Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 07/26/2018 View Wed 07/25/2018 View Tue 07/24/2018 View Mon 07/23/2018 View Sun 07/22/2018 View Sat 07/21/2018 View Fri 07/20/2018
1
2018-07-26 Home Front: Politix
Ben Shapiro: GOP Trailing (in Polls)
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mercutio 2018-07-26 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 Why didn't Ben link to the polls? That's the way it is normally done. Then folks can look at the details (how over sampled Democrats are for example).

The polls were way off prior to election 2016, I doubt they are suddenly worthy now.
Posted by ruprecht 2018-07-26 00:32||   2018-07-26 00:32|| Front Page Top

#2 Show me the internals: the ratios of Dem-Ind-Rep actually sampled and the wording of the questions. Until then *Pfui!*
Posted by magpie 2018-07-26 01:25||   2018-07-26 01:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Try this:

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2558
Posted by mercutio 2018-07-26 05:42||   2018-07-26 05:42|| Front Page Top

#4 Beltway pundit class has to believe in the validity of polls just as they have to believe they (the pundits) have any influence.
Posted by M. Murcek 2018-07-26 07:39||   2018-07-26 07:39|| Front Page Top

#5 According to the polls, Hillary won the 2016 election.

I think I'll go play the 2016 election night melt-down in the Hillary camp to give myself a boost today.
Posted by JohnQC 2018-07-26 09:35||   2018-07-26 09:35|| Front Page Top

#6 Summarizing Mercutio's link (#3), the Dems like more Dems and the Trunks like more Trunks.

Unexpectedly.
Posted by Bobby 2018-07-26 09:51||   2018-07-26 09:51|| Front Page Top

#7 I thought the cross-section in the "sample & methodology" section was interesting.. more independents than either Dem or GOP:
Republican 25%
Democrat 31
Independent 38
Other/DK/NA 7

suspect a lot of GOPers went independent.
Posted by mercutio 2018-07-26 11:02||   2018-07-26 11:02|| Front Page Top

#8 According to the polls, Hillary won the 2016 election.

On average, they got the popular vote to within 1% of the actual result. Trump's win was a fluke. He won by less than 1% in each of the 5 states that decided the election because Hillary thought she had the election in the bag and wanted to spike the ball by campaigning in red states she thought she had a chance of winning. If she had spent a little more time and money in the 1% margin states, it's likely she would have won.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2018-07-26 12:17||   2018-07-26 12:17|| Front Page Top

#9  If she had spent a little more time and money in the 1% margin states, it's likely she would have won.

I don't know about the other four states, but Trump was in Michigan the Monday before the election and did five rallies at various places in the state. As far as I can determine with respect to Michigan, it wasn't a fluke - Trump out-worked her, plain and simple.
Posted by Raj 2018-07-26 12:42||   2018-07-26 12:42|| Front Page Top

#10 Show me the internals: the ratios of Dem-Ind-Rep actually sampled and the wording of the questions.

Even that's not good enough. I always hang up the phone when people like that call. Either that or I have their calls blocked. And I suspect a lot of other folks do. There is only one poll that matters and that's the one in the voting booth on election day. In the meantime, if they were true to their philosophy and honest about it, they would argue their philosophy to the best of their ability and then let the voters decide instead of trying to figure out what voters want to hear and then saying that even though it's a lie. But then, I know it's too much to expect honesty.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2018-07-26 12:45||   2018-07-26 12:45|| Front Page Top

#11 As far as I can determine with respect to Michigan, it wasn't a fluke - Trump out-worked her, plain and simple.

She did work - but in Georgia and other states she ultimately lost. Local Democratic pols in swing states she lost were puzzled at her indifference (as in WTF is she up to) before the polls came in, and livid at her neglect after she conceded.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2018-07-26 13:17||   2018-07-26 13:17|| Front Page Top

#12 Local Democratic pols chose poorly
Posted by Bobby 2018-07-26 14:37||   2018-07-26 14:37|| Front Page Top

#13 I watched many Trump rallies. He always had huge turnouts. I also watched Hillary rallies for as much as I could stand. The turnout for her rally was nowhere close to the Trump turnout; her's were kind of pitiful w/regards to crowd size and messaging plus she had a lot of baggage.
Posted by JohnQC 2018-07-26 15:03||   2018-07-26 15:03|| Front Page Top

#14 Hillary worked California to add to her warchest. She didn't gain any extra votes for her efforts as Trump proved the conventional belief that the one with the most money will win was incorrect.

#mercutio a lot of independence might be socialists
Posted by rjschwarz 2018-07-26 16:34||   2018-07-26 16:34|| Front Page Top

#15 Trump's rallies drew people from far and wide, true, but within the watershed of each of those rallies fell how many college campuses? How many housing projects, federal buildings, city halls, senior centers, hospitals, clinics and other entitlement outlets? How many schoolteachers? Und die Unions... ach... die Unions! Die Unions und die SEIU und die Sauerkraut!
Posted by Zenobia Floger6220 2018-07-26 17:04||   2018-07-26 17:04|| Front Page Top

#16 Und die Unions... ach... die Unions! Die Unions und die SEIU und die Sauerkraut!

:-)
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2018-07-26 17:05||   2018-07-26 17:05|| Front Page Top

#17 Sorry, das Sauerkraut.
Posted by Tyranysaurus Phusort7653 2018-07-26 17:06||   2018-07-26 17:06|| Front Page Top

#18 She didn't gain any extra votes for her efforts as Trump proved the conventional belief that the one with the most money will win was incorrect.

It's correct as long as you don't make any bonehead errors. But Hillary ignored the advice of one of the greatest political talents in the Democratic party - Bill. That is the definition of bonehead error.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2018-07-26 17:28||   2018-07-26 17:28|| Front Page Top

#19  Sorry, das Sauerkraut.

Dude, you've misgendered a vegetable. That's sooo racist.
Posted by SteveS 2018-07-26 17:42||   2018-07-26 17:42|| Front Page Top

#20 Don't panic, don't get cocky.
Posted by charger 2018-07-26 18:31||   2018-07-26 18:31|| Front Page Top

23:59 Zenobia Floger6220
23:49 Angoluck Sheter3689
23:35 Cragum Spalet6493
23:16 gorb
23:15 gorb
23:10 gorb
23:06 gorb
23:05 gorb
23:03 gorb
23:01 gorb
22:53 gorb
22:49 gorb
22:24 Zhang Fei
22:06 KBK
21:55 Frank G
21:46 bbrewer126
21:41 bbrewer126
21:34 bbrewer126
21:29 ruprecht
21:25 ruprecht
21:24 Woodrow
21:23 ruprecht
19:14 Skidmark
19:06 Skidmark









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com