Article

2004-01-12 Home Front

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2004-01-12 11:46:16 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

then moved to deport detainees who had no demonstrated link to terrorism but who had violated civil immigration laws, lawyers for the Center for National Security Studies wildly claimed told the court.

Are we only supposed to deport terrorists? Sounds to me like the government acted in accordance with US law.

Posted by Scott 2004-1-12 12:19:28 PM|| [http://tacoflavoredkisses.com/tfkblog/] 2004-1-12 12:19:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 What's the difference between "civil immigration laws" and "criminal immigration laws"? Is there one? If so, why?

Posted by Robert Crawford 2004-1-12 12:35:10 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2004-1-12 12:35:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 If they want names, ok:

Mohammed, Mahmoud, Ahmed, Abu, Abdul, Ali... that should already cover 50%

One out of two ain't bad, right? Add a "bin" and you get 75%

Posted by True German Ally 2004-1-12 2:13:33 PM|| 2004-1-12 2:13:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 "The high courtâs decision not to review the case represents a victory for the Bush administration." No it's a victory for AMERICA and those trying to protect it!

Posted by Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) 2004-1-12 7:10:44 PM|| 2004-1-12 7:10:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Sandy must've called in sick today. It is the cold and flu season.

Posted by tu3031 2004-1-12 9:25:37 PM|| 2004-1-12 9:25:37 PM|| Front Page Top

18:19 dp tick
01:42 Tony (UK)
01:07 Tony (UK)
00:47 Tony (UK)
00:23 Lucky
00:02 Tony (UK)
00:02 Lucky
00:01 CrazyFool
23:48 Desert Blondie
23:41 B
23:37 Lucky
23:36 B
23:31 Bomb-a-rama
23:28 Desert Blondie
23:24 B
23:23 Wasserman
23:16 Lucky
23:09 Lucky
22:56 Desert Blondie
22:54 tu3031
22:45 tu3031
22:40 tu3031
22:34 Desert Blondie
22:31 Desert Blondie