13 Super Hose
21:02 Super Hose
20:58 .com
20:57 Super Hose
20:56 mhw