Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 12/21/2003 View Sat 12/20/2003 View Fri 12/19/2003 View Thu 12/18/2003 View Wed 12/17/2003 View Tue 12/16/2003 View Mon 12/15/2003
1
2003-12-21 Africa: North
Real reason for Gaddafi’s WMD surrender
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2003-12-21 1:07:54 AM|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Apparently NK and Iran while providing assistance to Libya, were also using Libya to produce parts for their own WMD programs, something Mo's capitulation will both hurt and expose. What was that about an "Axis" that was so wrong, you (Dem/Lefty/French/UN) assholes?
Posted by Frank G  2003-12-21 7:35:42 AM||   2003-12-21 7:35:42 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 So can we refer to the troops involved as the PSI Corps?
Posted by Robert Crawford  2003-12-21 9:12:55 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2003-12-21 9:12:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 RC!! A fellow traveler!

A B5 quote that Bush probably liked (based on events):
"Only one human captain has ever survived battle with the Minbari fleet. He is behind me. You are in front of me. If you value your lives, be somewhere else."
Posted by snellenr  2003-12-21 10:24:48 AM||   2003-12-21 10:24:48 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 The ships that are seized represent a large capital loss for the smugglers. I imagine that the infrastructure to transport, load and unload the contraband is now threatened.
Posted by Super Hose  2003-12-21 11:21:11 AM||   2003-12-21 11:21:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 SH -- look for an up-tick in piracy.

snellenr -- I almost hope the US and Britain DO form a permanent body for PSI, just so we can use the name.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2003-12-21 11:23:58 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2003-12-21 11:23:58 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 So. G'Daffy. Lockerby responsibility? WMD dismantling? WTF?

In the face of tyrant-hating skepticism, can one hope that, regardless of G’Daffy’s private thoughts and wishes, he has decided the best way to stay alive, clean-shaven, and fully loused avoid Saddamification retain power, is to start playing nice, like real humans do?

How can one doubt that the Taliban ass-kicking, isolating Arafat, and Saddam-bagging has everything to do with G’Daffy being, well, un-G’Daffy-like over the last couple of years? He knows how easily he could be flicked off the "throne"…

A boy can dream, can't he? Assuming M-Gad still retains visions of grandeur, he could put his efforts into pulling Africa out of its latrine-ditch existence, and leave a legacy of Afro-Arab leadership. Who’s holding their breath for this? No one. I’m just sayin’, the Bush doctrine could finally refocus the grandiose visions of piss ant tyrant wannabes away from ruling the world, and toward making the world a better place to live in for the people in the neighborhood. That would be a historic geopolitical shift. And who better than Africans to bring Africa out of the darkness? Like I said, a boy can dream…
Posted by Hyper 2003-12-21 1:31:03 PM||   2003-12-21 1:31:03 PM|| Front Page Top

23:41 Fred
23:11 Dan (not Darling)
23:04 True German Ally
23:01 Steve White
22:59 Zhang Fei
22:44 TS
22:44 Glenn (not Reynolds)
22:35 Alaska Paul
22:33 PBMcL
22:33 TS
22:30 Raj
22:22 4thInfVet
22:19 TS
22:12 Robert Crawford
21:58 rkb
21:47 4thInfVet
21:40 Zhang Fei
21:40 mhw
21:31 Glenn (not Reynolds)
21:20 Glenn (not Reynolds)
21:05 Glenn (not Reynolds)
20:50 Glenn (not Reynolds)
20:48 CrazyFool
20:43 Scooter McGruder









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com