Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/14/2003 View Tue 05/13/2003 View Mon 05/12/2003 View Sun 05/11/2003 View Sat 05/10/2003 View Fri 05/09/2003 View Thu 05/08/2003
1
2003-05-14 Iraq
US Troops Soon Able to Shoot Looters on Sight
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dar 2003-05-14 10:36 am|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Still a lot of prayer needed over there, if one might take a moment.
Posted by Lucky 2003-05-14 10:56:28||   2003-05-14 10:56:28|| Front Page Top

#2 Hey now wait a minute. I don't mind the stories from DEBKA or the North Koreans, but posting an article from the NY Times really is a low point for this board. Admittedly there was a disclaimer, but Fred's got to maintain some standards.
Posted by Matt 2003-05-14 11:43:22||   2003-05-14 11:43:22|| Front Page Top

#3 The New York Times: All the news that fits, we print.
Posted by Hiryu 2003-05-14 12:32:13||   2003-05-14 12:32:13|| Front Page Top

#4 The New York Times: Oops!
U.S. military officials, under pressure because of persistent lawlessness in Iraq, insisted Wednesday they were "aggressively targeting" looters and were now holding suspects for about three weeks. They said, however, they would not authorize a shoot-to-kill policy. "We are aggressively targeting looters, but we're not going to go out and shoot children that are picking up a piece of wood out of a factory and carrying it away or a bag of cement," Maj. Gen. Buford Blount III, commander of the Army's 3rd Infantry, told reporters in Baghdad. "Our soldiers have the right to defend themselves, and have. And if a looter is carrying a weapon and the soldier feels threatened, of course he is going to engage."
Posted by Steve  2003-05-14 13:46:44||   2003-05-14 13:46:44|| Front Page Top

#5 Actually, it's basically the same thing I read in an AP article on Nando Times, so it's pretty legitimate. Even the NYT can be "accurate" about facts now and then. It's just a bit sloppy about sources, about proper atribution, and sloppy spelling and grammar.
Posted by Old Patriot  2003-05-14 14:55:00||   2003-05-14 14:55:00|| Front Page Top

#6 "Well, don't shoot ME! I don't even own a lute."
-- Fabulous Furry Freak Bros.
Posted by Anonymous 2003-05-14 15:06:34||   2003-05-14 15:06:34|| Front Page Top

09:19 Hiryu
08:51 w_r_manues@yahoo.com
08:45 w_r_manues@yahoo.com
07:43 w_r_manues@yahoo.com
07:24 w_r_manues@yahoo.com
02:27 R. McLeod
02:18 R. McLeod
02:04 R. McLeod
01:55 R. McLeod
01:48 R. McLeod
01:47 R. McLeod
01:38 R. McLeod
01:28 R. McLeod
00:27 Bomb-a-rama
23:02 mojo
22:57 mojo
22:50 Paul Moloney
22:32 The Kid
22:23 Dishman
22:03 badanov
21:57 NamVet
21:45 badanov
21:21 Fred
20:48 Aris Katsaris









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com