Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 07/03/2021 View Fri 07/02/2021 View Thu 07/01/2021 View Wed 06/30/2021 View Tue 06/29/2021 View Mon 06/28/2021 View Sun 06/27/2021
1
2021-07-03 Science & Technology
Journal Retracts Terrible Study That Claimed Widespread Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2021-07-03 15:03|| || Front Page|| [8 views ]  Top

#1 Even with this decision, some scientists have questioned how the paper got through the peer-review process in the first place.

Because they're all buddy-buddy with each other, that's why. Scratch my back, then I'll scratch yours.
Posted by Raj 2021-07-03 15:59||   2021-07-03 15:59|| Front Page Top

#2 In addition... per review does *not* mean the results or conclusions were replicated. Only that some guys read the paper, looked over the math and did not see any glaring errors.

Additionally in addition... humans are remarkably adept at fooling themselves. If you want something to be true, you can come up with endless logical reasons why. Evidence to the contrary? Inconvenient facts, misinformation and conspiracy. So just shut up. You don't want to lose your job, do you?
Posted by SteveS 2021-07-03 16:14||   2021-07-03 16:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Whe(r)e's our (r)resident COVID ghoul?
Posted by Jash Squank7662 2021-07-03 21:19||   2021-07-03 21:19|| Front Page Top

#4 Or pulled under pressure. Take your pick.
Posted by Speng Snaviting6874 2021-07-03 21:22||   2021-07-03 21:22|| Front Page Top

#5 Fauci is enjoying his new Pfizer funded pool where it’s now safe to pee if you wear two bathing suits.
Posted by Jack Salami 2021-07-03 22:08||   2021-07-03 22:08|| Front Page Top

#6 While certain traditional journals, like The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, have become notorious in recent years for the laxity of their reviewers, at least for certain fashionable topics, open access journals can be orders of magnitude worse.
Posted by trailing wife 2021-07-03 22:16||   2021-07-03 22:16|| Front Page Top

23:58 Sheba B. Bridges6348
23:52 Sheba B. Bridges6348
23:28 Silentbrick
23:19 Zebulon Crineng3408
22:16 trailing wife
22:08 Jack Salami
22:08 SteveS
21:59 SteveS
21:34 Woozle Theamble4130
21:22 Speng Snaviting6874
21:22 Greng Wittlesbach7533
21:19 Jash Squank7662
21:18 Jiggs Flort7068
20:43 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
19:52 Procopius2k
19:45 Vernal Hatrick
19:44 Sheba B. Hayes6348
19:30 SteveS
19:11 trailing wife
19:05 M. Murcek
18:59 Menhadden Ghibelline2247
17:35 ed in texas
17:10 Mike Kozlowski
16:30 M. Murcek









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com