Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 11/04/2003 View Mon 11/03/2003 View Sun 11/02/2003 View Sat 11/01/2003 View Fri 10/31/2003 View Thu 10/30/2003 View Wed 10/29/2003
1
2003-11-04 Middle East
Yassin: Hudna under aggression means surrender
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred Pruitt 2003-11-04 23:09|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 "favored males to launch such operations while females would be left as a reserve army"

and to show a blind old cleric a little tender attention when the Med turns cold, eh?
Posted by Frank G  2003-11-3 11:13:54 PM||   2003-11-3 11:13:54 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 The Sheikh said that it was natural for Al-Qaeda to declare war on the USA as long as the latter had declared war on Al-Qaeda but said that his Movement would not join Al-Qaeda in its operations.

Waitaminnit. Didn't binnie "declare war" against the US years before 9-11?
Posted by Robert Crawford  2003-11-4 10:29:50 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2003-11-4 10:29:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 This is all easy for Yassin to talk about, as his ass isn't the one in immediate danger. I'd bet that if Yassin starts to experience a number of close calls like the previous one, he'd be singing a slightly different tune.
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2003-11-4 10:32:11 AM||   2003-11-4 10:32:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 I like that - "granting" a hudna to the JOOOOOOOS - like it means anything, and they're doing Israel a big favor. Mighty white of 'em.

Kill more "sheiks", that's the ticket.
Posted by mojo  2003-11-4 11:06:59 AM||   2003-11-4 11:06:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Remember the definition of "Hudna" folks: A strategic cessation of hostilities in order to rebuild strength for a renewed push. Mohammed put THAT spin on that word himself. For example, the pauses between the trench assaults in WW I were mini-hudnas. It is NOT a truce, but a temporary ceasefire.

Thus, for Yassin to say "that no hudna (truce) with the Zionist enemy was feasible at the present stage." is him really saying, "The damn Joooos are on to what a Hudna is, so we can't pull the wool over their eyes again. Curse their moustaches!"

Remember the old saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
Posted by Ptah  2003-11-4 1:48:53 PM|| [http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2003-11-4 1:48:53 PM|| Front Page Top

00:43 Old Patriot
00:18 NotMikeMoore
00:14 Julius
00:05 Julius
23:57 Ralph
23:46 mojo
23:28 Julius
23:15 NotMikeMoore
23:15 Yank
23:14 Grunter
23:11 NotMikeMoore
23:00 Aris Katsaris
22:53 chriskarma
22:30 Alaska Paul
22:25 Stephen
22:18 Alaska Paul
22:09 Frank G
22:07 Alaska Paul
22:06 Frank G
22:03 Frank G
22:03 Cyber Sarge
21:59 eLarson
21:52 eLarson
21:48 someone









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com