Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/03/2003 View Thu 10/02/2003 View Wed 10/01/2003 View Tue 09/30/2003 View Mon 09/29/2003 View Sun 09/28/2003 View Sat 09/27/2003
1
2003-10-03 Terror Networks
Amir Taheri: Qaeda's new course
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred Pruitt 2003-10-03 22:48|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [430 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Interesting analysis.

Look for large contributions to Democratic canidates, and the democratic party by Islamic organizations / Jihadists or their stooge organizations.

If they can get an idiot like Gepheart or Clark in the white house who will retreat from the 'miserable failure' in Iraq and Afghanistan ("yelp! yelp! yelp!" with our tail between our legs) and hand the authority to the U.N. and France (who will then surrender authority to the Jihadists) they will be all set again - with the rich Iraqi oil fields and no sanctions to fund their activities (you dont think they give a pigs eye for the Iraqi people do you?). With that kind of funding you can bet your ass they will be buying politicians around the world - particulary in the United States and United Kingdom.
Posted by GregJ 2003-10-3 11:36:50 PM||   2003-10-3 11:36:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 --America, which is regarded as "the last champion of unbelief in the world." --

????

1 billion chicoms and 1/2 bill Indians would beg to differ.
Posted by Anonymous 2003-10-4 12:43:01 AM||   2003-10-4 12:43:01 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I think it's about 1.3B chicoms and 1B Indians, though only about 800mm are non-muslim.

If the islamists really take over Pakistan they will face immediate preemptive action to destroy their nuclear capability after which India might invade.

Still, I give the islamists credit for realizing the stakes in the next election. They need us to bleed in Iraq so that Bush loses because they'll have a tough time surviving 4 more years. This is indeed a 1 issue election that reason.

It would be best for our country if both parties believed in an aggressive approach to handling the islamists. Unfortunately this is not the case (Lieberman excepted, sort of).

Right now Bush is struggling polically due to his own weak communications strategy and recent misteps coupled with the desire of the media, and perhaps even the state dept and cia, for our aggressive policy to fail so we can return to the days when de Villepin liked us. Fortunately he as a year to get it together.
Posted by JAB 2003-10-4 1:48:12 AM||   2003-10-4 1:48:12 AM|| Front Page Top

19:16 Goober Pyle
10:12 Some Old Guy
01:48 JAB
00:43 Anonymous
00:31 True German Ally
00:07 Mike Kozlowski
00:04 Dishman
23:36 GregJ
23:33 Robert Crawford
23:21 A Jackson
23:21 Old Patriot
23:14 Fred
23:10 Penguin
23:07 Super Hose
23:01 Super Hose
22:59 Super Hose
22:58 Steve
22:56 Super Hose
22:52 Old Patriot
22:51 Super Hose
22:48 Old Patriot
22:48 Ernest Brown
22:47 Super Hose
22:44 Jarhead
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com