Article

2007-02-20 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

B. Raman: Israeli Air Raid On Natanz, Isfahan Shortly

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by RD 2007-02-20 01:32|| || Front Page|| [11130 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 #5 If When Israel takes out the Iranian threat the shitbirds in Congress will foam at the mouth and Prez Bush will be able to laugh at them.

win win

Posted by RD 2007-02-20 12:19|| 2007-02-20 12:19|| Front Page Top

#2 "For Israel, the question is not whether Iran has the intention to acquire a military nuclear capability. The question is should Iran be allowed to have an infrastructure capable of being used for military nuclear purposes even if it does not have the intention at present to use it for military purposes. Once it is allowed to have the infrastructure, any time---clandestinely and at short notice--- it would be able to acquire a military nuclear capability and confront Israel with a nuclear fait accompli".

I agree totally with this paragraph.This needs to be told/sold to the whole world especially the LEFT!!!!!

Posted by Ebbolump Glomotle9608 2007-02-20 12:27|| 2007-02-20 12:27|| Front Page Top

#3 I have seen this senerio of a Isreali first strike a couple of times of late. Usually it is played as Isreali first strike provoking Iran into hitting Isreal directley back (limited ability due to arrow and Patriots) so Iran goes for the near targets Persian Gulf and US bases Iraq. Result is we jump in in "defense" mode hammering Iran down (doing the actual effective degredation of the Iranian program).

Saddly this is a senerio that exist only becuase of the LLL's Sedition of the Iraq campain to the point were we have to allow a known enemy get first blow on a open chin to be allowed to do what must be done. Sad days we live in indeed.

Posted by C-Low 2007-02-20 17:11|| 2007-02-20 17:11|| Front Page Top

#4 No RD, the "shitbirds" world over will demand a strong and tangible international response to "Israeli Aggression".
Do you trust Bush not to go along with it? Because I don't.

Posted by gromgoru 2007-02-20 18:18|| 2007-02-20 18:18|| Front Page Top

#5 No RD, the "shitbirds" world over will demand a strong and tangible international response to "Israeli Aggression".
Do you trust Bush not to go along with it? Because I don't.

point taken sort of, BUT Israel's very existence is at stake, so promised the Assatollas and the Dinnertjacket many times.

Israel must tell the world to fuck off because the Iranians have left them no other choice.

Grom If you don't trust President Bush to stand up to and defend Israel against shitbirds even when they demand Israel's scalp, stamp their feet and whine for a "strong and tangible international response to "Israeli Aggression"", then Grom you must not trust that he will ever attack Iran in a meaningful way in the next two years either.

Using your postulate, unless you believe that a direct descendant of Machiavelli will trick the President Bush [with a Zimmermann tele] into making Iran glow at night, Who will destroy the Iranian nukes?

Israel must save herself,
NEVER AGAIN!
To Hell with the shitbirds, they can eat more sh*t and die.

Posted by RD 2007-02-20 21:06|| 2007-02-20 21:06|| Front Page Top

23:11 3dc
23:09 twobyfour
23:03 badanov
22:53 3dc
22:45 USN, ret.
22:42 Barbara Skolaut
22:39 Barbara Skolaut
22:36 USN, ret.
22:34 Frank G
22:22 anymouse
22:16 SteveS
22:07 Hank
22:03 GK
21:58 DanNY
21:55 Grunter
21:38 RD
21:31 no mo uro
21:27 xbalanke
21:22 RD
21:20 DarthVader
21:19 Nimble Spemble
21:15 Shush Omolung9989
21:15 RD
21:12 Pappy