Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 11/22/2007 View Wed 11/21/2007 View Tue 11/20/2007 View Mon 11/19/2007 View Sun 11/18/2007 View Sat 11/17/2007 View Fri 11/16/2007
1
2007-11-22 Home Front: Culture Wars
Flying Imans' case against USAir upheld; bias case can proceed
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by USN,Ret. 2007-11-22 00:00|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top
 File under: Global Jihad 

#1 Link busted. Try this.

U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery (A Clinton appointee, perhaps?)wrote that "it is dubious that these facts would lead a reasonable person to conclude that plaintiffs were about to interfere with the crew of Flight 300."
Posted by Bobby 2007-11-22 06:29||   2007-11-22 06:29|| Front Page Top

#2 It is dubious that this woman is a judge.
Posted by newc">newc  2007-11-22 08:52||   2007-11-22 08:52|| Front Page Top

#3 Montgomery, Ann D. Born 1949 in Litchfield, MN

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Nominated by William J. Clinton on November 27, 1995, to a seat vacated by Diana E. Murphy; Confirmed by the Senate on August 2, 1996, and received commission on August 6, 1996.

U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, 1994-1996

Education:
University of Kansas, B.S., 1971
University of Minnesota Law School, J.D., 1974

Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Gerard Reilly and Hon. Hubert Pair, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 1974-1975
Assistant U.S. attorney, District of Minnesota, 1976-1983
Judge, Hennepin County Municipal Court, Minnesota, 1983-1985
Judge, Hennepin County District Court, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1985-1994
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-11-22 09:19||   2007-11-22 09:19|| Front Page Top

#4 "The ruling is preliminary, but it gives a public relations victory to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which has backed the imams' claims and provided legal support"

Not! The burden for dismissal in all civil suits is intentionally set at a high threshold. Judging from the comments it appears that the Airline isn't looking for a "settlement". How much lattitude in the Discovery process the judge allows should be interesting.
Posted by DepotGuy 2007-11-22 10:58||   2007-11-22 10:58|| Front Page Top

#5 Any discovery in this case had damn well better have wide enough latitude to drive a Mack truck through it. Some of these thugs come from one of the oldest and most well established al Qaeda cells in North America.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-11-22 12:42||   2007-11-22 12:42|| Front Page Top

#6 Tell me again how USA is different from EUrope, and how significant the Jihadi casualties in Iraq/Afghanistan are.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2007-11-22 22:35||   2007-11-22 22:35|| Front Page Top

#7 The Imans may regret their case is going to discovery.

One of the problems they face is that if they lie and the lie is proved, they lose big.
Posted by mhw 2007-11-22 22:57||   2007-11-22 22:57|| Front Page Top

23:53 smn
23:34 JosephMendiola
23:33 Woozle Grereck5422
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:12 JosephMendiola
23:08 JosephMendiola
23:04 Zenster
23:02 mojo
23:00 Woozle Grereck5422
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:57 mhw
22:50 JosephMendiola
22:50 Woozle Grereck5422
22:46 Zenster
22:43 g(r)omgoru
22:40 Zenster
22:39 Woozle Grereck5422
22:35 g(r)omgoru
22:32 g(r)omgoru
22:23 g(r)omgoru
21:46 Frank G
21:26 Angique Gonque2974
21:26 Zenster
21:20 Zenster









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com