Article

2003-12-28 Home Front

Congressmen want Saudi Accountability Act

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2003-12-28 12:11:27 AM|| || Front Page|| [11127 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 "damage the relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia. "

ANd the fact that the main whckos in the region that attacked the US are from Saudi dint already demolishit?

Or the wild-assed Wahaabi rabblerousing and funding of terror hasnt dented things a bit?

The "Saudi-American" forum had best tend to their back yard if they want to keep us helping them instead of rolling the tanks in once we are done with Iraq.

Posted by OldSpook 2003-12-28 5:35:22 AM|| 2003-12-28 5:35:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 And we know the terrain is ideal...

Posted by .com 2003-12-28 7:16:15 AM|| 2003-12-28 7:16:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 If the Donks are smart they'll jump on this bill. Bet you could get enough votes override and thus avoid a veto.

Posted by Shipman 2003-12-28 9:26:18 AM|| 2003-12-28 9:26:18 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Meaning with 61 Senators I think Bush would actually have to sign it...

Posted by Shipman 2003-12-28 9:28:13 AM|| 2003-12-28 9:28:13 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 "If the Donks are smart they'll jump on this bill..."

"Donks"... "smart"... both words in same sentence... cognitive dissonance... head hurts... OWWW!

Who know what they'll do; they probably will support this bill, out of opposition to what they perceive (or pretend to perceive) as the Bush administration's coddling of the Saudis.

It'll be interesting to watch the progress of this bill, and who's for it and who's against it, and the administration's reaction to it. Interesting, also, is that it's Arlen Specter (R-PA) sponsoring the bill. Specter is up for re-election next year, and Bush is strongly supporting him against a more conservative challenger. Would Specter jeopardize Bush's support by introducing a bill that the administration finds anathema? My hunch is, no.

I don't think we need to worry about a presidential veto of this bill. The administration may emit a few mild, pro forma public complaints about it, but it won't be vetoed.

Frankly, I suspect the Bush administration is behind this bill in the first place. I've said a number of times that I've been expecting Bush to very gradually, but relentlessly, ratchet up the pressure on the Saudis to make radical changes in their society- like aggressively reining in the Wahhabi clerics, and criminalizing all forms of support for jihadi terrorism.

I think this bill is just one more piece in that gradual ratcheting-up.

Posted by Dave D. 2003-12-28 10:30:31 AM|| 2003-12-28 10:30:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Civics lesson, guys: The Legislative makes laws. The Executive enforces them. Congress hands W a club. It's up to him how hard to swing it. A bill to limit Presidential authority might cause a spasmodic stab at the veto button.

Posted by Glenn (not Reynolds) 2003-12-28 11:10:04 AM|| 2003-12-28 11:10:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Where's the clause outlawing foreign financial support for religious establishments in the US?

Posted by Nero 2003-12-28 1:02:01 PM|| 2003-12-28 1:02:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Here is a link to the language of the bill.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2003-12-28 1:46:37 PM|| 2003-12-28 1:46:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 "Frankly, I suspect the Bush administration is behind this bill in the first place. I've said a number of times that I've been expecting Bush to very gradually, but relentlessly, ratchet up the pressure on the Saudis to make radical changes in their society- like aggressively reining in the Wahhabi clerics, and criminalizing all forms of support for jihaditerrorism. I think this bill is just one more piece in that gradual ratcheting-up."
I definitely agree with Dave D. on this: I don't think President Bush is going to give the Saudis a pass on squat and he may be "letting" Arlen McSpecter and other members of Congress do his dirty work for him.
KLo posted this excellent in-depth analysis of the Saudi problem on NRO's the Corner:
The Saudi Paradox from Foreign Affairs Magazine which I think should be a must read for every American right now.
The author, Michael Scott Doran, points out that the (Sunni) Wahhabs are engaged in a global religious war against the Shi'ites until Judgement Day and you know what that means.
Sunni or later (Ha-ha) the Sauds are going to have to give this up or get their 72 virgins trying.
2004 and beyond promises to be an interesting year.

Posted by Jennie Taliaferro 2003-12-28 2:02:13 PM|| [http://www.greatestjeneration.com] 2003-12-28 2:02:13 PM|| Front Page Top

01:45 Rivrdog
00:30 phil_b
23:43 Les Nessman
23:34 Les Nessman
23:25 Les Nessman
23:20 Bomb-a-rama
22:34 RussSchultz
22:12 Glenn (not Reynolds)
22:01 Anonymous
21:52 Pappy
21:05 John Anderson
20:59 Cheddarhead
20:53 john
20:49 Penguin
20:47 Chuck
20:44 john
20:43 Tony (UK)
20:37 Frank G
20:30 john
20:30 Tony (UK)
20:25 NotMikeMoore
20:09 Arch
20:08 Tony (UK)
19:58 Tony (UK)