[PJMedia] A rematch of an Ohio primary race between Bernie Sanders acolyte Nina Turner and establishment Democrat Shontel Brown ended up with Brown once again prevailing and the radical left licking its wounds and blaming Jewish groups for Turner’s defeat.
Turner was backed at the last minute by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). But one group of Turner’s primary supporters, the radical Justice Democrats, declined to back her because pro-Israel super PACs run by DMFI (Democratic Majority for Israel) and AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) “massively outgunned” Turner’s fundraisers.
Turner and Brown were competing to see who would represent Ohio’s 11th Congressional District. Brown previously beat Turner in a 2021 special election primary to fill the seat of former Rep. Marcia Fudge, whom Biden chose as his Housing and Urban Development secretary. Since the 11th is a safe Democratic seat, the winner of the Democratic primary is an almost certain winner in November’s midterms.
In the end, it wasn’t even close. Brown prevailed 65%-35%. And the Justice Democrats scapegoated the Jews for her defeat.
Posted by: Skidmark ||
05/04/2022 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[2 views]
Top|| File under: Tin Hat Dictators, Presidents for Life,
#1
Screenshots of tweets with photos of the lady in question. The colour of the gown is lovely for her, but the design makes her look old and fat. And while she remembered to be botoxed and take a nap so she’d looked rested, there was no time to visit the hair salon, and she forgot both jewelry and Bill.
Well, yes. That’s the sad nature of his condition.
President Biden stumbled repeatedly Tuesday during remarks on US aid to Ukraine — saying the United States "made sure Russia had Javelins" and noting the successful "Hungarian" resistance to Russia’s invasion.
Biden made the glaring gaffes at an Alabama facility that makes the anti-tank missiles.
The context of Biden’s remarks made clear he knew the US was actually arming Ukraine’s government with the sophisticated weapon, and he correctly identified the recipient nation at some points in his remarks.
"Before Russia attacked, we made sure Russia had Javelins and other weapons to strengthen their defenses so Ukraine was ready for whatever happened," Biden said midway through his 16-minute speech at the plant. "Isn't that right, Mommy? I mean Dr. Jill, our President"
Later, Biden said, "Just a few days ago, the Wall Street Journal quoted a young Hungarian fighter saying, ’Without the Javelins, it would have been very hard to stop the enemy pushing ahead.'"
The Journal’s report actually quoted a private first class named Oleksandr in Ukraine’s 128th Separate Mountain Assault Transcarpathian Brigade. The article does not identify him as Hungarian.
The president, who turns 80 this year, ironically began his remarks joking about his propensity to misspeak.
Posted by: Frank G ||
05/04/2022 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[5 views]
Top|| File under: Tin Hat Dictators, Presidents for Life, & Kleptocrats
#1
Three weeks ago Joe referred to Michelle Obama as Vice President, not Kamala Harris.
#3
Could he just shut up?!? There have been caricatures about bumbling US Presidents (remember the absolute disdain about Ronnie "Ray Gun" ?) before but ... Gawd he is stoopid!
#5
Later today, White House spokes-droid, Peppermint Psaki, will clarify that President Biden was referring to the Hungarian Defense in the game of chess and that the 'javelins' sent to Russia were actually javelinas, small feral pigs native to the American Southwest.
#7
Kachina dolls are supposed to be somewhat soul bearing. I think Bidet's more of a Monopoly piece. Maybe the little metal boot or the schnauzer
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
05/04/2022 14:17 Comments ||
Top||
#8
Never understand the whisperings from The Spirit World through their vassal Joe Biden about how child sacrificial murder will save the world by allowing the Moon to devour the Sun and prevent Global Warming with that attitude, and how victory can only be achieved by total worship of Thunderbird.
[DW] A US federal jury disagreed with Thomas Webster's claim that he acted in self defense after seeing footage of the incident. Webster struck an officer with a metal pole.
Thomas Webster, a retired New York City policeman, was convicted of assaulting an officer on Monday when a federal jury rejected his defense that he acted in self-defense while participating in the January 6, 2021 riot at the US Capitol.
The 56-year-old was both the first to be charged with assault over the riots as well as the first to try and claim self-defense
WHAT WERE THE DETAILS OF THE CHARGE?
Webster, who was a NYPD officer for 20 years, had been indicted on six counts, including a charge that he assaulted Metropolitan Police Department officer Noah Rathbun with a dangerous weapon, in this case a metal flagpole.
He claimed that Rathbun instigated the confrontation. He called Rathbun a "rogue cop" who tried to punch him in the face.
Rathbun testified that he didn't punch or pick a fight with Webster.
On January 6, a violent mostly peaceful mob attacked the Capitol , disrupting Congress from certifying President Joe The Big Guy Biden ...46th president of the U.S. I'm not working for you. Don't be such a horse's ass. Don't say he didn't warn us... 's 2020 election victory over then-President Donald Trump ...Perhaps no man has ever had as much fun being president of the US... The federal jury convicted Webster on all six counts.
'THERE WAS NO SELF-DEFENSE'
Two jurors who spoke to news hounds after the verdict said videos capturing the officer's assault from multiple angles were crucial evidence rebutting Webster's self-defense argument.
"I guess we were all surprised that he would even make that defense argument," said a juror who spoke on condition of anonymity. "There was no dissention among us at all. We unanimously agreed that there was no self-defense argument here.''
Although prosecutors asking for Webster to be detained, the judge ruled that he wil remain free until his sentencing because he has complied with current conditions of release and doesn't have any prior convictions.
Webster drove from his home in New York to Washington DC on the eve of January 6, attending former President Trump's the "Stop the Steal" rally the next day and then moving with the crowd as it marched towards the Capitol.
Rathbun's body camera captured Webster shouting profanities at the officer before slamming a bike rack at the police. Rathbun then hit Webster, pushing him back into the crowd that was surging around the police barricade. Webster then swung a metal flag pole at the officer in a downward chopping motion, striking a bike rack. Rathbun grabbed the broken pole from Webster, who charged at the officer, tackled him to the ground and grabbed his gas mask.
More than 780 people have been charged with riot-related federal crimes. The Justice Department says more than 245 of them have been charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement. More than 100 officers were maimed in the riot.
#1
Laptop repairman who Hunter Biden abandoned his laptop with and never came to pick it up is suing Adam Schiffty, CNN, Politico and The Daily Beast for defamation for 1 million in Benjamins.
[Bearing Arms] Early voting in Georgia’s primary elections kicks off today ahead of the official primary day on May 24th, and Democrat Stacey Abrams, who’s running unopposed for her party’s nomination, is already signaling that she plans on making Constitutional Carry an issue in the general election, where she’s likely to take on incumbent Gov. Brian Kemp.
Recent polling in the state shows Kemp’s lead over his primary opponents, including Trump-endorsed former U.S. Senator David Perdue, growing so large that he may be able to win the primary outright with more than 50% of the vote, which would allow him to avoid an expensive and potentially bruising runoff. Kemp, who signed Constitutional Carry into law just a few weeks ago, is also comfortably ahead of Abrams in head-to-head polling, but Abrams is hoping to change those numbers by running on repealing the new law if elected.
#2
I think what the inline meant was that the old saying "How can you tell when he's lying? His lips are moving." has to be updated to "How can you tell he's lying? He has a pulse."
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
05/04/2022 6:56 Comments ||
Top||
#3
It’s a variation, M, and I got caught in a grammar glitch, resulting in two tenses when I should have chosen one or the other: either has lied or just lies.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
05/04/2022 10:40 Comments ||
Top||
#11
Do I actually find myself agreeing with Elizabeth Warren? I am also opposed to extremist justices who want to impose their views on Americans. Starting with Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, etc.
One benefit of the upcoming decision is that in our republic, finally more than 9 people will be able to vote on abortion.
Posted by: Tom ||
05/04/2022 11:48 Comments ||
Top||
#12
Murkowski feels she was lied to. I guess she is developing empathy for most GOP voters since Reagan.
Posted by: Super Hose ||
05/04/2022 13:03 Comments ||
Top||
#13
I think it's always cute in an ironic way when a politician complains about being lied to.
Not that I think that happened in this case.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
05/04/2022 13:05 Comments ||
Top||
#14
I liked the part where Biden referred to the clump of parasitic cells removed from the host as A Child, implicitly acknowledging A Mother.
#15
In 1982 Biden supported a constitutional amendment to overturn Roe vs Wade. He's got a right to change his mind, but I think this is just a matter of knowing what it takes to support his base.
[JustTheNews] Texas lawsuit exposes regulatory change limiting judges' power to deport, creating numerous loopholes for aliens.
Facing mounting losses in the courts over its immigration policies, the Biden administration has invented a new tactic for keeping as many illegal aliens in the country as possible: Create a circular bureaucratic process loop indefinitely delaying deportation.
The newest tactic was exposed last week in a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenging obscure regulatory changes by the Homeland Security Department that shifted the power to deport away from immigration judges to civilian bureaucrats while allowing aliens multiple means of delaying and appealing.
"The Interim Rule sets forth all kinds of exceptions from the procedures and timelines in the new regulations, generally always inuring to the alien's benefit," Paxton wrote in his lawsuit.
"In summary, the Interim Rule transfers significant authority from immigration judges to asylum officers, grants those asylum officers significant additional authority, limits immigration-judge review to denials of applications, and upends the entire adjudicatory system to the benefit of aliens," the suit added.
The vast majority of asylum cases that reach an immigration judge are rejected, about 71% of the time under President Trump, though it fell to 63% in the first year of the Biden presidency. And most aliens are then subjected to expedited removal.
What the Biden administration did is create interim rules that significantly bypass the immigration judges, allowing civilian bureaucrats working for the Customs and Immigration Service to take new actions that delay or circumvent expedited removal.
The Texas lawsuit noted several of the changes, including that "individuals subject to expedited removal and found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture would have their claims for asylum, withholding of removal ... or Convention Against Torture ... protection initially adjudicated by USCIS following a nonadversarial interview before an asylum officer."
Aliens who lose at the immigration court level now can appeal and and get reconsidered by the CIS bureaucracy under most favorable conditions, the Texas suit noted. And aliens who lose at both the court and CIS level and facing "expedited removal proceedings would be eligible for consideration for parole."
John Zadrozny, a former White House immigration adviser to President Trump, told Just the News the new rules have simply created a circular bureaucratic process with little end in sight, meaning most aliens who enter it can stay in America indefinitely for years.
"What this rule basically does is it destroys expedited removal for all intents and purposes, and creates an endless loop of review that will prevent an alien from really ever being removed under the expedited removal process," Zadrozny explained during an interview Monday on the John Solomon Reports podcast.
"We're calling this the 'Alien always wins rule,' because that's basically what it is: It's designed to prevent them from [ever] getting a final negative adjudication" authorizing their removal from the country," Zadrozny said.
Paxton said his 11th lawsuit since 2021 challenging Biden immigration policies — many of which have already prevailed — is designed to challenge a process that leaves illegal aliens in the driver's seat to stay in the country.
"The last thing Texas needs is for this Administration to make it easier for illegal aliens to enter the U.S. and obtain asylum through false claims and less oversight," Paxton said.
"We know what's going to happen when the rule goes into effect in May 2022: wave upon wave of illegal aliens claiming 'asylum.' It's true that our immigration system is extremely backlogged. But the answer is to secure the border, not overwhelm it even more by enacting cheap, easy incentives for illegal aliens to get into the United States."
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
...46th president of the U.S. 
