Article

2007-09-02 Olde Tyme Religion

Scholars mull encoding of Islamic rules of gov't

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Seafarious 2007-09-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11128 views ] Top
File under: Global Jihad

#1 Why all the fuss? I don't think it should be too hard to get it to fit it on one sheet of toilet paper.

Posted by gorb 2007-09-02 02:01|| 2007-09-02 02:01|| Front Page Top

#2 "Al Kuds" is of course the rip off of the Hebrew "el-Kadish" (the Holy) designation of Jerusalem. There is no record of a single Caliphate EVER having visited that city. It had limited significance to Muslims until the foundation of Israel. Arab leaders did NOT visit it from the foundation up to the Israeli capture of 1967.

The cardinal principle of Islamic governance is: deceit.

I have been spreading the word that Obama is named after the parrot headed winged horse ("Barack") that Islam's phony "prophet" supposedly flew to "el-Kadish" during his "night journey to heaven and hell." People need to know both that and the fact that he was a Muslim indoctrinate up to the age of 9, at least. (By the way, on the "night journey" the "prophet" saw his parent's "heads boiling" in hell, and asked Gabriel to plead with allah to place them in a spot where they would only simmer. What would Freud make of that tale?)

Posted by McZoid 2007-09-02 02:24|| 2007-09-02 02:24|| Front Page Top

#3 Amman - Muslim scholars and political and legal experts from 20 countries started a conference here Saturday to discuss possible mechanisms of encoding the Islamic principles, values and philosophy of government....~~and moving to Salt Lake City.~~

Posted by Besoeker 2007-09-02 03:32|| 2007-09-02 03:32|| Front Page Top

#4 the Hebrew "el-Kadish" (the Holy) designation of Jerusalem.

Could that be Aramaic, McZoid? My Hebrew is very rusty, but it seems to me that Yerushalayim ha-Kadesh (accent on the final syllable) would be more correct...

Posted by trailing wife 2007-09-02 09:39|| 2007-09-02 09:39|| Front Page Top

#5 It is precisely gatherings of this sort that merit a liberal application of cruise missiles. These are the leading experts in how to implement Islamic theocracy. The gathered individuals represent some of Islam's biggest movers and shakers for entrenching shari'a law in Muslim societies. They are the devout enemies of freedom and all human liberty.

High context Islamic cultures are exceptionally dependent upon the pronouncements of such authorities. Scholars of this sort have built up generations of personal connections to obtain this sort of recognition and positions of power. By striking an assemblage of this sort we could cripple a huge portion of Islam's ability to issue edicts and fatwan that are so necessary for moving shari'a implementation forward.

I'll ask you to please note the topic of, "trans-border guidelines of government in Islamic and Arab countries". This is a naked reference to establishment of a pan-Arab caliphate. Those who seek a caliphate represent the West's primary and most virulent enemies. Killing scores of them at a single stroke would send the much needed message to this world's Muslim community. Namely, "Those who plot to make Islam the dominant global force will DIE."

human rights in Islam

They utter this tortured oxymoron with a straight face. It is the face of EVIL.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-09-02 14:53|| 2007-09-02 14:53|| Front Page Top

#6 This would be a blueprint for a new Dark Age. Maybe Francis Fukuyama did not have it right after all - we are not at the end of political evolution where the trend toward the establishment and widening of liberal, capitalistic democracies is irresistable.

It was easier to discredit Communism than the toxic, murderous cult of Islam - Communism had real pretensions about creating a better world which could be disproven scientifically and factually. Islam simplistically enforces unquestioning obedience to primitivism and superstition. There is no easy way to win a debate against such an irrational mindset.

Posted by Grumenk Philalzabod0723 2007-09-02 15:20|| 2007-09-02 15:20|| Front Page Top

#7 There is no easy way to win a debate against such an irrational mindset.

Actually, there is but only in the sense of how a Smith & Wesson beats four aces.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-09-02 16:41|| 2007-09-02 16:41|| Front Page Top

23:53 Zenster
23:45 Frank G
23:30 twobyfour
23:27 KBK
23:19 Frank G
23:19 Barbara Skolaut
23:18 gromgoru
23:13 twobyfour
23:11 twobyfour
23:10 KBK
23:08 Frank G
22:58 KBK
22:56 twobyfour
22:50 Old Patriot
22:39 James
22:32 twobyfour
22:20 Ptah
22:19 WTF
22:15 Frank G
22:15 WTF
22:10 KBK
22:02 Frank G
21:59 KBK
21:46 Frank G