Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/28/2020 View Mon 07/27/2020 View Sun 07/26/2020 View Sat 07/25/2020 View Fri 07/24/2020 View Thu 07/23/2020 View Wed 07/22/2020
1
2020-07-28 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
A COVID Doctor is challenging CNN's @ChrisCuomo and Dr. Fauci to take a urine test to prove they aren't taking Hydroxychloroquine
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Woodrow 2020-07-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 I'd add all the conservative "experts" minimizing the threat of Covid 19 to the list of tested for HCQ traces - might be very interesting.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-07-28 01:31||   2020-07-28 01:31|| Front Page Top

#2 Between that and Dexamethasone, it seems we have a relatively effective general treatment that resolves a majority of cases quickly and favorably, and cheaply since all the medications involved are generic.

Put your timfoil hat on, but maybe thats why the pushback, in addition to the virulent Anti-Trump Disorder: Lots of pols are in the pay of major pharma companies, and they dont stand to make a dime off generic treatments. Its likely no THE reason, but certainly amongst the reasons for the dominant liberal media and leftist pols attacks on this treatment.
Posted by Marilyn Tojo7566 2020-07-28 02:34||   2020-07-28 02:34|| Front Page Top

#3 we now know that the data used in the Lancet study of HCQ was hosed
Posted by lord garth 2020-07-28 12:45||   2020-07-28 12:45|| Front Page Top

#4 however there are 'HCQ is not effective' studies that seem legit

maybe there are enough differences between the various regional strains of the virus to account for this difference in results
Posted by lord garth 2020-07-28 13:23||   2020-07-28 13:23|| Front Page Top

#5 #4 Garth, clinical trials is not science. They're more like opinion polls. You formulate the "right" questions, you get the "right" conclusions.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-07-28 14:08||   2020-07-28 14:08|| Front Page Top

#6  however there are 'HCQ is not effective' studies that seem legit

My takeaway is that the studies show HQC is not effective on its own against this thing lord garth, nor is it effective when the disease is severe or advanced. It is best in the early stages or as a prophylactic when given in combination with zinc and azithromycin or another antibiotic.
Posted by trailing wife 2020-07-28 14:40||   2020-07-28 14:40|| Front Page Top

#7 ^ This
Posted by Frank G 2020-07-28 15:12||   2020-07-28 15:12|| Front Page Top

#8 Really, all one have to do is blow their nose before the test and the test (if accurate) will show negative.

The nose is a good filtering system and a nose test isn't going to show whether a person has the virus or not.

Blood test is more accurate, but then again, just how are they testing for specific tests?. AFDAICT, they have no idea how to test for COVID-19 specifically and not some other virus.
Posted by Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2020-07-28 16:03||   2020-07-28 16:03|| Front Page Top

#9 ...testing for specific viruses?

Stupid brain fart...
Posted by Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2020-07-28 16:05||   2020-07-28 16:05|| Front Page Top

#10 Ummmmm
Posted by European Conservative 2020-07-28 21:17||   2020-07-28 21:17|| Front Page Top

23:57 Clem
23:42 Raj
23:41 Skidmark
23:29 Clem
23:14 Raj
23:11 Raj
22:56 JohnQC
22:48 Old Patriot
22:46 trailing wife
22:45 jpal
22:44 trailing wife
22:42 European Conservative
22:28 jpal
22:26 KBK
22:22 Skidmark
22:18 Skidmark
22:16 Skidmark
22:06 Raj
21:57 Raj
21:56 Raj
21:48 Raj
21:41 Skidmark
21:41 Zhang Fei
21:38 swksvolFF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com