Article

2009-06-12 Home Front: Culture Wars

New Miss California has same views on gay marriage as old Miss California

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2009-06-12 02:59|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 The next Miss California

Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2009-06-12 03:16|| 2009-06-12 03:16|| Front Page Top

#2 ..And I think that the right thing to do is let the voters decide."

Heresy! That should get her booted faster than if she had just keep the one man, one women point.

Posted by Procopius2k 2009-06-12 08:06|| 2009-06-12 08:06|| Front Page Top

#3 The voters have decided, and the answer is they align themselves with "one man, one woman" correct?

Posted by Lagom 2009-06-12 09:44|| 2009-06-12 09:44|| Front Page Top

#4 In a 'democracy of special interests', it's not what the voters want that really counts. It's what the special interests want that has standing. Voters are only used in a ritualistic process to validate the oligarchs.

Posted by Procopious2k 2009-06-12 11:26|| 2009-06-12 11:26|| Front Page Top

#5 Discression being the better part of valor 'Farrell responded in the affirmative with a simple, "Uh huh."'. I can't really blame her. The Left can be pretty nasty when you do not agree with them totally; they may choose not to notice in that they won this round.

Farrell quickly added: "I don't think that I have the right or anybody has a right to tell somebody who they can or can't love." Actually, I do not know anybody is saying that. What they are saying is that marriage is between a man and a woman. Period.

You can love anyone you want and no one really cares.

Civil rights have nothing to do with marriage. Civil rights is the province of all American Citizens.

Regarding the state of marriage it is the province of the voters or the legislature not the courts. I don't know, some day "gay" marriage may be the law of the land. If so it will be the voters or the legislature who changes the exiting definition, not the courts.

Posted by Kelly 2009-06-12 12:57|| 2009-06-12 12:57|| Front Page Top

#6 Quick unscientific poll.

Dare they can her like the first Miss Calif? After all she's saying the same things.

Yes, or No.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2009-06-12 15:21|| 2009-06-12 15:21|| Front Page Top

#7 Actually I had the change to watch her (Farrell) on Cavuto this evening and it seemed to me that she went out of her way NOT to answer the question and to mouth politically correct platitudes in order to stay out of the fire.

Sort of like if asked about health care she would answer that she thought everyone should be healthy.

Posted by Kelly 2009-06-12 21:57|| 2009-06-12 21:57|| Front Page Top

#8 You can love anyone you want and no one really cares.

As long as you don't do it in the road and scare the horses.

Posted by SteveS 2009-06-12 22:15|| 2009-06-12 22:15|| Front Page Top

23:53 European Conservative
23:45 SteveS
23:41 trailing wife
23:40 Hellfish
23:37 Hellfish
23:35 OldSpook
23:20 OldSpook
23:20 JosephMendiola
23:11 JosephMendiola
23:10 JosephMendiola
23:04 DarthVader
23:00 trailing wife
22:55 Procopius2k
22:49 JosephMendiola
22:44 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:31 Pappy
22:30 Barbara Skolaut
22:28 Pappy
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:23 Pappy
22:15 SteveS
22:06 Pappy
21:57 Kelly