Article

2010-01-04 Home Front: WoT

"Reasonable Suspicion" and Intelligence Failures on Flight 235

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-01-04 03:55|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 So, if one is exercises the legal term "reasonable suspicion" in the affirmative and is subsequently found to be incorrect, can they then be said to have been unreasonably suspecious? Were the actions of MI-5 and MI-6 unreasonable?

The lack of "reasonable suspicion" then renders the subject, unquestionable, undoubted, palpable, indubious, requiring no further examiniation, tracking, or action?

Evidently the data available at the time did not provide a ~~potential likelihood or factor of probability~~ "reasonable suspicion" therefore no intelligence failure took place.

Ok, I get it now.

Posted by Besoeker 2010-01-04 11:10|| 2010-01-04 11:10|| Front Page Top

#2 So that's what Napolitano meant with "The system worked". I got it now!

Posted by Bobby 2010-01-04 12:06|| 2010-01-04 12:06|| Front Page Top

23:56 trailing wife
23:38 Zhang Fei
23:28 Zhang Fei
23:14 Pappy
22:56 trailing wife
22:52 trailing wife
22:49 trailing wife
22:36 trailing wife
22:33 trailing wife
22:16 SteveS
22:14 SteveS
22:14 trailing wife
22:10 trailing wife
22:07 trailing wife
22:07 Snarky Linker
22:02 trailing wife
21:59 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:50 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:42 JosephMendiola
21:41 JosephMendiola
21:40 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:37 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:33 JosephMendiola
21:29 Pappy