Article

2006-02-12 Europe

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2006-02-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Well, at least two out of those three countries are going to be on the receiving end of Western culture dropped from 35,000 feet very soon.

Posted by RWV 2006-02-12 00:13|| 2006-02-12 00:13|| Front Page Top

#2 They are doing it because Denmark is head of the UN Security Con. when Iran comes up.

Posted by 3dc 2006-02-12 01:50|| 2006-02-12 01:50|| Front Page Top

#3 I must admit I am confused by the Islamofascists timing on this one.

I thought perhaps the bastards had a terror attack planned and were using this to prepare the ground so it didn't alienate muslims or win sympathy for the West. But nothing has happened yet.

Then I thought perhaps the fascists thought this a good way of getting the US kicked out of Iraq: inflame the muslims against the idea of freedom of speech soon it will bounce back on the US and Iraqis will oppose them more, kill them with roadside bombs and Iraq will fall in a heap they can turn into an islamic paradise. Victory: islamofascists. Possible, and this might be a welcome side effect anyway no matter what purpose they had in mind.

Another theory: that they simply want to stir up hatred between the West and Islamic states, this serves many purposes. It gets them more money, more recruits, pressures moderate muslim governments to declare allegiance with the religious fascists and make concessions and gives them more clout in general.

this is the one i'm most sold on at the moment because the timing seems so random yet the effects are clearly an end in themselves - the west has sunk into dhimmitude grovelling and apologising and giving up freedom of speech. Added bonus for the islamofascists there. Bet they never thought victory would be so easy.

The fourth theory is that it's because Denmark heads security council when Iran comes up for review.

Sounds like a great theory but why the random timing.

If this was planned with that end in mind, why unleash the Islamonazis now instead of after Denmark assumes the chair and right before Iran is up for review.

It doesn't make sense to do it before. It will lose momentum by the time Denmark takes over.

Anybody else got any idea why they picked now, and why denmark when they could have picked any one at any time?

Posted by anon1 2006-02-12 11:55|| 2006-02-12 11:55|| Front Page Top

07:14 Constitutional Individualist
02:22 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
23:53 SteveS
23:33 RD
23:32 plainslow
23:19 Verlaine in Iraq
23:18 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
23:14 USN Ret.
23:00 Robert Crawford
22:55 Robert Crawford
22:51 plainslow
22:50 Robert Crawford
22:48 Frank G
22:40 bgrebel
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:25 Barbara Skolaut
22:21 Jules
22:05 Pappy
21:48 Inspector Clueso
21:43 Fran Disco Librarian
21:34 Humourless
21:33 Duh!
21:32 Besoeker