Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 03/14/2006 View Mon 03/13/2006 View Sun 03/12/2006 View Sat 03/11/2006 View Fri 03/10/2006 View Thu 03/09/2006 View Wed 03/08/2006
1
2006-03-14 Home Front: Politix
Feingold Draws Little Support for Censure
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2006-03-14 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11130 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Let's censure f'ing feingold - betcha there'd be more support for that.

Asshole
Posted by  Barbara Skolaut"> Barbara Skolaut  2006-03-14 01:48|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]  2006-03-14 01:48|| Front Page Top

#2 I had no idea Karl Rove was this good.

Neither do the Democrats, but don't tell them that.
Posted by Charles 2006-03-14 03:56||   2006-03-14 03:56|| Front Page Top

#3 This kind of shit is why the Republicans don't seem to be that worried about Nov. The funny part is the GOP can let the Dims do all the work.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2006-03-14 08:20||   2006-03-14 08:20|| Front Page Top

#4 "... when the president thinks he can violate the law without consequences..."

I guess this is more of Feingold's "measured reactions" the USA Today was referring to the other day.
Posted by DepotGuy 2006-03-14 09:31||   2006-03-14 09:31|| Front Page Top

#5 End the debate. Bring it to a vote today.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-03-14 10:07||   2006-03-14 10:07|| Front Page Top

#6 Russell covets the White House - or at least a WH run. I bet he hasn't had this much MSM kissing and hugging for some time.
Posted by lotp 2006-03-14 10:09||   2006-03-14 10:09|| Front Page Top

#7 As usual, there's the plans within plans.

Feingold SAYS what Bush did was illegal, but what Feingold SAYS and what CONGRESS or a COURT says are three different things.

Feingold, in a sense, loses nothing in this maneuver: If Bush is censured, then he'll say that Congress agreed with him that what Bush did was illegal, and so requires a special prosecutor to pursue the issue, etc., etc..

On the other hand, if the measure is defeated, NO MENTION will be made that Congress AGREED WITH BUSH that what Bush did was LEGAL. It will all be waved away as partisianship, and not that a majority of senators agreed with Bush.

What? there are more Republican senators than Democratic senators in the Senate? Well tough shit, that's called HAVING AND USING A MAJORITY. The dems HAD IT AND USED IT, and now they scream when THEY DON'T HAVE IT AND CAN'T USE IT.

Integrity? Not a shred...
Posted by Ptah">Ptah  2006-03-14 11:11|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2006-03-14 11:11|| Front Page Top

#8 Sen. Feingold is speaking to the radical liberal left at the base of the Democratic Party to
appease and mobilize them for upcoming 2006
mid-term elections. These are the people calling for Bush's impeachment and removal from office. I'm quite sure he knows the censure proposal is more symbolic than realistic. Like Sen. Frist said this is "political gamemanship".

That I agree with in that Republicans consistantly demonized former President Clinton in an effort to motivate their radical rightwing conservative base and even went a step further to actually impeach him and have him removed from office. Even though they failed it gave the radical right the red meat the craved.
Posted by Just Curious 2006-03-14 11:27||   2006-03-14 11:27|| Front Page Top

#9 Image hosting by Photobucket
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-03-14 12:36||   2006-03-14 12:36|| Front Page Top

#10 cowards who bray at the President, yet don't have the courage of their convictions (wink wink Mr. Clinton) to put it down in a vote. The Murtha/Feingold party of accusers who slide back in the closet when the light's turned on. Is this the party to lead this country? Platform? We'll show it to ya right before the election.
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2006-03-14 13:53||   2006-03-14 13:53|| Front Page Top

#11 Murtha/Fiengold speak for themselves, not the
Democratic Party.
Posted by Just Curious 2006-03-14 14:06||   2006-03-14 14:06|| Front Page Top

#12 That's right - Dean, Pelosi, and Reid speak for the Dhimmidonks.

LOL.
Posted by Chetle Omath7541 2006-03-14 14:08||   2006-03-14 14:08|| Front Page Top

#13 I fail to see any humor in that...
I'd say those people have been as effective as
Bush has been ineffective, even in the minority..lmao

Maybe you need to check again Prez Bush latest poll#s and ask yourself why repubs up for election/re-election are getting as far away from him as they can as if he has the plague.
Posted by Just Curious 2006-03-14 14:20||   2006-03-14 14:20|| Front Page Top

#14 Poll #'s, even when not rigged, come and go, up and down. What matters is the ONE poll that occurs the first Tuesday of every other November. Your people have made a habit of showing your true selves, and your lack of substantive ideas and solutions, your transparent powerlust, in time for that poll - the one that actually counts - to kick a few more of you out on your asses each time.

You spit in the wind and think it's raining.

Waay too much time and bandwidth has been spent on your inanity.

Toodles. See you in November.
Posted by Chetle Omath7541 2006-03-14 14:34||   2006-03-14 14:34|| Front Page Top

#15 lack of ideas? Exactly WHAT good ideas have the republicans come up with? Apparently the american public doesnt think youre doing such a good job...

yeah, we'll see you in November.
Posted by Just Curious 2006-03-14 14:39||   2006-03-14 14:39|| Front Page Top

#16 Curious you came back to argue more today.
After the Feingold body slam one would think Just Curious would have the good sense to lay there and bleed a while.
Posted by wxjames 2006-03-14 16:29||   2006-03-14 16:29|| Front Page Top

#17 questions, questions, eh JC?

So many questions in your mind and zero ability to present answers.
Posted by 2b 2006-03-14 16:33||   2006-03-14 16:33|| Front Page Top

#18 yeah, we'll see you in November.

That's what we heard in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2005.

How's that working for ya?
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2006-03-14 16:34|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2006-03-14 16:34|| Front Page Top

#19 wxjames:

you have a very vivd imagination. the only body slam occured there and it damn sure didnt involve me.

buy yeah, I'm impressed by the "intellectual firepower" from the regular posters in this site.

I just cant keep up...rotflmao..too damn funny
Posted by Just Curious 2006-03-14 16:47||   2006-03-14 16:47|| Front Page Top

#20 JC thinks he's a zen master when in fact he's just a five year old in the back seat asking "are we there yet?". Heh.
Posted by Gleper Jaque6309 2006-03-14 16:56||   2006-03-14 16:56|| Front Page Top

#21 ROFLMAO a hell of a retort JC. 3.2
Posted by 6 2006-03-14 18:16||   2006-03-14 18:16|| Front Page Top

#22 You can use 2xROFLMAO for an even sharper argument.
Posted by 6 2006-03-14 18:16||   2006-03-14 18:16|| Front Page Top

#23 Little support? The donks are running away from this stink bomb.
Posted by Captain America 2006-03-14 18:40||   2006-03-14 18:40|| Front Page Top

10:50 mmurray821
23:59 Snuns Thromp1484
23:58 JosephMendiola
23:49 phil_b
23:44 Snuns Thromp1484
23:41 DMFD
23:36 trailing wife
23:30 lotp
23:28 DMFD
23:27 Angump Slomosing6697
23:19 Formerly Dan
23:16 3dc
23:11 Inspector Clueso
22:49 JosephMendiola
22:34 BH
22:26 Frank G
22:25 JosephMendiola
22:24 Frank G
22:18 Frank G
22:13 Frank G
22:13 Frank G
22:02 JosephMendiola
21:54 Ulaigum Ebbereck6419
21:51 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com