Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/29/2003 View Wed 05/28/2003 View Tue 05/27/2003 View Mon 05/26/2003 View Sun 05/25/2003 View Sat 05/24/2003 View Fri 05/23/2003
1
2003-05-29 Iraq
Troops Find No Bodies at Saddam Site
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2003-05-29 08:42 am|| || Front Page|| [9 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 What I find interesting is that we haven't caught any of his doubles either (or at least it hasn't been announced that we have).
My personal opinion is that Saddam's working in a Burger King somewhere, alongside Elvis and Osama.
Posted by Kathy K  2003-05-29 19:02:12|| [site-essential.com/]  2003-05-29 19:02:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Perhaps he shaved off his moustache and no coalition soldier could recognize him without it. :)
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-05-29 19:57:40||   2003-05-29 19:57:40|| Front Page Top

#3 Steve, the restaurant was the second strike, I believe.

For the first strike, I thought that I heard that we had actual people on the ground reporting him there. For the second strike, I thought I heard that we had people, real-time, like on the phone, and also imaging overhead.

Saddam has spent his life ducking and dodging. 50/50 on whether we got him at his point, I'd say.
Posted by Chuck  2003-05-29 08:54:01|| [blog.simmins.org]  2003-05-29 08:54:01|| Front Page Top

#4 Chuck, the restaurant was the second strike. That's where we had a witness see him go in. We had the overhead imaging on the first strike, that's when we were told they had pictures of someone they thought was Sammy being carried out. The CIA has never said what the intel on the first strike was, only that they thought it was credible. Guess it wasn't.
Posted by Steve  2003-05-29 09:21:09||   2003-05-29 09:21:09|| Front Page Top

#5 This story is suggesting that Saddam wasn't injured on the opening night. What then to make of that first video? Was he just hungover? LOL
Posted by Dave 2003-05-29 10:54:47||   2003-05-29 10:54:47|| Front Page Top

#6 This story doesn't make sense. The 1st strike was from aircraft not Tomahawks and certainly not 40. This also doesn't mesh with the report of frantic digging and the removal of someone who was severly injured in the 1st strike. The 40 tomahawks was probably the follow up to that 1st impromptu strike. I'll say this - 40 tomahawks don't leave too many parts - probably just lots of jelly. Anyway....that's how I remember it...either that or it's dementia setting in.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2003-05-29 12:57:39||   2003-05-29 12:57:39|| Front Page Top

#7 I think that after searching for Saddam Hussein and his two sons for over a month now without coming up with anything, we have to conclude that they never existed in the first place. They were fictional people made up by the CIA as an excuse to invade Iraq.

I'll think I'll take the blue pill after all ...
Posted by A 2003-05-29 14:10:36||   2003-05-29 14:10:36|| Front Page Top

23:54 mojo
23:48 mojo
23:46 mojo
22:35 closet neo-con
21:25 Dishman
20:48 Bomb-a-rama
20:34 eric
16:34 Yosemite Sam
16:33 Alaska Paul
16:30 VRWC Colorado Chapter (Vast Right Wing Conspiracy)
16:26 ColoradoConservative
16:14 Fred
15:54 JP
15:44 Just John
15:44 Steve White
15:41 Steve White
15:35 liberalhawk
15:34 tu3031
15:32 Katz
15:30 Yosemite Sam
15:26 mojo
15:24 liberalhawk
15:22 Katz
15:15 Raj









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com