Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 01/25/2004 View Sat 01/24/2004 View Fri 01/23/2004 View Thu 01/22/2004 View Wed 01/21/2004 View Tue 01/20/2004 View Mon 01/19/2004
1
2004-01-25 Iraq
The GC’s view of women in Iraq
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Gasse Katze 2004-01-25 12:49:34 AM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Whilst I have been arguing against early direct elections. IMO the big argument in favor of early direct elections is that it may forestall disenfranchizing and limiting the rights of women.
Posted by phil_b 2004-1-25 5:46:41 AM||   2004-1-25 5:46:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Only if they can make sure women can vote, and can vote securely and privately, phil. Otherwise they'll either get ordered to stay home or ordered to vote a particular way.
Posted by Kathy K  2004-1-25 5:54:41 AM|| [site-essential.com/]  2004-1-25 5:54:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Which brings me back to creating a constitution first. Write into the constitution that men and women are politically and legally equal (the same). Make changes to the constitution dependant on a popular vote say 2/3rds majority and it pretty much guarantees that it can't be changed seeing as women can vote on it.

Kathy I'm assuming a secure secret ballot here.
Posted by phil_b 2004-1-25 6:22:46 AM||   2004-1-25 6:22:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 phil thats part of the problem. One of the reasons the CPA has been pushing for caucuses is because they CAN'T seem to secure a secret ballot system. Personally I think we need to come down on them hard if necessary MAKE the constitution for them like we did Japan.
Posted by Val 2004-1-25 6:58:10 AM||   2004-1-25 6:58:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 I believe acceding to sharia is part of the back door deals being made with the likes of Sistani in trade for the cave dwellers’ giving the (temporary) appearance of accepting the GC, and delaying the calls for jihad. But it’s a deal with the devil, as we have seen every time totalitarian scumbags are appeased.

I still maintain that progress in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the hell holes around the Middle East, will be measured by how woman are treated in the law, and in the courts.
Posted by Hyper 2004-1-25 8:54:38 AM||   2004-1-25 8:54:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 What the hell is Bush doing about this? Nothing! I don't understand this at all, he should be right on top of this.
Posted by Charles  2004-1-25 9:36:50 AM||   2004-1-25 9:36:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Curiously, I believe he may have enlisted the support of the Soddies. See Prince Saud's comments, above.
Posted by Fred  2004-1-25 10:45:43 AM||   2004-1-25 10:45:43 AM|| Front Page Top

23:54 Footstone
10:55 liberalhawk
07:53 Ptah
04:12 Aris Katsaris
01:06 SON OF TOLUI
00:52 Lucky
00:46 Lucky
00:41 SON OF TOLUI
00:39 Lucky
00:32 Lucky
00:24 RMcLeod
23:54 Anonymous2U
23:12 Anonymous2U
22:54 Anonymous2U
22:30 Mike Sylwester
22:27 Ptah
21:20 .com
21:20 DANEgerus
21:16 .com
21:13 Super Hose
21:02 Super Hose
20:58 .com
20:57 Super Hose
20:56 mhw









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com