Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 05/23/2004 View Sat 05/22/2004 View Fri 05/21/2004 View Thu 05/20/2004 View Wed 05/19/2004 View Tue 05/18/2004 View Mon 05/17/2004
1
2004-05-23 Iraq-Jordan
U.S. kills 16 Bad Boyz in Kufa
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Zenster 2004-05-23 11:34:57 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 As if Tehran would confirm Chalabi was their spy? Surprise meter....
Posted by Frank G  2004-05-23 11:45:01 AM||   2004-05-23 11:45:01 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 I dunno about this Chalabi business, Frank.
I think it may be a way for State to get back at Rummy (the Pentagon).
He didn't go down for the Abu Ghraib "scandal" so they took out this guy.
Score one for Bremer and Foggy Bottom.
I'm sure Chalabi's crooked, but that's how he's survived as long as he did.

As for the story, we got 16 bad guys! Yea!
And our troops have cornered the chief asshat al-Sadr in this shithole town called Kufa!
Looks like the uprising may be about to lose all its air.
HOOAH!
Posted by Jen  2004-05-23 11:52:32 AM|| [http://www.greatestjeneration.com]  2004-05-23 11:52:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Aided by Iraqi civil defense forces, troops found AK-47s, rocket-propelled grenades, rocket launchers and more than 2,000 rounds of ammunition. Some of the weapons were stashed in the mosque’s minaret.

Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said Saturday that dozens of people killed in a U.S. attack in the Iraqi desert early Wednesday were attending a high-level meeting of foreign fighters, not a wedding. Kimmitt said six women were among the dead, but he said there was no evidence any children died in the raid near the Syrian border. Coalition officials have said as many as 40 people were killed.


Both of the above paragraphs were bolded (and that emphasis duly noted) in my original posting along with an "EFL" in the header. Any reason why these were altered (along with the article's title, which I understand)?
Posted by Zenster 2004-05-23 11:59:17 AM||   2004-05-23 11:59:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Git some back Zenster, GTA, Aris!
Posted by Harpi 2004-05-23 12:21:20 PM||   2004-05-23 12:21:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 I often have bolds or reformatting done to my posts - owner/editor's rights....
Posted by Frank G  2004-05-23 12:33:58 PM||   2004-05-23 12:33:58 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Thank you, Frank G. Just curious. I've yet to see any major context changes, so it's not a problem.
Posted by Zenster 2004-05-23 5:00:15 PM||   2004-05-23 5:00:15 PM|| Front Page Top

12:31 Shipman
12:31 Shipman
12:15 Shipman
12:15 Shipman
12:13 Gentile Shipman
12:13 Gentile Shipman
12:11 Gentile
12:11 Gentile
11:32 Phil B
11:22 ruprecht
11:19 ruprecht
10:57 Phil B
10:55 Robert Crawford
10:22 .com
10:06 Robert Crawford
09:52 CrazyFool
00:26 Atomic Conspiracy
00:19 Atomic Conspiracy
00:19 Mark Espinola
00:02 Mark Espinola
23:52 Mark Espinola
23:37 RWV
23:34 Jen
23:33 scott









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com