[Daily Caller] Boeing's CEO refused a shareholder request Monday to release emails between company officials and the State Department that may have been deleted from Hillary Clinton's server.
David Almasi, executive director of the National Center for Public Policy Research, requested the disclosure at the company's annual shareholder meeting Monday, but was rebuffed by Boeing's CEO, according to a press release.
Clinton has been under fire in recent months following revelations that she used a private email address for official correspondence while serving as Secretary of State, and that her staff has since deleted more than half of the messages.
Noting that Boeing had already successfully blocked a resolution calling on it to release correspondence it may have had with the Clinton Foundation, Almasi said, "you still have the opportunity to set the record straight that every communication between Boeing and the State Department was above board. Will you release every email and communication that Boeing officials had relating to donations to the Clinton Foundation, and with the State Department?"
a blistering indictment of the Grifters and their Liberal enablers. A taste:
The Democrat Party's investment in Hillary Clinton is too substantial for any such reckoning. Liberals have embraced the Cold-War cliche ‐ "of course, he is a SOB, but he's our SOB." Translated to Hillary that means she is a tough political brawler, she's on their side, and she's all they got ‐ and therefore anything such an asset does is more or less tolerable in an imperfect world. Democrats expect her to weather this mess. Each time she does so, the next and more egregious scandal becomes more "old news." The family's Nietzschean creed is that any scandal that does not kill off their careers makes a Clinton stronger. Despite the dozen or so ethical scandals that will inevitably arise over the next two years, Hillary Clinton will be nominated by the Democrats and has at least a 50/50 chance of being elected president. The Democratic elite will call her survival "fully vetted" and "time tested."
But all that said, the House of Clinton has utterly collapsed in a moral sense. The very name Clinton is now synonymous with amorality and will be so for the rest of American history. It is not that the Clintons are immoral and thus break existing moral canons and laws; rather they operate completely outside of any moral universe. To them, there is no such thing as moral or immoral, legal or illegal, ethical or unethical, only whether their aim is judged lucrative and the means to obtain it without serious liability. A form, a disclosure, a protocol for a Clinton is not a question of signing it as required or not signing it; rather, for them, such a requirement simply does not exist. Clintons do not erase emails; they destroy the server to ensure erased emails are erased for good.
Posted by: Frank G ||
04/29/2015 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[0 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
There's up to a third of the voting block who would welcome a king, autocrat, or even dictator, as long as it was theirs. They'll show no mercy to you. They'll justify it in what ever way they can, but ultimately its just Freudian projection. Why waste time an effort dealing with these creatures.
#2
The fall of the Clintons? It has been predicted before and yet they still keep on keeping on just like a bad case of incurable disease or like Freddy Kruger. There is a left wing element that would vote for a yellow dog so long as it had a "D" after its name. They are basically single issue voters who vote for their particular tribe's issue. They don't care who the candidate is so long as its a womyn, or black, or this or that--whatever they happen to think is chic, cheeky or in vogue. They forgive the lack of character of the candidate because the candidate is on the same side of the issue and represents the same ax to grind as they have. They care little about the welfare of the country or where the country goes so long as it goes in their particular direction or in other words gives them what they want...and now! This particular segment is the most pampered, spoiled and self-centered, narcissistic segment of society we have ever seen.
[The Right Scoop] An interview came out by Director Joel Gilbert with Malik Obama, Barack Obama's half brother supposedly revealing all sorts of laundry on President Obama of abandoning his Muslim family in Kenya and adding that Malik now also suspects that his half brother Barack could be illegitimate, which the question then becomes: who to believe, the polygamist (Malik) or the suspected bastard (Obama) or even the opportunist Joel Gilbert who should be ashamed of himself as we shall see.
I would take the side of the suspected bastard in this case: Barak Hussein Obama. Here is why this interview is worthless and Gilbert should be shamed of himself. Malik, the polygamist lied when he was asked about his living condition claiming he was living in poverty, so why trust anything else he says? Gilbert should be ashamed to go below the belt and suggest that Barack is a bastard without presenting real evidence. That, plus, he should have known better that Malik is a first class liar. Instead of exposing the Islamist connection (which we did the most extensive research on the topic) he opted for smear.
Malik who claimed to live in "poverty" seems to have enough money he gained from his relationship with his half brother Barack to build a center claiming it was a public facility. But according to several sources, this center is a "hotel" with a restaurant: "The meeting was conducted in the only hotel in Kogelo which carries the name Barack H. Obama Recreation Center and Rest Area" (Egyptian Al-Masry 11, 6, 2012). Well at least I have something in common with Malik.
[Free Bacon] Secretary of State John Kerry told his Iranian counterpart that he wished the United States had a leader more like Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, according to comments made by a senior Iranian cleric and repeated in the country's state-run media. "Et tu, Brute ?"
#2
Kerry Told Iran He Wishes 'U.S. Had a Leader like Iran's Supreme Leader'
Reward your cronies - check
Flip your finger to representative government - check
Rule by fiat - check
Create chaos and mayhem (think Libya et al) - check
Destroy your middle class - check
Play one internal group against another - check
Hate Israel - check
Blame America for all your problems - check
[Breitbart] During his press conference today, President Obama addressed the violence in Baltimore, claiming his political agenda would help solve some of the problems found in impoverished urban communities, such as the one where the violence occurred. Alright, so you've had 6 years. How much more time do you or LBJ's 'Great Society' actually need? Wait! Let me do the math...51 total years is it now? Please give us a new number, a new myth.
"There's a bunch of my agenda that would make difference right now in that," he said, calling for more funding for early education, criminal justice reform and job training. More funding is it? Imagine that. Money, the usual donk antidote and sacred mantra of the community organizer. Obama criticized members of Congress for blocking his agenda items, but encouraged Americans to do some "soul searching" during his joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe this afternoon. Yes of course, Americans must 'soul search', it's actually all our fault anyway. "I'm under no illusion that under this Congress we're going to get massive investments in urban communities," he said, adding that it was important to work to improve communities anyway. Translation: It doesn't matter what he Congress and the American people want, Champ knows best and will do it his way.
He explained Americans should not "just pay attention to these communities when a CVS burns," but rather work together to tackle poverty around the nation. Yes, yes, yes....you racist Americans pay attention.
"[W]hat I've tried to do is promote those ideas that would make a difference, but I think we all understand that politics is tough because it's easy to ignore those problems or to treat them as a law and order issue as opposed to a broader social issue," he said. It all begins with law and order, the rule of law is the foundation. All else is potential anarchy. Check out the Japanese model while you're there.
Obama also suggested that the media was once again overplaying the violent protests while ignoring the peaceful ones done by community organizers in the Baltimore community. I agree, urban rioting, the torching of 145 automobiles and 15 businesses a few miles north of the nation's capital.... not actually newsworthy. Yawns, calmly kliks over to 'Wheel of Fortune'.
"One burning building will be looped on television over and over and over again and the thousands of demonstrators who did it the right way, I think, have been lost in the discussion," he said. Did what the 'right way', break windows, loot, stone the police ?
The things Obama talks about were a scam when LBJ talked about them and are a scam now. Beyond relief from starvation, nothing can be done to elevate many people, regardless of their race. They do not have the intelligence or work ethic or inherent skills or correct personality traits to do better than rented housing, simple food, and cheesy entertainment. A better education system might help some maximize their lives, but not all or even most. The reality is that many Americans - not just black people in inner cities, but people of all races in all areas - want the stuff without the ability to delay gratification or make sacrifices or work very hard. That attitude is what happens when you don't keep score in soccer and everyone gets a trophy, just as much as when Democrat politicians tell you that the only reason you don't own a house and a nice car is racism, and that envy is a virtue and not a vice. "Stuff" isn't a right.
Posted by: no mo uro ||
04/29/2015 6:05 Comments ||
Top||
#3
What happened to all that trillion dollar stimulus from 2009? That was a Donk Congress. You had the means and choice between shovel ready (low skill) projects or crony politics. You chose crony politics. Reap what you have sowed. However, you, just like the community, blame everyone else but yourselves. That's why you fail.
#4
We've destroyed the family unit, the values of faith, and exported the old middle class jobs. We've devalued discipline and slef-discipline. It hsould be no surprise that the trillions of dollars thrown at the 'problem' over the last half century have been 'insuffucient.'
#6
President Obama says the Baltimore rioters that chose to loot, burn, and attack police aren’t true demonstrators at all – why they’re just plain “thugs”. Not content with a simple denunciation of criminal actions and the folly of pissing in ones’ own water bucket, Obama is compelled to continue his lecture on the perceived inequities that face Americas’ minority populations. Similarly, President Obama has repeatedly said Islamic terrorists aren’t true Muslims – they’re simply common criminals. And bound by his postmodernism roots he routinely provides ethical equivalent arguments based on ancient atrocities. In both cases Obamas’ Social Justice Sermons allude to a greater oppressor as the root cause. Thus alleviating individual responsibility (criminals as well as the larger group) and advocating government solutions. Moreover, by now those that’ve paid attention should know who the “Oppressors” are.
#7
no mo uro, In the past the uneducated unskilled workers were doing all the jobs that illegals are doing now (carwash, construction, gardening, etc).
The problem is few are connecting the dots between higher minimum wage, increased illegal immigration, increased welfare, and growing welfare rolls in the black community.
After the WWII peace dividend ran out in the '70's, both political parties used various techniques to try and fool people into believing it would last forever. One of the things they did was bloat the federal government in order to create higher paying "jobs" for native born Americans who had told themselves (and were propagandized to believe it by Madison Avenue and Wall Street and the entertainment and education industries) that they couldn't possibly work for such a low wage as the jobs you mentioned actually paid. But the tasks that you describe still needed to be done.
Trouble was that you can't pay much more than a few dollars per hour for that type of work because that's all it's worth in a world labor market. So the way politicians dealt with this was by allowing illegal aliens in, and telling native born Americans that "working class" was something vastly more than what it actually is in terms of material standard of living and that they were "above all that".
Now the chickens are coming home to roost. The size of the publicly employed sector needs to be diminished by 50% or more, and illegal immigrants need to go away, and the former government employees need to do those jobs the illegals were doing, even if it means a massive downward adjustment in their income stream. This MUST happen, but the way of doing it will be tricky. Any way you slice it violence will happen since this will be a massive disruption of the status quo.
It's loin-girding time.
Posted by: no mo uro ||
04/29/2015 15:38 Comments ||
Top||
#9
Provocative analysis NMU. I think we'll all be knee deep in empty shell casings and hand grenade pins before para #3 happens, but good luck with it anyway.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[Free Bacon] Secretary of State John Kerry told his Iranian counterpart that he wished the United States had a leader more like Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, according to comments made by a senior Iranian cleric and repeated in the country's state-run media.
