Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 07/21/2006 View Thu 07/20/2006 View Wed 07/19/2006 View Tue 07/18/2006 View Mon 07/17/2006 View Sun 07/16/2006 View Sat 07/15/2006
1
2006-07-21 Science & Technology
Yucca Mountain hangs in nuclear limbo
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by BA 2006-07-21 10:19|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Sometimes I think that any solution to the nuclear "waste" issue must be opposed by the environmental nutjobs. Because any solution makes nuclear seem a viable option. But even if all of the nuclear plants in the country were shut down today we still have the waste issue to deal with. It is not going to go away.
Posted by Cheaderhead 2006-07-21 15:22||   2006-07-21 15:22|| Front Page Top

#2 This site is as good as it gets. We need it to have nuclear power in this country. We need nuclear power to reduce our geostrategic vulnerablity in the middle east and (at least according to some scientists though it is far from settled) to reduce carbon emissions.

Interestingly, the activists who oppose Yucca Mountain are often the same folks who want us out of the middle east and to sign the Kyoto treaty. Their positions are self-contradictory unless we return to the stone age.

For this reason I cannot take the Democrats (clearly the political party holding these positions) seriously on public policy.
Posted by JAB 2006-07-21 16:40||   2006-07-21 16:40|| Front Page Top

#3 The father of one my best friends, a true JFK-style liberal, worked at one of the national nuclear labs. He's fairly left-progressive and dedicated green until you mention nuclear power. Then he goes ballistic -- what we needed, according to him, were fast breeder reactors, recycle all the fuel rods, incinerate the nuclear waste in the breeders, and have a closed loop for plutonium fuel.

Why? Because it's the least polluting of all our options, according to him.

I'd love to get him into the same room as the usual enviro-nnuts.
Posted by Steve White">Steve White  2006-07-21 19:07||   2006-07-21 19:07|| Front Page Top

#4 Hallelujah Steve. Not only is the waste less radioactive, but the long lived radioactinides are burned in the breeder reactors.
Posted by ed 2006-07-21 19:12||   2006-07-21 19:12|| Front Page Top

23:53 tu3031
23:50 Secret Master
23:46 3dc
23:44 trailing wife
23:41 Barbara Skolaut
23:32 DMFD
23:28 Glenmore
23:27 Sherry
23:19 Shinegum Thraiger5571
23:15 Iblis
23:12 Slavising Sholuting4450
23:07 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:07 Slavising Sholuting4450
23:04 wxjames
23:04 Slavising Sholuting4450
22:59 Slavising Sholuting4450
22:57 Slavising Sholuting4450
22:55 wxjames
22:45 JosephMendiola
22:43 tu3031
22:42 Shinegum Thraiger5571
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:36 Aztaroth
22:31 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com