Article

2006-11-07 Terror Networks

Memri : Iraqi Sunnis Claim Documents Reveal Pre 9/11 Iran/Al Qaida Contacts

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-11-07 06:12|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 But, but, AlQ is Sunni and Iran is Shia and the two would NEVER cooperate!!!!

At least that was what I was told.

That's why AlQ would NEVER have any contact with Saddam cause he was secular and not a Wahabbi nut job.

That's why Stalin would NEVER make a deal with Hit......... oh, never mind.

Posted by AlanC">AlanC 2006-11-07 08:56|| 2006-11-07 08:56|| Front Page Top

#2 And feminist groups in the US would never support an Islamofascist regime over our President.

Posted by Jackal">Jackal 2006-11-07 09:19|| http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html] 2006-11-07 09:19|| Front Page Top

#3 I wished Bush had targeted Iran instead of Iraq because imo they are the biggest regional threat and by taking them out you take out Syria,Hizbullah and possibly Hamas!!!!

Posted by Cheregum Crelet7867 2006-11-07 09:32|| 2006-11-07 09:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Goal posts moved, doesn't matter.

Posted by anonymous2u 2006-11-07 09:45|| 2006-11-07 09:45|| Front Page Top

#5 Cheregrum

If we had hit Iran first think about that. We would advance from were? Kuwait into Iran? Leaving Kuwait as our staging area to push into Iran with a very well known hostile Iraq at our rear flank in position to cut our supply base lines at the most opportune time? Not to mention the Sunni/Shia would be as one. Or hell say old Saddam only used that temporary weakness to hit the Kurds and Syria/Hezbollah hit Isreal would Iraq not join in against US?

Its called strategic position. We hit Saddam the weak link in the chain by doing that we split thier line Syria,Hezbollah/Iran and gave US a staging area Iraq to hit either one Syria or Iran from. Iraq has a huge border with large air bases that are already secured now and garanteed our use in a war for now anyway. Iraq was the choice of battle field in WW2 we didn't hit Vichy France N Africa aka Algeria for the hell of it we knew that that we were our weakest at the intitial invasion and staging. To land like in Normandy with German forces thier to meet US we went for the weak point and hit vichy France Algeria. That move saved thousands from needless death.

Bush didn't sell Iraq as such but that is what it is a strategic choice of battle field in our WOT that by nessecity at some point will go through Tehran. Bush couldn't sell gold coins for free so that really doesn't suprise me in the least. The guy has the right idea and some balls but 0 ability to talk and rally the people.

Posted by C-Low 2006-11-07 10:59|| 2006-11-07 10:59|| Front Page Top

#6 warns that utmost caution must be taken in maintaining ties with Al-Qaeda, since such ties, if revealed, could have "irreversible negative consequences" for Iran.

It's high time to put in place those "irreversible negative consequences". Iran is the spider at the center of one of terrorism's biggest webs. (Saudi Arabia is at the other one's center.)

we had models of the [WTC] two towers, the White House, the Pentagon, and the CIA building at Langley.

This cannot possibly be mere coincidence. If true, it is the smoking gun of foreknowledge and solid proof of Iran's complicity in 9-11. They ought to be nuked for it but simply bombing them back to the stone age will have to suffice.

Bush didn't sell Iraq as such but that is what it is a strategic choice of battle field in our WOT that by nessecity at some point will go through Tehran. Bush couldn't sell gold coins for free so that really doesn't suprise me in the least. The guy has the right idea and some balls but 0 ability to talk and rally the people.

This is becoming evermore apparent. Woebetide the republicans today if this represents the pivot point of America's decision about who leads this nation. Iran's potential complicity in 9-11 should have been trumpeted all across this nation once their pursuit of nuclear weapons became an issue. Had this been done, there would be much less opposition to bouncing the rubble that was once Iran.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2006-11-07 11:54|| 2006-11-07 11:54|| Front Page Top

#7 Good post C-Low.

I hope you are correct

Posted by Cheregum Crelet7867 2006-11-07 11:54|| 2006-11-07 11:54|| Front Page Top

18:03 colored voter
16:20 Angavins
16:04 A Democratic Vote
15:59 Vote! Support our troops!
15:53 A Democratic Vote
15:52 DEMOCRATS TO VICTORY!
15:40 ****VOTE****
15:39 *DEMOCRAT*
15:40 *************
15:32 Glealet Flaviting8567
15:29 Photh Ebbutle2361
15:27 Hibjobol Abjub
15:15 Hibjobol Abjub
14:57 Hibjobol Abjub
14:10 Hibjobol Abjub
23:59 Lancasters Over Dresden
23:58 OldSpook
23:57 Lancasters Over Dresden
23:56 Lancasters Over Dresden
23:52 Lancasters Over Dresden
23:50 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:50 Lancasters Over Dresden
23:46 anonymous2u
23:46 Rex Mundi