Article

2014-11-07 Great White North

Canada Introduces Law Banning Polygamist Immigrants

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by trailing wife 2014-11-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11127 views ] Top

#1 Stand by for exploding Mormons.

Posted by Shipman 2014-11-07 06:09|| 2014-11-07 06:09|| Front Page Top

#2 Oh, so the other two wymns, both preggies.... are your sisters? Here are your passports, I'm afraid you'll have to be on the next thing smoking out of here. We're don't do baby factories.

Posted by Besoeker 2014-11-07 06:13|| 2014-11-07 06:13|| Front Page Top

#3 "barbaric cultural practices."

This could be anything. It could be lack of interest in ice hockey. Non-drinkers. Cultures that don't eat bacon.

Posted by BrerRabbit 2014-11-07 11:47|| 2014-11-07 11:47|| Front Page Top

#4 CanadaIntroduces Law Banning Polygamist

Next they will be banning Canibbles - Do you eat or nibble food which comes from a can? Well, you are a canibble.

Posted by Woodrow Thud3213 2014-11-07 13:12|| 2014-11-07 13:12|| Front Page Top

#5 "No mo Mons!"

Posted by Skidmark 2014-11-07 14:14|| 2014-11-07 14:14|| Front Page Top

#6 Speaking as one of the two participants in a still surviving marriage of nearly 52 years and counting, I cannot even IMAGINE the stress of having more than one spouse.

Posted by Canuckistan sniper 2014-11-07 16:09|| 2014-11-07 16:09|| Front Page Top

#7 An idea whose time has come.

Posted by JohnQC 2014-11-07 16:47|| 2014-11-07 16:47|| Front Page Top

#8 Spouse hell CS, multiple in-laws????????!!!!

I don't know about you old folks, I've only got 36 yrs (still counting) under my belt......on the second attempt, but those in-laws were definitely problematic.

Posted by AlanC 2014-11-07 18:04|| 2014-11-07 18:04|| Front Page Top

#9 Guess I am among the lucky ones. Got it right first time out of the box; 41 and counting, with the same Spousal Unit.

Posted by USN, Ret. 2014-11-07 18:17|| 2014-11-07 18:17|| Front Page Top

23:26 SteveS
23:15 Skidmark
23:11 anon1
23:11 Skidmark
23:09 Skidmark
23:09 anon1
23:02 Skidmark
22:34 Frank G
22:21 Glavick Sninerong5546
22:14 Frank G
22:12 Glavick Sninerong5546
22:12 49 Pan
21:54 Pappy
21:50 49 Pan
21:44 Glavick Sninerong5546
21:40 Frank G
21:35 JosephMendiola
21:30 JosephMendiola
21:27 3dc
21:22 3dc
21:21 Injun Ulomoque8628
21:20 Frank G
21:04 Frank G
20:55 OldSpook