Article

2008-12-08 India-Pakistan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2008-12-08 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11135 views ] Top
File under: Govt of Pakistan

#1 This could get very interesting, methinks.

Anyone here an off-the-shelf expert on our LOC into Afghanistan, and what interruption or complication of the Pakistan route in question might mean?

Alternative route? How much comes straight up through Baluchistan, if any? In extremis, might we "secure" an alternate route, and what sort of fun might that imply?

Posted by Verlaine 2008-12-08 02:52|| 2008-12-08 02:52|| Front Page Top

#2 Coincidence with pressure being applied re Mumbai!

Posted by Paul2 2008-12-08 07:21|| 2008-12-08 07:21|| Front Page Top

#3 How's that Pak sovereignty? Looks like they can't control ANYTHING

yeah, yeah, I know, this is all ISI strategery

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2008-12-08 08:31|| 2008-12-08 08:31|| Front Page Top

#4 So, how many Indian divisions would it take to maintain the LOC?

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-12-08 09:17|| 2008-12-08 09:17|| Front Page Top

#5 I think about 80% of US/NATO supplies come through the Khyber Pass, 10% through Russian railroads, through the Stans and in through the North, and 10% Gwadar-Quetta-Kandahar.

This Strategy Page piece says it's 75% through Khyber, and that negotiations are underway to move large tonnages on the Trans-Siberian RR. From the looks of it, the Strategy Page bot harvested that info from this WaPo article.

Posted by Plastic Snoopy 2008-12-08 12:40|| 2008-12-08 12:40|| Front Page Top

#6 #4 So, how many Indian divisions would it take to maintain the LOC? Posted by: Procopius2k

Before or after the US puts a major hurt on the Pakistanis, P2K? The US should take out the Pak nukes, break a LOT of heads in Islamabad, and totally crush any large gatherings of Pakistani troops (more than six people in one place). Then Pakistan could be divided into two parts - India to the east, and Afghanistan to the west. That would unify the Pashtuns, which should please that group. It would give the Baluchis a bit of breathing room, which should please them. India would have all of Jammu & Kashmir, which should please them. Most of the madrassas would be either blasted to bits or quietly disbanded, which should allow the rest of the world to breathe a little easier. The market for fake Pakistani passports would dry up, which should help put a stop to a LOT of sh$$. ISI would disappear, which should bring the threat levels in about 20 countries down to acceptable levels. A lot of British indigents would have to make a major decision - accept British, Indian, or Afghanistani citizenship, or find themselves people wihtout a country. A group of people who have no idea how to run a modern government no longer have to worry about it. I see no drawbacks, personally.

Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot 2008-12-08 12:58|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/] 2008-12-08 12:58|| Front Page Top

#7 Its coming down to Pakistan being dismembered. Its about as integral a nation as Yugoslavia was.

ut first things first: get the nukes.

Time to undo the mistake that is Pakistan.

Posted by OldSpook 2008-12-08 14:42|| 2008-12-08 14:42|| Front Page Top

#8 But give the Paki govt one last shot: either they exert sovereignty in those tribal areas, or we will consider them to be unruled and lawless -- and therefore open to any measures we deem fit.

Posted by OldSpook 2008-12-08 14:43|| 2008-12-08 14:43|| Front Page Top

#9 It's the Russians who may tip the scales here, particularly if they get ham handed in squeezing supply lines through the former SSRs.

Old Spook, I wonder if Pakistan is even less coherent that Yugoslavia. Sure, the slavs were split three ways, or more, in confession, dialects, and ethnicity, but Marxism, under whatever variant, imposed a levelling misery across the board. The advantage of lifting that burden generally outweighed the return to more local prejudices - at least the rest of eastern europe indicates as much, while the yugo breakup ran the spectrum from relatively cordial to bad/near Rwandan.

I wonder how a Pak breakup would play out, beyond OP's outline - it seems India would reconstitute the Raj, which I suspect would be fine with many from the Punjabi and Sindh.

But the die hard leftovers really would be just that.

Still - first things first.

Posted by Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division 2008-12-08 20:06|| 2008-12-08 20:06|| Front Page Top

#10 First things first == secure and/or destroy their nuclear weapons and fissiles stocks.

Posted by OldSpook 2008-12-08 20:13|| 2008-12-08 20:13|| Front Page Top

#11 My two rupees:

1. So far, no heavy duty response from the Mumbai attacks. So ISI elements and the other terrorists think that India is weak.
2. So some ISI geniuses think that since it is the end of the Bush presidency, that it would be an opportune time to disrupt the logistical flow of materiel to Afghanistan, as they figure that the President is not going to make waves this late in his term of office.
3. Despite big talk from the Big O, they figure that he will also do nothing or the minimum.
4. The Pak army will not go seriously into the tribal regions and deal with the terrorists.
5. The Pak army will not seriously challenge the ISI and clean it up.

So they figure that this is a perfect time to create mayhem and try to run us out of Afghanistan.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2008-12-08 20:40|| 2008-12-08 20:40|| Front Page Top

#12 48 hours is up anyway you spin it.

What about supply through China?

Posted by 3dc 2008-12-08 20:58|| 2008-12-08 20:58|| Front Page Top

#13 Another terminal attacked!
Suspected militants in the Pakistani city of Peshawar have attacked another terminal holding Nato-bound equipment, the second such attack in two days.

The attackers struck the terminal on the outskirts of the city, torching up to 50 vehicles.

On Sunday a guard was killed and more than 90 lorries were set on fire when 300 gunmen attacked the first terminal.

The road from Peshawar to Afghanistan is a major supply route for US and Western forces battling the Taleban.

Lightly armed

Monday's attack took place just 2km from the scene of the first raid in the early hours of Sunday.

A security guard, Mohammad Zaman, told Reuters news agency that Monday's attackers "came just past midnight, firing in the air, sprinkled petrol on containers and then set them on fire".

"They told us they would not harm us, but they asked us not to work for the Americans," he said.

Terminals in Peshawar have only lightly armed guards who are deployed to tackle theft rather than insurgent raids.

But raids on terminals supplying US and Nato forces in Afghanistan are increasing.

The US played down Sunday's attack, saying the incident was "militarily insignificant".

But the BBC's Martin Patience in Kabul says that with 300 lorries crossing the border each day, military officials will be deeply concerned that their supply line can be disrupted in this manner.

Witnesses said Sunday's attackers destroyed 96 flat trucks and six containers.

The manager of the depot, Kifyatullah Khan, told Associated Press: "They were shouting Allahu Akbar (God is Great) and Down With America."

Security along the road leading to the border has deteriorated this year with soldiers recently carrying out an offensive in the Khyber region to drive militants away from the outskirts of Peshawar, the main city in the north-west.

Posted by 3dc 2008-12-08 22:53|| 2008-12-08 22:53|| Front Page Top

23:40 Thens Hatfield2468
23:28 Old Patriot
23:14 3dc
23:11 JosephMendiola
23:10 Fleamp Mussolini1528
23:06 Clinter Wittlesbach3525
22:56 RD
22:53 3dc
22:45 JosephMendiola
22:41 Sgt. Mom
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:29 3dc
22:29 Steve White
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:15 USN,Ret.
22:15 eLarson
22:13 eLarson
22:12 USN,Ret.
22:12 SteveS
22:11 Old Patriot
22:07 Alaska Paul
22:06 USN,Ret.
22:04 Frank G