Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/27/2010 View Wed 05/26/2010 View Tue 05/25/2010 View Mon 05/24/2010 View Sun 05/23/2010 View Sat 05/22/2010 View Fri 05/21/2010
1
2010-05-27 Home Front: Culture Wars
Congress Set To Vote On DADT
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2010-05-27 08:04|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Adm. Mike Mullen, the nation's top uniformed officer and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told graduating Air Force Academy cadets on Wednesday that they need to support a changing military.

HEY MIKE......BLOW IT OUT YUR ASS!!!
Posted by armyguy 2010-05-27 08:54||   2010-05-27 08:54|| Front Page Top

#2 If you have 8 to 12 years in, its time to get out. The pols are going to make unit life a frat house for the juniors and military good order and discipline is going to go out the door with a new sexual revolution in the barracks. If you can't prosecute gays for fraternization, sexual harassment or adultery, you won't be able to do it to the straights, as you've done forever, either. Nearly nothing will destroy unit integrity than that kind of behavior running through an organization.
Posted by Procopius2k 2010-05-27 09:19||   2010-05-27 09:19|| Front Page Top

#3 1.) No one has a right to serve in the military.
2.) If I have to share a room with a homosexual, I can't just quit my job like I can in the civilian world. No other job in the world forces you to live with a homosexual.
3.) If homosexuals want to serve, they already can.


What's next, transgenders? Would they be allowed in the infantry?
Posted by Grunt_0369 2010-05-27 10:09||   2010-05-27 10:09|| Front Page Top

#4 it will be interesting to see if Field of Fire Webb will vote against.
Posted by bman 2010-05-27 10:51||   2010-05-27 10:51|| Front Page Top

#5 
Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the sinktrap. Further violations may result in banning.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2010-05-27 13:46||   2010-05-27 13:46|| Front Page Top

#6 It would state that *only* when a homosexual was wearing a military uniform, *and* had self-identified as a homosexual, could they be 'culled', and only in such a manner as to not endanger the lives of other military personnel or civilians.

One day we'll come for the Nazi. But I was a Nazi so I didn't cry.


The 'license' would go on to state that it does not, in any way, confer legality or immunity from prosecution for homicide, if the hunter is arrested; however, it *does* authorize and encourage him to protect his command by asserting that the reason and motive for the killing is for any other reason *but* the sexual proclivities of the now deceased homosexual.
Posted by Shipman 2010-05-27 19:59||   2010-05-27 19:59|| Front Page Top

#7 I'll be the witness to your witless.

I don't fucking forget.
Posted by Shipman 2010-05-27 20:00||   2010-05-27 20:00|| Front Page Top

#8 Sorry. Didn't mean to be mean. I forgot that AnonMoose was a regular.


Bad bad, no troll obvious stone cold racist, mysognist or just fuckng plain cooks.

Thank god for JOE2012
Posted by Shipman 2010-05-27 20:04||   2010-05-27 20:04|| Front Page Top

#9 Moose, I gotta say I am disgusted by your gay hunting "license". Ship and I don't always agree, but on this you were way over the f*cking line. I understand DADT and the instances noted of unit comeradery, and don't have a problem with it. I don't need to know who/what my co-worker bonks. TMI. But to support the hunting down of gays is just aplorable. Count me off your fan list
Posted by Frank G 2010-05-27 20:50||   2010-05-27 20:50|| Front Page Top

#10 "de"plorable....dammit
Posted by Frank G 2010-05-27 20:51||   2010-05-27 20:51|| Front Page Top

#11 I think who or what you love is none of my damn buisiness, I wish others thought the same.

It'd eliminate much wasted hate.

Those who think i advocate animal sex, NO, but everyone has lost a loved pet or two, and the anguish was no less that the loved one was nonhuman.
I had arsonists burn my home along with my cats, if I find them I'm likely to Burn them the same way, it hurt finding small roasted bodies burned hairless, I wil NOT forget.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2010-05-27 21:02||   2010-05-27 21:02|| Front Page Top

#12 I had arsonists burn my home along with my cats, if I find them I'm likely to Burn them the same way

If that happened to me and I caught these SOBs in the act, they would not do it again. I put these arsonist in the category of child abusers.

Who's pushing abandoning DADT? What's the purpose of changing the existing policy? How would changing the existing policy affect military morale and readiness? Does anyone who currently serves in the military serve with anyone who is gay? How does the gay person do their job? How does this affect others and the way they do their jobs. Are gays capable of capable of killing the enemy if need be? Are there support jobs they can do effectively?
Posted by JohnQC 2010-05-27 21:29||   2010-05-27 21:29|| Front Page Top

23:11 SteveS
23:00 CrazyFool
22:54 AlmostAnonymous5839
22:47 Frank G
22:45 Frank G
22:37 trailing wife
22:29 trailing wife
22:28 tu3031
22:17 Pappy
22:11 Pappy
22:09 JohnQC
22:08 tu3031
22:07 JohnQC
22:05 tu3031
22:02 Pappy
22:02 phil_b
21:57 3dc
21:53 JohnQC
21:38 Redneck Jim
21:35 Redneck Jim
21:29 JohnQC
21:28 OldSpook
21:28 Redneck Jim
21:25 CrazyFool









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com