Article

2007-07-28 Science & Technology

Boeing Contracted For Truck Mounted Laser Cannon

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2007-07-28 11:12|| || Front Page|| [11133 views ] Top

#1 I'm hoping our military begins to use this same tool against enemy combatants. I look forward to the day when America's foes die in dreadful agony with such regularity that they crap their pants just thinking about coming up against our troops.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-07-28 12:26|| 2007-07-28 12:26|| Front Page Top

#2 Any way we can get the lens or ruby or whatever to be made out of / with pork products?

We can then zap the enemy and send them straight to hell at the same time.

Posted by CrazyFool 2007-07-28 12:50|| 2007-07-28 12:50|| Front Page Top

#3 Unfortunately, Zenster, our troops aren't allowed to use half the weapons we've already got. When's the last time napalm was used?

Posted by Gary and the Samoyeds">Gary and the Samoyeds 2007-07-28 12:59|| http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html] 2007-07-28 12:59|| Front Page Top

#4 Gary and the Samoyeds: Napalm is a very specialized tool, and is actually far more useful in the defense (FFE) than offense, the exception being lush mountainous area targets. As a rule, HE is the preferred means, as it gives maximum military casualties otherwise.

Posted by Anonymoose 2007-07-28 13:07|| 2007-07-28 13:07|| Front Page Top

#5 truck-mounted laser cannons for the US Army.

Say what you will, I can't help but smile. So may military SF stories from the 60's featured "laser Cannons" of one sort or another. We really are in the 21st century. Now, about those jet packs...

Posted by N Guard 2007-07-28 13:51|| 2007-07-28 13:51|| Front Page Top

#6 THELs aren't all that optimal as antipersonnel weapons.

A big part of laser weapon system effectiveness is keeping the beam on the target as it moves. Computationally intensive, but doable for incoming rockets, artillery and mortars due to their usually-predictable trajectories.

Also, the destruction of incoming RAM is accomplished by burning through the shell and exploding the onboard ordinance. Not energy effective to try to do this regularly with human bodies.

Posted by lotp 2007-07-28 14:02|| 2007-07-28 14:02|| Front Page Top

#7 It really doesn't matter to me how we go about killing our foes. I just want them to be terrified at the prospect of getting anywhere our troops or shores.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-07-28 15:03|| 2007-07-28 15:03|| Front Page Top

#8 well the IEDs wouldn't do much harm if we had our flying cars! Damn it. It's the 21st century, and we were promised flying cars!

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2007-07-28 16:34|| 2007-07-28 16:34|| Front Page Top

#9 You don't need to incinerate enemy troops. You just need to blind them and let the enemy decide what to do with them.

Posted by gorb 2007-07-28 17:55|| 2007-07-28 17:55|| Front Page Top

#10 Understood. Just sayin' this isn't the ideal weapon for that gorb.

Posted by lotp 2007-07-28 19:16|| 2007-07-28 19:16|| Front Page Top

#11 It sounds like a great permanent defensive weapon. A base could be covered by 3, 4, or 5 of these lasers, and no penetration, from ground or air would go unpunished. Aircraft attack would become passe, as would indirect fire. Mounted on a truck allows for quick installation and relocation from blind to blind or base to base.
Yes, aircraft attack has become passe.

Posted by wxjames 2007-07-28 19:38|| 2007-07-28 19:38|| Front Page Top

#12 Wish it were so but things aren't quite that simple unfortunately.

One of the problems with using THELs for fixed base defense is the problem inherent in any significant laser application. Unlike kinetic ordinance, directed energy can travel a very long way if it misses its target. Makes airspace management more than a little challenging to avoid blue on blue disasters.

To complicate things even more, the effective energy exchange from the laser beam to whatever it hits is determined not only by distance but also by factors like elevation above sea level and relative humidity, which are factored into the time-required-on-target calculations for different target types.

So while there is promise in the use of lasers for some applications in some places, it's not going to change things quite as much or as quickly as we'd all wish.

Posted by lotp 2007-07-28 21:02|| 2007-07-28 21:02|| Front Page Top

#13 To be honest I don't know why you don't ring the base with souped up microwave ovens.

Any attackers are
Sterilised,
Blinded
Cooked.

Depending on distance. Hopefully you already do this but don't tell anyone. It would be dead cheap to do.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2007-07-28 23:38|| 2007-07-28 23:38|| Front Page Top

23:53 Seafarious
23:38 Bright Pebbles
23:33 Bright Pebbles
23:30 Super Hose
23:28 Sigmund Freud
23:26 Bright Pebbles
23:24 Bright Pebbles
23:17 Sigmund Freud
23:14 OldSpook
23:11 regular joe
23:03 gromgoru
23:02 Speasing Sinatra3559
22:47 anymouse
22:44 Halliburton - Colonial Affairs Division
22:43 OldSpook
22:39 OldSpook
22:37 Halliburton - Colonial Affairs Division
22:30 gromgoru
22:20 Mike
22:12 DarthVader
22:11 DarthVader
22:05 WTF
22:01 OldSpook
21:57 OldSpook