Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 06/17/2006 View Fri 06/16/2006 View Thu 06/15/2006 View Wed 06/14/2006 View Tue 06/13/2006 View Mon 06/12/2006 View Sun 06/11/2006
1
2006-06-17 Home Front: WoT
Shackles removed from confined Marines, sailor
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Frank G 2006-06-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 VP Cheney is right, there is and should be a presumption of innocence.
Posted by Captain America 2006-06-17 00:18||   2006-06-17 00:18|| Front Page Top

#2 Thing is, I believe I read someplace a while back that they have confessions in this case. I thought I also read that the corpsman was going to be released soon so I am surprised he is still there.
Posted by crosspatch">crosspatch  2006-06-17 00:32|| http://crufty.blogspot.com]">[http://crufty.blogspot.com]  2006-06-17 00:32|| Front Page Top

#3 The men would not be in shackles unless military investigators already possesses some type of sworn physical or written evidence against them, i.e. non-perjurious [for now] direct evidence has been levied against them. It is up to the men's counsel(s) to submit either evidence of fraud-on-the-court, absolute non-guilt of any crime or unprofessional/immoral/unlawful/unethical
action, or in the alternate not as guilty as others. THE LEAD DEFENSE COUNSEL(S) MUST PROVE PERJURY OR MISTAKE. Remember also, one of the allegations or charges against them is alleged wilful falsifying of combat or after-action reports to disguise engaging in atrocity(s) against ordinary civilians. Any investigation or court(s)-martial will follow or should follow the USCMJ, MilRegs, International Agreements in regards to US mil forces, and Fed-DOD caselaws and protocols, not the MSM.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-06-17 00:37||   2006-06-17 00:37|| Front Page Top

#4 JAG-types... is Joe dialed in here?
Posted by 6 2006-06-17 08:03||   2006-06-17 08:03|| Front Page Top

#5 Speculations aplenty. Only time will tell.
Posted by Captain America 2006-06-17 10:01||   2006-06-17 10:01|| Front Page Top

#6 The eight men, confined at the brig since May 24, were being held with “maximum” restraints based on their battalion commander’s decision

Upon reflection, I've decided not to comment.
Posted by gromgoru 2006-06-17 10:49||   2006-06-17 10:49|| Front Page Top

23:43 J Hood
23:34 Skidmark
23:33 grb
23:31 grb
23:29 grb
23:23 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:13 J Hood
23:13 49 Pan
23:12 J Hood
23:06 trailing wife
23:03 Jeanter Pharong3307
23:01 trailing wife
23:00 JosephMendiola
22:59 grb
22:57 RWV
22:53 JosephMendiola
22:52 RWV
22:49 grb
22:45 Desert Blondie
22:44 JosephMendiola
22:43 Desert Blondie
22:40 Anonymoose
22:36 Shieldwolf
22:33 Shieldwolf









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com