Article

2021-07-17 -Great Cultural Revolution

US judge blocks new applications to DACA program for 'dreamer' immigrants

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Frank G 2021-07-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [8 views ] Top

#1 Ha Ha Ha Ha!

Posted by Blackbeard Barnsmell6454 2021-07-17 01:36|| 2021-07-17 01:36|| Front Page Top

Posted by Lionel Fillmore9492 2021-07-17 01:48|| 2021-07-17 01:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Breaking — In Friday night ruling, Federal Judge declares DACA program is illegal and un-Constitutional !!!

Posted by Don Vito Crusock5478 2021-07-17 06:43|| 2021-07-17 06:43|| Front Page Top

#4 Stealing an election is unconstitutional but has been ratified by SCOTUS. It's all about power, baby.

Posted by Procopius2k 2021-07-17 07:17|| 2021-07-17 07:17|| Front Page Top

#5 Federal judge orders Biden to BLOCK new DACA applications after ruling Obama illegally created program shielding 650,000 migrant children from deportation

Posted by Skidmark 2021-07-17 07:47|| 2021-07-17 07:47|| Front Page Top

#6 Migrant arrests at the southern border rise for the SIXTH month in a row under Biden: Guards caught 188,000 crossing in June - and 2.3 MILLION are projected to arrive by the end of 2021

Posted by Skidmark 2021-07-17 08:01|| 2021-07-17 08:01|| Front Page Top

#7 From The Volokh Conspiracy, some thoughts:

The Path Forward For The Texas DACA Case
A stay from the Fifth Circuit is unlikely. Do Justices Kavanaugh and/or Barrett have the "fortitude" to let the injunction go into effect?

Today, Judge Hanen ruled that DACA was both procedurally and substantively invalid. (Co-blogger Jon Adler wrote about it here). This case has been pending forever. Texas filed the original complaint in May 2018. The case sat around while the DACA rescission litigation wound through the federal courts. Last June, the Chief set aside the rescission memorandum in Regents. Now, a year later, the district court set aside the original policy, which has been in effect since 2012. Yes, the policy is more than 9 years old. It has stretched the entirety of my academic career.

At this point, the Defendant-Intervenors, as well as the Biden Administration, will seek a stay from the Fifth Circuit. That remedy is very unlikely, as Hanen's decision follows very closely from the Fifth Circuit's DAPA decision. Later, the parties will seek an emergency stay from the Supreme Court.

How do the votes shake out? I suspect the Chief Justice will grant a stay for all three remedies. There is only one jurist in the country who can radically alter federal law, and his name is John G. Roberts. And we know the Chief does not like district court injunctions. Alas, Roberts plus the Kagan three makes four–not enough for a stay. And if all four dissent from the denial of a stay, it will be obvious to the world that Justices Kavanaugh and/or Barrett refused to help the Dreamers.

Will Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett have, in the words of Justice Gorsuch, the "fortitude" to deny the stay? Justice Kavanaugh recently split the difference in the eviction case: he found the moratorium illegal but declined to put that ruling into effect. My prediction? He declines to stay the first ground of relief, vote to stay at the second ground for relief, and urges the Court to grant cert before judgment for the third ground for relief. Plus he writes a hand-wringing concurrence about how DACA is illegal but the Dreamers are such wonderful people. He can copy-and-paste from his Regents decision: "They live, go to school, and work here with uncertainty about their futures."

Posted by trailing wife 2021-07-17 08:27|| 2021-07-17 08:27|| Front Page Top

#8 they can go back to their country of origin and dream there.

unless they are actually being deported though, it is just more kicking the can down the road.

Posted by Retard Strength 2021-07-17 09:59|| 2021-07-17 09:59|| Front Page Top

#9 I'm waiting for SCOTUS to throw out the constitution. Yeah it was unconstitutional but we write magic papers and its all good in the end. So, tell me why any of us have to follow any law other than what the 'enforcer' uses more power to impose.

Posted by Procopius2k 2021-07-17 13:38|| 2021-07-17 13:38|| Front Page Top

23:49 CrazyFool
23:36 Thereling the Limber5293
22:35 Ebbomoger Speaking for Boskone4589
22:17 Frank G
21:00 CrazyFool
20:57 Lonzo Trotsky7079
20:51 Mike Kozlowski
20:27 Frank G
20:25 CrazyFool
20:00 Vinegar Spolusing6485
19:55 Slappy
19:13 Grunter
18:57 Grunter
18:57 ed in texas
18:54 Mercutio
18:52 Mercutio
18:51 Mercutio
18:48 ed in texas
18:41 ed in texas
18:36 ed in texas
18:22 swksvolFF
17:56 Glenmore
17:28 magpie
17:15 Bobby