Article

2003-11-15 Fifth Column

Greenpeices - Thrown in jail for ship tresspassing

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Jarhead 2003-11-15 2:39:34 PM|| || Front Page|| [11127 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 selective use of a 1800's law, huh? Well, I would guess that should their storming of a cargo ship have occurred in the 1800's they might have been lucky to have seen land again, ever.... this is a shot across the bow - take their tax-exempt status...and Jesse Jackson's too ...time to make the laws work for the right as well

Posted by Frank G 2003-11-15 2:51:09 PM|| 2003-11-15 2:51:09 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 YES!

I love how these idiots commit crimes and then claim it's "free speech".

Posted by Robert Crawford 2003-11-15 2:53:31 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2003-11-15 2:53:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 These idiots make a lot of us who actually truly care about the environment look bad. As soon as I saw the ACLU in there I had to post this crap.

Posted by Jarhead 2003-11-15 2:57:49 PM|| 2003-11-15 2:57:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Why can't they be charged with piracy? Also, the article never mentions if the mahogany was onboard- was it? Doesn't sound like it, sounds like these assholes screwed the goat. And why aren't they protesting Brazil instead of the U.S.?

Oh, and burning down buildings and Hummers isn't 'free speech', it's vandalism bordering on terrorism.

Posted by chargethemwithpiracy 2003-11-15 3:34:18 PM|| 2003-11-15 3:34:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Oops, sorry, didn't read the last para, it DID have mahogany onboard. Why are we doing that? I can't stand greenterrorists, but they have a point.

Posted by chargethemwithpiracy 2003-11-15 3:37:04 PM|| 2003-11-15 3:37:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 I can't stand greenterrorists, but they have a point.

Unfortunately, their point is located at the top of their heads.

Posted by badanov 2003-11-15 3:50:26 PM|| [http://www.rkka.org] 2003-11-15 3:50:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 About 50 members of the political organization, The Sons of Liberty, boarded 3 ships in Boston Harbor. Some were dressed, not very convincingly, as Mohawk Indians. In a very orderly and quiet fashion, they plunked [sterling]9,659 worth of Darjeeling into the sea...

Tread lightly here...

Posted by True German Ally 2003-11-15 3:54:38 PM|| 2003-11-15 3:54:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 TGA -- Sorry, there's no comparison. The Boston Tea Party was about eliminating a tyranny; the Greens are about instituting one.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2003-11-15 4:06:39 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2003-11-15 4:06:39 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 "Tread lightly here..."

Screw off. The green terrorists are always accusing the conservatives of 'wrapping themselves in the flag', but they sure do want to claim SOME KIND of legitimacy by doing the same, don't they? They consider murderous swine like Mao, Guevera, and OBL to be 'George Washingtons'. They can all go suck it.

Posted by Anonymous 2003-11-15 4:09:26 PM|| 2003-11-15 4:09:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 TGA - I have some doubt the Boston Tea Party would've been dealt with lightly like this had the perpetrators been caught

Posted by Frank G 2003-11-15 4:16:06 PM|| 2003-11-15 4:16:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Frank G, I know. (The Bostoners did destroy property btw.)

Which is exactly the difference between a tyranny and a free democracy.

I'm not exactly a fan of Greenpeace but sometimes they do raise legitimate issues and a peaceful protest (as annoying as it may have been to some) may be something like a misdemeanour but please let's not place people who unfurl some banners on a ship with people who bomb skyscrapers and synagogues.

A non violent sit in is not a "criminal conspiracy" even if bending some dusty law makes it one.

Posted by True German Ally 2003-11-15 4:34:41 PM|| 2003-11-15 4:34:41 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 TGA you have to remember it was Tea... if a shipload of was whiskey tossed into the inner harbor it would have been a different story.

PS. The great hymn Shall We Gather At The River was based on just such an action.

Posted by Shipman 2003-11-15 5:05:49 PM|| 2003-11-15 5:05:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Which is exactly the difference between a tyranny and a free democracy.

I think that's a bit simplistic, TGA. "Democracy" doesn't mean politically-motivated individuals have the right to act as if a law unto themselves. That's more like anarchy. Whenever someone or some group's actions cause monetary harm to another individual, group or company, the injured party has a right to expect compensation from, and/or punishment for, the perpetrators. Boarding a cargo ship with intent to cause disruption is not a "victimless crime", and whatever the motivation, they have no right to complain if their saboteurial actions result in punitive consequences.

Posted by Bulldog 2003-11-15 5:09:30 PM|| 2003-11-15 5:09:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 Bulldog, there is always a fine line...

"Convinced the ship was hauling contraband mahogany from Brazil"... thats what the article says.

Now from what I read that ship DID carry contraband mahogany (and US authorities turning a blind eye to it?) so you argument of monetary harm might be a bit thin on the ground. Seems like a matter of priority to me.

Sometimes you have to chose between two evils. And look at the whole matter.

Nobody punishes a firefighter for knocking down a door in order to save a house. Greenpeace may not qualify for the comparison but as I said... tread lightly.

Shipman, whiskey would never have been tossed into the water, it would have been destroyed with a more "personal" effort!

Posted by True German Ally 2003-11-15 5:35:49 PM|| 2003-11-15 5:35:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 But TGA, a fireman isn't a vigilante. There may be a fine line between drawing attention to criminal activity in this way and committing criminal activity yourself, but what you seem to be propounding is a blurring of the line, or a nudging of the line, because of the motives behind the actions of this group. And I don't believe that 'good' motives excuse bad behaviour.

I sympathise with their campaign to stem the trade in endangered wood, but in carrying it out their in this way, when there are many other ways of doing it, they make themselves liable to prosecution. Perhaps they'd enjoy being 'martyrs' to their cause, but is it fair to honest shipping to allow Greenpeace's eco-pirates freeedom of the seas, to go boarding vessels at will?!

Posted by Bulldog 2003-11-15 6:06:44 PM|| 2003-11-15 6:06:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 First of all, was it contraband, or legitimately purchased? Brazil isn't the only nation that grows mahogany trees - most of South and Central America do also. Secondly, was it legitimately purchased, or black market. They "suspected", but did they know? IF they're just out to cause trouble, hoping to force someone to give up trading in a legitimate cargo because they don't want that cargo traded in, then they should all be hanged from the ship's railing as a warning to the next group. If it was indeed contraband, duly recognized as such by both the exporting and importing country, the US should have seized it and the ship. That didn't happen. Makes me wonder what all the particulars are in this case, and why they're not all being discussed. The article is written as if something illegal was being done. However, unless the laws of two nations involved were broken, it was Greenpeace that was the agressor, and should get their teeth handed to them on a plate. I'd want to know a lot more before I accepted the words in this article as 100% Gospel truth.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-11-15 7:14:51 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2003-11-15 7:14:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#17 Bulldog, as I said, I'm not exactly excusing them but asking to consider the whole case. To dig out a dusty law so you can whack them doesn't sound right to me.

Blurring the line, maybe. Sometimes it's hard to see the line, especially in a twilight zone.

Let's assume the ship was not carrying timber but... marihuana (and the authorities still turning their backs)... where is the line? Cocaine? (pardon the pun).

I'm a firm advocate of respecting the law (of free democratic societies). But then again even in the U.S. laws exist that are questionable and some of them have only been abolished because some people chose to break them in public.

All I'm asking for is not to put people in a boat with "terrorists" who clearly do not qualify. Saving the rain forest is saving the lung of our Earth... I think that beats the lost dollars of timber smugglers hands down.

Greenpeace's actions may sometimes be questionable (they seem to need these spectacular acts to get the attention), their political views might not be yours or mine but the basic idea that the Earth is a precious gift that we should not put to waste for some extra dollars is not a terrorist one.

Posted by True German Ally 2003-11-15 7:19:01 PM|| 2003-11-15 7:19:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#18 Old Patriot, as it seems Greenpeace did not board this ship out of a whim.. they have been monitoring illegal mahogany trade for years so you might at least give them the benefit of the doubt that they knew what they were doing. The Brazilian president Cardoso banned the mahogany trade and president Bush has publicly spoken out against it. So I think Greenpeace has a point, and unfortunately in our media society the point gets across more easily with a media friendly action.

Most of the (laudable) achievements of Greenpeace involved breaking (or bending) laws at some point. Remember how Greenpeace fought against French nuclear testing in Mururoa? Against whaling? Oh they boarded quite a few whaling ships and succeeded in protecting the whales because commercial whaling was banned after these spectacular (and at some point law breaking) actions.

The firefighter analogy isn't that far fetched. If you hear a child screaming in the neighbor's apartment and you have reasons to believe that the child is abused, then nobody will prosecute you for trying to stop it. Even if you break a law by doing it.

Posted by True German Ally 2003-11-15 7:39:06 PM|| 2003-11-15 7:39:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#19 ...as it attempted to draw attention to the mahogany shipment,

Heh heh, he said hog...

Posted by Raj 2003-11-15 9:26:19 PM|| [http://angrycyclist.blogspot.com] 2003-11-15 9:26:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#20 TGA is full of it. All this talk about nonviolent protest for a great 'cause' is dung. Holding a pro life sign within 100 feet of Planned UnParenthood's abortion chambers during the Reno/Clinton reign of terror meant getting slapped with a felony charge under RICO and DECADES of jail time. And these panty waist perverts want to screw a precious mahogany tree. What dung! Here's an idea - let's apply the law equally. You don't look at someone's motive to decide whether to enforce the law!!

Posted by Pro Life 2003-11-15 9:33:24 PM|| 2003-11-15 9:33:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#21 TGA is full of it.

I disagree. I respect allefforts for environmental preservation. As a civil engineer/project manager I can attest to the ways those protections have been bastardized to stop projects/progress (IMHO); AP can tell a similar tale. These freaks are one step from the ELF bastards and should be slammed hard! They have a safe refuge in our courts system and I respect when they play by the rules, as I am bound to do.....otherwise, smack the trust-funds of these weasels and make them earn a living!

Posted by Frank G 2003-11-15 9:45:00 PM|| 2003-11-15 9:45:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#22 Remember action/consequences principle. Right or wrong, the Greenpiecers boarded a ship without permission. They may be protesters, they may be pirates. Action against them is up to the master and the owner. If the Greenpiecers are doing this on principle, then fine, they must face the consequences, which includes getting shot, arrested, jailed, and possibly losing their tax exempt status. They played their hand and they will have to live with it. They ought to lose their tax exempt status, and so should the ACLU.

The Sons of Liberty got away with the act. Great, but they could have got caught and jailed or hung. They took the chance and won against the Crown.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2003-11-15 11:04:24 PM|| 2003-11-15 11:04:24 PM|| Front Page Top

00:32 NotMikeMoore
07:24 B
06:26 B
03:54 Edog
03:42 Edog
02:54 Jennie Taliaferro
01:28 Anonymous
00:03 eLarson
23:34 RMcLeod
23:13 Alaska Paul
23:04 Alaska Paul
22:15 Steve White
21:55 RMcLeod
21:45 Frank G
21:38 manyoso
21:33 Pro Life
21:26 Raj
21:12 Raj
20:51 Dishman
20:35 Charles
20:32 Rafael
20:28 Charles
20:26 Charles
20:04 Aris Katsaris