Article

2003-10-30 Iraq

"The real threat to Iraqis is coming now from Western defeatists"

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Mike 2003-10-30 8:38:54 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Sorry but I believe Bush will withdraw within 6 months, even with a UN resolution international backup is close to zero. Bush hopes to get a trophy (Saddam) so he can declare his mission finished without losing to much face, leaving Iraq a la Afghanistan, semi civil war.

Posted by Murat 2003-10-30 10:00:54 AM|| 2003-10-30 10:00:54 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 last i heard we were still in afganistan.

Posted by liberalhawk 2003-10-30 10:06:35 AM|| 2003-10-30 10:06:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Guess we'll just have to see where we are in 6 months then Murat. I think we'll still be there. At least I've been told to be ready to pull my rotation there in late '04 or in '05. LH is correct we are still in Afghanistan. We are still in Kosovo as well. I think the only way we get pulled quicker then '05 is if a Democrat wins the WH.

Posted by Jarhead 2003-10-30 10:12:09 AM|| 2003-10-30 10:12:09 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Murat:

Explain again why leaving Saddam in power would have been a good thing for Iraq--or Turkey, for that matter.

Posted by Mike 2003-10-30 10:12:17 AM|| 2003-10-30 10:12:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Murat, If we CAN leave in six months, then we will have had a big win. We learned a lesson in Vietnam about doing something half-assed. Bush will not leave the country until it can be on it's own. We can and should start redeploying troops that are covering Bosnia. They should be standing on their own by now and if they screw up I think the EU should step in. This will reduce the Ops-tempo for our troops and greatly increase morale. Yes Jarhead you will garrison Iraq for at least the next year (or maybe two). The more schools, hospitals, and mosques that the terrorists bomb decreases their support. Also the border force is coming together and this will reduce the number of islamo-idiots that can cross into Iraq.

Posted by Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) 2003-10-30 10:44:43 AM|| 2003-10-30 10:44:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Explain again why leaving Saddam in power would have been a good thing for Iraq--or Turkey, for that matter.

Saddam is born on 28 April 1937 (he is almost 67), this grandpa is almost senile and cannot form any big threat to the world, waiting a couple of years and he would have gone naturally.

1 It would have spared lives of thousands in Iraq if war did not happen
2 Iraq is now facing anarchy, which would probably not happened.
3 Both of his sons donât have the capacity to follow on their father.

But a natural death of Saddam would have deprived the US of a just cause (fighting a dictator with alleged WMD weapons) to occupy its oil recourses.

Posted by Murat 2003-10-30 10:50:36 AM|| 2003-10-30 10:50:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Heck, we're still in Korea and Germany and we successfully implemented a containment strategy against the Soviet Union that took 40+ years. We were in Vietnam for nearly ten years.

Jarhead: Have you seen the new book The March Up about the First Marine Division in Iraq? Looked good to me, but what do you think?

Posted by Matt 2003-10-30 10:51:19 AM|| 2003-10-30 10:51:19 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 If the US had no intentions on OIL than someboddy should explain why halliburton and other US oil companies are tremendously profiting from the situation now.

I see none of you can, heck denying the undeniable is a hard task isn't it.

Posted by Murat 2003-10-30 11:05:39 AM|| 2003-10-30 11:05:39 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Murat:

If Saddam had died a natural death, Uday or Qsay--either one of whom made their old man look like a piker when it came to torture and repression--would have taken power. There were no practical alternatives, and neither boy was the sort to go gently into exile and take up art collecting.

If Saddam & Sons had stayed in power:

--thousands of Iraqis would have continued to be killed and maimed every month by the Baathist regime. (You like to talk about war casualties a lot, but for some reason you never mention the "normal wastage" of civillian lives during the "peaceful" reign of Saddam & Sons. Why is that?)

--Saddam would still be subsidizing Palestinian suicide bombers at $25K per detonation, and enriching himself (and TotalFinaElf) through the UN Oil-For-Gold-Plated-Bathrooms program.

--The marshes would still be deserts, and the Marsh Arabs a lost people.

This is all good, right? You're in favor of it, right?

(And, personally, if Haliburton rebuilds Iraq's infrastructure and gets the oil fields working again, it's only fair they be compensated for their efforts. It's better than paying TotalFinaElf to prop up the dictatorship, isn't it?)

Posted by Mike 2003-10-30 11:31:13 AM|| 2003-10-30 11:31:13 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Re: halliburton profiting on Oil contracts. Im sure Bechtel is profiting on road contracts. Does that mean we went in to build roads?

Posted by liberalhawk 2003-10-30 11:53:59 AM|| 2003-10-30 11:53:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Murat. After we're done sucking every drop of THE OIL out of Iraq, I say we head up to Turkey and grab every brick of THE HASH you're smoking up there. Can't see the lefties protesting against, "No War for Hashish!"

Posted by tu3031 2003-10-30 12:13:33 PM|| 2003-10-30 12:13:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Murat, if your country is poor because the oil fields were set afire and booby-trapped, and allowed to rot, does it matter how much profit the company makes that gets them functioning again?

Murat, pease provide a link or two to how much Haliburton is profiting. That's screamed about a lot but so far I haven't seen any evidence that they have even got the oil flowing properly yet, which means Haliburton is probably taking a substantial loss at this point.

Murat, you need to think things through a bit before you post. Post some links, prove your point, instead of spewing old discredited anti-American talking points. In the entire time you've posted here I don't think you've ever convinced a single person you were right about anything. You've got to work a bit harder than that.

Posted by Yank 2003-10-30 12:26:01 PM|| 2003-10-30 12:26:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Murat misses the point. If he wants a piece of the Halliburton action, he should just by the stock. Of course it dropped yesterday.

Posted by Anonymous-not above 2003-10-30 12:31:07 PM|| 2003-10-30 12:31:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 Murat- Just who the hell should get the re-building contracts? Who put lives and treasure on the line?

Just how many people did Saddam kill each month? Why don't you give us credit for stopping that perpetual slaughter?

Just how do you know that Uday or Qusay would not have continued the SLAUGHTER of thousands of their countrymen each month?

Posted by Craig 2003-10-30 12:39:41 PM|| 2003-10-30 12:39:41 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 Sorry but I believe Bush will withdraw within 6 months,..

Not going to happen. Bush knows what the consequences would be of just packing up and leaving, and WE know what the consequences would be. Any effort to just cut and run is not going to go unchallenged.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2003-10-30 1:13:42 PM|| 2003-10-30 1:13:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 Murat is, like soooo wrong about Halliburton.

Maybe next time, troll boy...

Posted by Raj 2003-10-30 1:25:33 PM|| [http://angrycyclist.blogspot.com] 2003-10-30 1:25:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#17 Any effort to just cut and run is not going to go unchallenged.
Which is one big reason the Democrats are going to be handed their heads in the election next fall. They are opposed to doing ANYTHING in the Middle East but hand-wringing. The American people have seen through their rhetoric, and find their position appalling. The constant broadcast of hate, most aimed at George Bush, reminds most Americans too much of Al Qaida and the radical islamofascists.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-10-30 3:36:13 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2003-10-30 3:36:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#18 I sure as hell saw more irrational hatred broadcast against Bill Clinton than I've seen against GWB! And much better funded--like Mellon~~head~~ Scaife, Rupert Murdoch, et.al.

Posted by Not Mike Moore 2003-10-30 5:02:47 PM|| 2003-10-30 5:02:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#19 even with a UN resolution international backup is close to zero

Mur RAT - do they teach math in turkey? or did you choose to play hookey that day....

there are over 10,000 troops other than American as part of the coalition (not including the brits)

thats just a bit more than close to zero.

and you should expect to see an american footprint for years to come - we are already spending hundreds of millions on signals intel to keep tabs on the surrounding countries.

your just peeved that the turks come out of all this looking very weak - got the kurds standing behind uncle sam thunbing their noses at you.

if this was about oil then we would of left hussien in power as our puppet. yes american compainies are getting handsome profits - not in selling iraqi oil but in repairing infrastructure. and if it is american tax payer money then those monies go to american companies.

american, british, french, russian, chinese and even turkish oil companies have done business in the are for decades. just because an american company, paid for by the us treasury, has the lion share of contracts means nothing.

your an idiot - try and look at what is really going on. we are going to change this region one way another, and not for goddam oil!

Posted by Dan 2003-10-30 6:41:40 PM|| 2003-10-30 6:41:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#20 Both of his sons donât have the capacity to follow on their father

You got that right Bosporus.

Posted by Shipman 2003-10-30 9:16:14 PM|| 2003-10-30 9:16:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#21 Matt, I know the book you're referring to but have not read it yet. What did you like about it? One of my buddies said it was good stuff. Would be a cool read to see what we did right and what can still improve on.

Posted by Jarhead 2003-10-30 11:01:17 PM|| 2003-10-30 11:01:17 PM|| Front Page Top

09:49 Anonymous4684
04:07 Bulldog
04:04 Bulldog
03:44 Bulldog
01:11 NotMikeMoore
01:08 NotMikeMoore
00:58 NotMikeMoore
00:54 NotMikeMoore
00:41 NotMikeMoore
00:39 NotMikeMoore
00:31 NotMikeMoore
00:20 NotMikeMoore
00:19 NotMikeMoore
00:16 NotMikeMoore
00:06 Jarhead
00:00 Jarhead
00:00 NotMikeMoore
23:58 Fred
23:55 Jarhead
23:54 NotMikeMoore
23:51 Jarhead
23:49 Jarhead
23:49 NotMikeMoore
23:44 NotMikeMoore