Article

2003-04-08 Fifth Column

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dar Steckelberg 2003-04-08 09:27 am|| || Front Page|| [11130 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 One of the Greenappeasement protestors was also previously arrested for trespassing on US military property, hindering the launch of the Star Wars missile defence shield thingie a couple of years back. Saw him clearly on the news, taking it again for Greenpeace-at-any-price.

Professional protestors all.

Time to give them professional jail sentences, though I feel sorry for that guy he is being used as a pawn (again).

Can't the government sue Greenpeace the corporate organisation for the expense of sending out the police rescue teams? public endangerment?

Surely there are civil damages to be awarded, money to be recouped?

And we could add the Greens on the list of defendants to be prosecuted, their MP Ian Cohen was also arrested to his great joy and pride.

Posted by anon1 2003-04-08 09:52:29|| 2003-04-08 09:52:29|| Front Page Top

#2 They shoulda just left them attached.

Posted by Rawsnacks 2003-04-08 09:54:47|| 2003-04-08 09:54:47|| Front Page Top

#3 Start a fashion - dongle-protestors!

Every navy'll want some...

Posted by mojo 2003-04-08 10:09:50|| 2003-04-08 10:09:50|| Front Page Top

#4 If it's possible to train dolphins to sweep mines and deal with frogmen, why not train orcas to consume Greenpeaceniks? Maybe it's because their anaemic vegan flesh tastes too much like tofu. Sadly it's the French who've shown the way when it comes to dealing with these ecopirates.

Posted by Bulldog 2003-04-08 10:40:07|| 2003-04-08 10:40:07|| Front Page Top

#5 After putting up with Greenpeace's antics for a while, the U.S. Navy started giving them some rough (and embarrassing) handling in the late 80s and early 90s. As a consequence, Greenpeace seems to be steering clear of the U.S. Navy and looking for more tolerant targets.

Posted by Patrick Phillips 2003-04-08 10:45:43|| 2003-04-08 10:45:43|| Front Page Top

#6 Maybe we should train orcas instead of dolphins.

"Mmmmm....Greenpeace Protesters......taste like chicken"

---Ollie the Orca

Posted by Alaska Paul 2003-04-08 10:50:39|| 2003-04-08 10:50:39|| Front Page Top

#7 Patrick--Got any links for goodies on that theme? I'd love to read a few!

Posted by Dar Steckelberg 2003-04-08 10:54:51|| 2003-04-08 10:54:51|| Front Page Top

#8 Greenpeacers eaten by whales? Is that one of those irony things?

Dar Steckelberg, sorry, but I'm going on memory. Back in '89 Greenpeace was blocking Trident missile tests by running their ship and several rubber rafts through the launch zone.

They got away with that ONCE. The next time there was a destroyer in the area that shouldered (that's a polite way of saying "not a direct ram") the Greenpeace ship out of the way while using firehouses to pour water into the ship's stack -- flooding the Greenpeace ship's boilers. Meanwhile, in the launch zone, waiting for the rubber rafts, were SEALS with knives. It was a short joyride for the rubber-raft drivers.

I don't know if there were any other consequences for Greenpeace. But ever since, you don't read too much about Greenpeace hassling the USN.

Posted by Patrick Phillips 2003-04-08 11:03:43|| 2003-04-08 11:03:43|| Front Page Top

#9 Heh, heh, heh. That's good enough! Thanks for the memories! :-)

Posted by Dar Steckelberg 2003-04-08 11:23:12|| 2003-04-08 11:23:12|| Front Page Top

#10 Patrick---Enjoyed the post. All we need is a little institutional memory to realize that the best way to deal with Greenpeace chaps is to use SEALS, so we don't need the orcas yet.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2003-04-08 13:30:02|| 2003-04-08 13:30:02|| Front Page Top

#11 Actually, that's a superb way to deal with all these idiots. I recommended to the State of Colorado that they begin targeting "environmental organizations" that try to stop the clearing of dead timber in State forests. Most of the time, these groups file nuisance lawsuits that stop the process until the State answers them. I suggested that every time there's a forest fire in Colorado that requires the State to respond, the people who have sued to stop logging and thinning be held accountable as "accessories after the fact". I haven't seen any OFFICIAL response, but supposedly one enviro group settled out of court for some big bucks.

There are consequences to behavior. More and more often, these "Environmental groups" cause more problems than they solve. They should be held accountable, in a court of law, for any expenses they force upon local, state, or federal government.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-04-08 13:57:25|| 2003-04-08 13:57:25|| Front Page Top

#12 Seems like everyone has their breaking point with Peagrease sooner or later. Like the American approach - must've been fun for (almost) all concerned, but the French way - blow up their flagship whilst the crew are asleep - had a certain finalite.

Posted by Bulldog 2003-04-08 14:00:45|| 2003-04-08 14:00:45|| Front Page Top

12:11 Anonymous
11:06 raptor
01:23 Anonymous
01:05 Anonymous
01:05 Anonymous
01:01 Anonymous
01:01 Anonymous
23:52 PD
23:46 anon1
23:39 PD
23:31 PD
23:23 Tresho
23:10 Former Russian Major
23:08 Former Russian Major
22:47 anon1
22:35 marek
22:28 B.
22:27 Fred
22:13 Bruce
21:58 Parabellum
21:55 Reed
21:53 Reed
21:52 Reed
21:52 Fred