Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 06/21/2009 View Sat 06/20/2009 View Fri 06/19/2009 View Thu 06/18/2009 View Wed 06/17/2009 View Tue 06/16/2009 View Mon 06/15/2009
1
2009-06-21 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Tit for tat: daughter of former Iranian president arrested
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by trailing wife 2009-06-21 11:29|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Iran 

#1 um. what's a "tat"?
Posted by Angealing Fillmore8510 2009-06-21 12:17||   2009-06-21 12:17|| Front Page Top

#2 Er, tattoo? So that'd be tat on tit, like at a strip joint...
Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek  2009-06-21 13:30||   2009-06-21 13:30|| Front Page Top

#3 From the Random House Website
Both tit and tat are archaic words meaning 'a light blow'. The entire expression thus means 'a blow for a blow', like 'an eye for an eye'. Both words were used as verbs, too: a popular song of the late sixteenth century had a refrain, "Come tit me, come tat me,/Come throw a kiss at me."

These words are probably of imitative origin, with a vowel variation found in other words expressing striking such as tip and tap or pit-a-pat. The tit is not related to other tit words, such as the ones (each of independent origin) meaning 'a small bird' (e.g. "titmouse"), 'a breast', or the first element of "tit-bit" (in America usually euphemized to "tid-bit," but not related to the 'breast' word).

The phrase tit for tat is first found in the sixteenth century. It is probably a variant of tip for tap, of similar origin but found a century earlier. The tip in this earlier phrase is the same word as in the baseball expression "a foul tip."
Posted by cingold 2009-06-21 15:09||   2009-06-21 15:09|| Front Page Top

#4 
"If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in possession, the strategy of colonialism would face a stalemate because application of an atomic bomb would not leave any thing in Israel but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world"
Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani December 2001


I would certainly welcome a successful overthrow of the Islamic Republic by the Iranian people.

The possibility remains however that all of this is just a power grab by one faction of the politburo Mullahs at the expense of another faction.

Mousavi et al don't deny the Holocaust of the 1930s and 40s, they just want to complete it.

Let's hope for the best but let's also be cautious and be prepared for the worst!
Posted by Knuckles Ulinesing2882 2009-06-21 18:30||   2009-06-21 18:30|| Front Page Top

23:57 trailing wife
23:54 Broadhead6
23:47 Broadhead6
23:39 Anguper Hupomosing9418
23:29 Dan
23:23 Thomas Jefferson
23:19 Heriberto Glomorong1155
23:16 Titus Thraque8082
22:33 whatadeal
22:23 Rambler in Virginia
22:13 Mark Espinola
22:11 trailing wife
22:09 trailing wife
22:07 crosspatch
22:02 eLarson
21:58 JosephMendiola
21:58 JosephMendiola
21:55 JosephMendiola
21:43 OldSpook
21:43 OldSpook
21:41 746
21:40 OldSpook
21:32 Barbara Skolaut
21:11 Redneck Jim









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com