Article

2006-07-22 Israel-Palestine-Jordan

Gaza groups agree to stop firing at Israel

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tu3031 2006-07-22 13:30|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 just quoting the movie "Silverado" ...."where's the boy?"

but you can if ya wants to quote the same movie about the Hezzie idiot..... "where's the dog?"

Posted by mag44_vaquero 2006-07-22 13:44|| 2006-07-22 13:44|| Front Page Top

#2 Ran out weapons, did they? Or is it just a temporary case of brute-force syndrome.

Posted by Poison Reverse 2006-07-22 13:45|| 2006-07-22 13:45|| Front Page Top

#3 Fox Interviewed the groups. First they had heard of agreeing to anything.

Posted by 3dc 2006-07-22 13:49|| 2006-07-22 13:49|| Front Page Top

#4 No PRC or Gaza al-queda commitments, eh?

It will NOT stop until the islamofascists are hunting down and exterminated.

Posted by Brett 2006-07-22 13:52|| 2006-07-22 13:52|| Front Page Top

#5 I heard that same Fox report. I find the notion of any central authority agreeing to anything on behalf of the various terrorist groups in Gaza to be suspect. These groups have long histories of engaging in their own private wars with Israel, notwithstanding the position of the central authority.

If one is to believe any central netogiating authority could cause it to end, one would also have to believe the central authority could have prevented it from starting in the first place.

Posted by crosspatch">crosspatch 2006-07-22 13:55|| http://crufty.blogspot.com]">[http://crufty.blogspot.com] 2006-07-22 13:55|| Front Page Top

#6 Nothing but a PR campaign. "See, we offered cease-fire and Israelis still attack our baby ducks!"

Posted by twobyfour 2006-07-22 14:04|| 2006-07-22 14:04|| Front Page Top

Posted by Anonymoose 2006-07-22 14:06|| 2006-07-22 14:06|| Front Page Top

#8 Ah, must be time to retreat, regroup, resupply, reequip, and rearm. Can't do that very well without a "cease fire", can we? Also makes for good press because the world community is so naive.

Posted by gorb 2006-07-22 14:45|| 2006-07-22 14:45|| Front Page Top

#9 Hudnas are so last millenium.

Posted by ed 2006-07-22 14:50|| 2006-07-22 14:50|| Front Page Top

#10 "naive"

gorb - I think you misspelled "complicit".

Posted by Uneagum Jaimp5940 2006-07-22 14:51|| 2006-07-22 14:51|| Front Page Top

#11 Uneagum: My mistake. :-)

Posted by gorb 2006-07-22 14:56|| 2006-07-22 14:56|| Front Page Top

#12 It looks to me as if the Iranian troops that slid in last week need some time to build forces. Next month should be fun.

Posted by 49 Pan 2006-07-22 15:10|| 2006-07-22 15:10|| Front Page Top

#13 Latest...what agreement to stop ? Gazers declare ignorance....well that settles that.

Posted by Inspector Clueso 2006-07-22 16:51|| 2006-07-22 16:51|| Front Page Top

#14 the only reason a group asks or agrees to a cease fire is to re-arm it's forces.

So, when you get them on the ropes, keep punching.

Posted by Armylife 2006-07-22 17:43|| 2006-07-22 17:43|| Front Page Top

#15 When the other side asks for a cease-fire, that means that your side is doing something right, so keep it up.

Posted by Alaska Paul">Alaska Paul 2006-07-22 22:46|| 2006-07-22 22:46|| Front Page Top

23:57 trailing wife
23:52 RWV
23:51 trailing wife
23:50 john
23:46 trailing wife
23:42 crosspatch
23:42 Poison Reverse
23:41 trailing wife
23:37 gorb
23:37 Sherry
23:32 Unoling Hupinens1262
23:28 trailing wife
23:28 Zhang Fei
23:25 trailing wife
23:24 twobyfour
23:22 Classical_Liberal
23:13 Anonymoose
23:08 Wholuling Shiter7169
23:07 cruiser
23:05 Idiom Police
22:56 Zhang Fei
22:55 john
22:54 john
22:50 Alaska Paul