Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 10/11/2005 View Mon 10/10/2005 View Sun 10/09/2005 View Sat 10/08/2005 View Fri 10/07/2005 View Thu 10/06/2005 View Wed 10/05/2005
1
2005-10-11 Iraq
M1126 Strykers in Combat: Experiences & Lessons
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-10-11 08:41|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Sounds like a wonderful start. The laser finder mated with a stabilized gun would be awsome.
Posted by mmurray821 2005-10-11 09:09||   2005-10-11 09:09|| Front Page Top

#2 Speaking of Stryker has anyone heard any recent news about how the MGS variant is going?
Posted by Phil Fraering 2005-10-11 09:25||   2005-10-11 09:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Let's not "HumVee" the Stryker to death. We have people movers with larger guns and laser range finders. They're call Bradly's. Let's allow specialty vehicles to remain specialty vehicles.
Posted by Chuck Simmins">Chuck Simmins  2005-10-11 09:38|| http://blog.simmins.org]">[http://blog.simmins.org]  2005-10-11 09:38|| Front Page Top

#4 The stryker can go places the bradly can't. With a stable gun and range finder 25mm gun it would be even better. Options are always good for vehicles since there is no one size fits all. Make it easily modded in the field by the grunts it moves and you have a winner.
Posted by mmurray821 2005-10-11 10:12||   2005-10-11 10:12|| Front Page Top

#5 Could somebody post a link to milblogers?Thought I had put it in favorites,but can't find it.I was over there the other day and started reading one of the bloggers and was enthralled(hope thats the word I want).He was describing his experience in the Battle of Fallugah.
Posted by raptor 2005-10-11 10:49||   2005-10-11 10:49|| Front Page Top

#6 Guys, I was thinking about the version with the 105mm gun.

It was supposed to be part of the program to begin with.

The last news I read, the guys in the field were _asking_ for it, but it's several years behind schedule.

It wasn't a standard model, but a "fire support" model not meant to carry crew around. The idea was that you'd have all these different vehicles built on the same drivetrain.

In lieu of that, they're using M-1's (when available) or using TOW missiles against bunkers or reinforced buildings (such as when Uday and Qusay were killed).

Maybe they just need to transfer some M-1's to provide fire support, I don't know.
Posted by Phil Fraering 2005-10-11 11:16||   2005-10-11 11:16|| Front Page Top

#7 Ack... I meant "troops" when I wrote "crew" above.
Posted by Phil Fraering 2005-10-11 12:12||   2005-10-11 12:12|| Front Page Top

#8 Wasn't the Stryker Gen. Shinseki's baby?

Though it bugged me that he was the darling of the Kerry campaign during the election the fact is that he was right about the Stryker, arguably right about troop levels needed for the Army, especially in Iraq and no harm seems to have been done by changing the uniform or the 'Army of One' campaigns for which he drew criticism. Props to the General.
Posted by JAB 2005-10-11 14:40||   2005-10-11 14:40|| Front Page Top

23:37 DMFD
23:37 Chaising Thromosh3254
23:32 DMFD
23:26 Vlad the Muslim Impaler
23:24 Barbara Skolaut
23:16 Bardo
23:13 RWV
23:12 Elmeamble Sneatle3802
23:11 DMFD
23:09 DMFD
23:00 Elmeamble Sneatle3802
22:57 Witt
22:56 Comic-book Guy
22:55 Captain America
22:51 Elmeamble Sneatle3802
22:51 Captain America
22:49 raptor
22:48 Witt
22:47 Captain America
22:47 RWV
22:47 JosephMendiola
22:46 Captain America
22:46 Witt
22:43 raptor









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com