Article

2009-07-04 International-UN-NGOs

Incoming IAEA chief: No evidence Iran seeking nuclear weapons

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2009-07-04 03:49|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 Depends on what he means by 'hard evidence'. I don't have any 'hard evidence' the Norks have a bomb - it's all just hearsay.

Come to think of it - I personally don't have any 'hard evidence' the Rooskies have a bomb.

Posted by Bobby 2009-07-04 06:28|| 2009-07-04 06:28|| Front Page Top

#2 Bobby,
We have no hard evidence the US has any bombs either. We had some but we used some and took others apart - who really knows how many are left.

Posted by Glenmore 2009-07-04 08:52|| 2009-07-04 08:52|| Front Page Top

#3 Yukiya Amano got his Saki goggles on?

Posted by Besoeker 2009-07-04 09:44|| 2009-07-04 09:44|| Front Page Top

#4 These guys remind me of something from my childhood... AH! That's IT!

Posted by OldSpook 2009-07-04 10:43|| 2009-07-04 10:43|| Front Page Top

#5 Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Posted by Parabellum 2009-07-04 10:47|| http://sidemeat.wordpress.com/]">[http://sidemeat.wordpress.com/] 2009-07-04 10:47|| Front Page Top

#6 Oh fer Chrissakes. I though if we got a non-muzzie in the position there might be something accomplished. What is it with these guys?

Posted by Hellfish 2009-07-04 11:34|| 2009-07-04 11:34|| Front Page Top

#7 Nah, Glenmore (#2), I've seen pictures of US tests.

Waitaminute...They could be photoshopped...like the moon landings.

[/moonbat]

Posted by Bobby 2009-07-04 12:11|| 2009-07-04 12:11|| Front Page Top

#8 Bobby,
On July 16, 1945 we had 1-3 nukes. On July 17 we had one less. On August 9 I don't think we had any. We kept making them and we kept testing them - prove we still have any. Everybody assumes we do, but 'everybody' thought Saddam had WMD too.

Posted by Glenmore 2009-07-04 13:08|| 2009-07-04 13:08|| Front Page Top

#9 Nuclear watchdog, ya say? More like a watch-hamster.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2009-07-04 13:08|| 2009-07-04 13:08|| Front Page Top

#10 The IAEA, still no evidence that it is actually relevant or worth anything.

Posted by DarthVader 2009-07-04 13:30|| 2009-07-04 13:30|| Front Page Top

#11 I'm not really sure why we tolerate such nonsense from the UN. The Human Rights Group have made a mockery of Human Rights. The IAEA is an even bigger joke. The US should hold nations accountable for their votes and start pulling back aid and attention.

The US should push for Japan to become not only a permanent member of the security council but the new home of the UN. We should push for enlargement all around and dillute the power and force the French/Russians and Chinese to fight against it to preserve their little bits of power, thus putting us on the side of the little nations. If it enlarges the UN is weaker, if not, we look better to half of the world. Win/win.

If all of that doesn't work we walk away.

Posted by rjschwarz 2009-07-04 15:18|| 2009-07-04 15:18|| Front Page Top

#12 The IAEA governors have picked the correct man to lead their esteemed organization.

He hasn't even assumed office and he already has the denial thing down pat.

That Nobel Peace Prize is a sure thing.

Posted by john frum 2009-07-04 15:18|| 2009-07-04 15:18|| Front Page Top

#13 Did ElBaradei get himself some plastic surgery or something?

Posted by gorb 2009-07-04 17:37|| 2009-07-04 17:37|| Front Page Top

23:49 trailing wife
23:40 trailing wife
23:36 trailing wife
23:21 CrazyFool
22:57 KBK
22:49 Broadhead6
22:45 anymouse
22:39 badanov
22:32 Thrineque Lumplump8647
22:29 Thrineque Lumplump8647
22:26 Thrineque Lumplump8647
22:24 KBK
22:24 Thrineque Lumplump8647
22:21 KBK
22:19 Thrineque Lumplump8647
22:16 Thrineque Lumplump8647
21:35 Nimble Spemble
21:19 Pappy
21:16 Pappy
21:02 Don Vito Crolutle2068
20:42 Skunky Glins 5***
20:10 49 Pan
19:20 Besoeker
19:12 DMFD