Article

2006-08-21 Britain

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Rob Crawford 2006-08-21 07:39|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Mr. Massari makes several distinctions that he says insulate him from being deported or prosecuted by the British government. He says, for instance, that he does not post any material on the Web site himself; he lets his members do that, most of whom sign up anonymously. The other important distinction, he said, is that he does not call for violence in Britain.

So, basically, he's just another noisy Jihadi pussy who doesn't want to end up rooming with Omar Bakri back in Beirut?
Talks the Walk and Walks the Talk...

Posted by tu3031 2006-08-21 09:58|| 2006-08-21 09:58|| Front Page Top

#2 The British government ought to translate this garbage daily and repost it. Make it well known to the public where to access it so they know how the Muzzies they've coddled and allowed to remain in Britain on the dole really feel. These pice of crap Muzzies are already demanding to take over the whole country, just like in France. Do they remain unaware or just unconcerned ?

Posted by SOP35/Rat 2006-08-21 11:06|| 2006-08-21 11:06|| Front Page Top

#3 Translate it and give their home address in case anyone want to provide a "rebuttal."

Posted by Cyber Sarge 2006-08-21 12:50|| 2006-08-21 12:50|| Front Page Top

#4 A whole lotta shaken goin on

Posted by Captain America 2006-08-21 13:02|| 2006-08-21 13:02|| Front Page Top

#5 Key phrase in the article:

an Irish-born convert to Islam

This is why profiling is not going to work for e.g. air safety.

Posted by lotp 2006-08-21 13:21|| 2006-08-21 13:21|| Front Page Top

#6 #5 Key phrase in the article:

an Irish-born convert to Islam

This is why profiling is not going to work for e.g. air safety.

Well...it's certainly true that profiling won't prevent all attempts at terrorism, but I don't believe that we should make the perfect the enemy of the good.

I don't doubt that the jihadists would "evolve" in response to vigorous profiling by getting more atypical converts to engage in attacks.

Other tactics would have to be developed to deal with such threats (and I confess that I don't know what means would be most effective in this circumstance.) but it doesn't mean we should deprive ourselves of those methods which can be effective.

Posted by charger 2006-08-21 13:54|| 2006-08-21 13:54|| Front Page Top

#7 I'm sure there are still a few good Scots that would take this POS out in a heartbeat, and drop him off a cliff somewhere. This should happen to anyone that spouts this kind of garbage. Just simple self-defense. It's either that or start memorizing the Koran, which is only good for toilet paper, and not terribly good for that.

Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot 2006-08-21 15:36|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/] 2006-08-21 15:36|| Front Page Top

#8 You are attacking our people in Muslim countries, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, Mr. Ahmet said, referring to the British and American governments. So its legitimate to attack British soldiers and policemen, government officials, and even the White House.

And this is not advocating sedition in what way? Weld a radio tracking collar around this guy's neck.

Posted by Zenster 2006-08-21 19:24|| 2006-08-21 19:24|| Front Page Top

23:50 trailing wife
23:45 Zenster
23:16 DMFD
23:13 DMFD
23:02 Jules in the Hinterlands
22:47 FOTSGreg
22:47 Zenster
22:36 Zenster
22:32 Sleresing Hupolunter2709
22:21 Zenster
22:17 Zenster
22:10 djohn66
22:06 Zenster
21:58 Captain America
21:56 Saint Jimbo
21:55 muck4doo
21:54 eLarson
21:54 Captain America
21:52 Zenster
21:51 Saint Jimbo
21:44 eLarson
21:43 tu3031
21:43 Nimble Spemble
21:43 twobyfour