Article

2006-11-18 Home Front: Politix

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by .com 2006-11-18 03:02|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Hoyer's victory is already being portrayed as a humiliating defeat for Pelosi, which it was. But it would have been an even greater defeat for Pelosi to push Murtha through and then suffer the consequences of her own idiotic decision. I doubt she understands that.

The danger now is that Pelosi will honor that promise, creating precisely the same impression that she threatened to create with Murtha, i.e. that House Democrats who engage in bad behavior but manage to escape indictment or beat the rap in court are welcome to positions of high responsibility. In the case of Hastings, we lack videotape, and the evidence is circumstantial. Nonetheless, it is still, as Marcus wrote, "too much to explain away"

If this is any indicator of what to expect from democrats over the next two years, I'd say that the 2008 presidential race is completely wide open.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2006-11-18 04:39|| 2006-11-18 04:39|| Front Page Top

#2 ...I'm of really mixed emotions here. I think we're about to find out just how far out of her depth Grandma Marxist really is when she tries to appoint REP Hastings to run the House Intelligence Committee - after all, Napoleon said "Never interrupt your enemies when they are making mistakes." OTOH, the fact is that Hastings - as an impeached Federal judge - is a convicted felon. Were he applying for a GS or military job that involved the handling of classified material and getting a security clearance, he couldn't do it. - and I unfortunately have no doubt that REP Hastings' first actions in charge of the HIC will be to leak as much as he can to anybody he can.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2006-11-18 08:42|| 2006-11-18 08:42|| Front Page Top

#3 ...and I unfortunately have no doubt that REP Hastings' first actions in charge of the HIC will be to leak as much as he can to anybody he can.

But, for a price, of course!

Posted by Mick Dundee 2006-11-18 09:27|| 2006-11-18 09:27|| Front Page Top

#4 correct, Mick. Alcee's a crook, not a spy. The Chicoms will have to pay cold cash for secrets, which will decrease our trade deficit with them. See, he's doing a public service.

Democrats began fretting that they were about to erase all distinctions between themselves and the Abramoff-tainted Republicans

apparently Noah doesn't read the papers. Hello, Harry Reid! Waiting for the other shoe to fall on the "eight or nine" Democrat senators

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-11-18 09:43|| 2006-11-18 09:43|| Front Page Top

#5 Hastings - as an impeached Federal judge - is a convicted felon. Were he applying for a GS or military job that involved the handling of classified material and getting a security clearance, he couldn't do it. - and I unfortunately have no doubt that REP Hastings' first actions in charge of the HIC will be to leak as much as he can to anybody he can.

I agree, Mike K. Hastings' potential appointment should represent grounds for Pelosi's (and his own) removal. This is simply outrageous.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2006-11-18 11:30|| 2006-11-18 11:30|| Front Page Top

#6 He was impeached and convicted by the Senate, but not in court and not even by the full Senate. He was acquitted in his criminal trial. Wiki. So...

The fact is, he's not a felon.

Posted by .com 2006-11-18 11:37|| 2006-11-18 11:37|| Front Page Top

#7 he's being pushed by the Black Caucus, strictly due to his race. They should be ashamed, but with a group containing Conyers, Waters, Rangel, et al, shame, patriotism, and conscience is not a factor. Black first

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-11-18 11:41|| 2006-11-18 11:41|| Front Page Top

#8 The Black Caucus will be dead along with the rest of us. They don't believe we're in a war, you see.

I hope to see a Pelosi-Hildebeast cat fight.

Posted by SR-71 2006-11-18 11:54|| 2006-11-18 11:54|| Front Page Top

#9 Right, .Com. The Senate convicted and removed him, but the criminal court jury acquitted him. The sad thing is that the articles of impeachment did not included any disqualification clauses, as specifically allowed by the Constitution, and so he was able to run for his House seat.

Posted by Eric Jablow">Eric Jablow 2006-11-18 13:09|| 2006-11-18 13:09|| Front Page Top

#10 But only as a democrat. All corruption, all the time, your democrat party.
Hey, felons need representation too.

Posted by wxjames 2006-11-18 17:37|| 2006-11-18 17:37|| Front Page Top

#11 RE: # 7 - the exception to the rule was Michael Steele, a Maryland Republican candidate for US Senate, who did not gather a great number of black voters, and lost the election.

He was just too republican - an Oreo. For our overseas readers, that's "black on the outside and white in the middle", like an Oreo sandwich cookie.

Posted by Bobby 2006-11-18 18:06|| 2006-11-18 18:06|| Front Page Top

#12 .com,
Respectfully sir, I'm going to disagree with you. An impeachment - whether by the Senate or the full house - is still a Federal conviction, or at least that's the way I've always been taught. We might end up agreeing to disagree on this one.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2006-11-18 18:43|| 2006-11-18 18:43|| Front Page Top

#13 The fact is, he's not a felon.

Facts! Shmacts!

Look, .com, I've already made up my mind. So there!

Posted by Almost Anonymous5839">Almost Anonymous5839 2006-11-18 20:33|| 2006-11-18 20:33|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:54 JosephMendiola
23:27 trailing wife
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:14 BA
22:55 BA
22:55 gorb
22:55 JosephMendiola
22:53 gorb
22:47 SteveS
22:39 KBK
22:34 JosephMendiola
22:34 Scooter McGruder
22:26 JosephMendiola
22:19 Mark Z
22:07 Iblis
21:46 RD
21:42 trailing wife
21:36 gorb
21:32 Steve White
21:31 trailing wife
21:16 Mick Dundee
21:15 gorb
21:12 MU