Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 04/04/2006 View Mon 04/03/2006 View Sat 04/01/2006 View Fri 03/31/2006 View Thu 03/30/2006 View Wed 03/29/2006 View Tue 03/28/2006
1
2006-04-04 Britain
More on Reid's call for the Geneva Conventions to be redrawn
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2006-04-04 01:22|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 How about applying the Golden Rule.
Posted by ed 2006-04-04 01:59||   2006-04-04 01:59|| Front Page Top

#2 Nix that. Couldn't sleep. Must have known I mistook the Golden Rule.

Golden Rule: Do unto others what you want to be done unto you.

Better: Do unto others as they do unto you. (Works for me.)

Best: The Real Golden Rule: Do unto others before they do unto you.
Posted by ed 2006-04-04 02:43||   2006-04-04 02:43|| Front Page Top

#3  Do unto others befo they do funky unto you. ยป:-)
Posted by RD 2006-04-04 07:06||   2006-04-04 07:06|| Front Page Top

#4 The Golden Rule works both ways, it also applies when the other person is a Murderous Asshole, then by the Golden rule that must be the way HE wants to be treated.
So follow the Golden Rule and kill him.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2006-04-04 08:45||   2006-04-04 08:45|| Front Page Top

#5 I think the problem is not in the Geneva Conventions, but in the asshats who THINK they know what's in the Geneva Conventions, or who SAY that their interpretations of the Geneva conventions ARE the Geneva conventions. The GC is inadequate in that it does not explicilty state what constitutes a violation that would free a signatory, making it a suicide pact in the hands of the left and the international glitterati and perveratti. I hear that the most recent addition proposed to the GC explicility FORBIDS retaliation for FAILURE to meet the GC requirments. We didn't sign it, and should propose an explicit "Going Roman" escape clause. It will be opposed, of course, but only by those without integrity who wish to bind those with integrity BY their integrity.

Posted by Ptah">Ptah  2006-04-04 10:03|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2006-04-04 10:03|| Front Page Top

16:52 Elmash Phing8221
16:11 Elmash Phing8221
13:58 Elmash Phing8221
13:44 Elmash Phing8221
13:11 Elmash Phing8221
00:03 JosephMendiola
23:59 Frank G
23:51 JosephMendiola
23:48 Old Patriot
23:45 FOTSGreg
23:39 Oldspook
23:37 DMFD
23:36 JosephMendiola
23:32 JosephMendiola
23:32 Steve White
23:30 Oztrailan
23:24 RWV
23:24 Oldspook
23:22 trailing wife
23:17 FOTSGreg
23:11 DMFD
23:02 twobyfour
23:00 trailing wife
22:54 twobyfour









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com