Hi there, !
Today Sat 03/14/2009 Fri 03/13/2009 Thu 03/12/2009 Wed 03/11/2009 Tue 03/10/2009 Mon 03/09/2009 Sat 03/07/2009 Archives
Rantburg
532759 articles and 1859197 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 85 articles and 303 comments as of 9:53.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    WoT Background    Non-WoT        Politix   
Boomer near Sri Lanka mosque kills 15
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 4: Opinion
5 00:00 Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 [] 
1 00:00 JohnQC [] 
6 00:00 Pappy [3] 
5 00:00 Pappy [1] 
1 00:00 AlanC [] 
2 00:00 Mike [] 
2 00:00 phil_b [1] 
1 00:00 Old Patriot [1] 
19 00:00 trailing wife [3] 
2 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
1 00:00 JohnQC [1] 
2 00:00 DoDo [] 
0 [] 
0 [] 
1 00:00 Kofi Glavising1975 [] 
1 00:00 Redneck Jim [] 
0 [] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
2 00:00 A_Rovian_Desciple [2]
3 00:00 Anonymoose [1]
16 00:00 Pappy [5]
3 00:00 logi_cal [1]
1 00:00 g(r)omgoru []
2 00:00 Red Dawg []
0 []
10 00:00 WTF [2]
2 00:00 tu3031 [1]
3 00:00 Seafarious [1]
Page 2: WoT Background
0 []
7 00:00 Redneck Jim []
8 00:00 Skunky Glins 5*** [4]
12 00:00 john frum [2]
0 []
9 00:00 trailing wife [3]
1 00:00 Frank G []
2 00:00 Mitch H. [1]
16 00:00 JosephMendiola []
5 00:00 logi_cal [1]
5 00:00 Ebbang Uluque6305 []
13 00:00 Red Dawg [1]
1 00:00 ed []
4 00:00 Glenmore [1]
1 00:00 Redneck Jim [2]
6 00:00 Frank G []
2 00:00 Redneck Jim []
1 00:00 Mitch H. [1]
0 []
0 []
4 00:00 mojo []
0 [3]
3 00:00 JosephMendiola []
0 [1]
3 00:00 Mitch H. [1]
0 [1]
2 00:00 William Marcy Tweed [1]
0 [1]
Page 3: Non-WoT
0 [1]
4 00:00 CrazyFool [2]
0 [1]
0 []
4 00:00 Skunky Glins 5*** [2]
4 00:00 JosephMendiola [1]
0 [1]
4 00:00 Steve White []
0 [1]
1 00:00 Anon4021 []
1 00:00 tu3031 [4]
2 00:00 Glenmore []
7 00:00 trailing wife [3]
5 00:00 Frank G [1]
1 00:00 Wheagum Protector of the Antelope2443 [1]
0 []
3 00:00 Chaviper McCoy1397 [3]
0 []
2 00:00 Redneck Jim []
8 00:00 Injun Hupaique4861 []
1 00:00 Ebbomoper Dark Lord of the Swedes3164 []
0 []
2 00:00 Frank G []
18 00:00 CrazyFool [2]
4 00:00 SON OF TOLUI []
Page 6: Politix
0 []
4 00:00 tu3031 []
12 00:00 Grunter [2]
14 00:00 DMFD [3]
4 00:00 trailing wife [1]
Afghanistan
Beware the 'moderate' Taliban
By Christopher Hitchens
Posted by: ryuge || 03/11/2009 06:45 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Moderate muslims? Is there such a thing?
Posted by: JohnQC || 03/11/2009 19:12 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
The Last Capitalist
No comment needed
Posted by: mercutio || 03/11/2009 15:43 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Tax cuts--Truly a stimulus package. We all pay too many taxes. The screwing we get isn't worth the screwing we get. Maybe taxation without representation is a better deal.
Posted by: JohnQC || 03/11/2009 19:07 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
Obama plan hits blue states hardest
Yes, we have a Sympathy Meter ...
In mounting an aggressive push toward universal health care, President Barack Obama is exposing one of the central ironies of offering insurance to all: The states most likely to profit are the ones that voted against him last November and whose congressional leaders are least likely to support it.

Red states across the South, which now offer limited benefits to low-income residents, stand to receive billions of dollars to cover large populations of uninsured citizens. Blue states in the North and Midwest, which are wealthier and already offer insurance to many, are likely to take a financial hit.

Obama may have been alluding to some of those divides when he predicted that geography could play a major role in the coming health care fight. "Some of the issues surrounding health care -- the way it cuts isn't even going to be Democratic/Republican," Obama said in a little-­noticed aside at a White House fiscal summit last week. "There may be regional differences. There may be a whole host of other differences," he added.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Beavis || 03/11/2009 12:27 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Obama plan hits blue states hardest

Sympathy meter please.
Posted by: Besoeker || 03/11/2009 13:23 Comments || Top||

#2  The states most likely to profit are the ones that voted against him last November and whose congressional leaders are least likely to support it.

And he'll fix this by making a big chunk of the program an unfunded mandate, leading to tax hikes in those states.

So far, the pharmaceutical industry is on board with the reform effort, but if drug companies become the targets for price caps or similar efforts

These people are idiots. If this goes through, their profits will splash. Hard.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 03/11/2009 14:19 Comments || Top||

#3  We've Sympathy meter at 'Burg?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 03/11/2009 14:20 Comments || Top||

#4  Oxymoron alert. Obama+Plan= Null.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 03/11/2009 14:24 Comments || Top||

#5  TOPIX > ALAN REYNOLDS: IS CAPITALISM DEAD? YES. [USA steadily drifting towards SOCIALISM]/IS THIS CAPITALISM - NO, IT ISN'T CAPITALISM.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 03/11/2009 19:30 Comments || Top||

#6  Red states across the South, which now offer limited benefits to low-income residents, stand to receive billions of dollars to cover large populations of uninsured citizens. Blue states in the North and Midwest, which are wealthier and already offer insurance to many, are likely to take a financial hit.

And if you wanted to ruin or turn a 'red state', what better way to do it than this?
Posted by: Pappy || 03/11/2009 22:08 Comments || Top||


President Obama's clumsy, smirky staff is sinking him -- and resurrecting a deflated GOP!
Posted by: Besoeker || 03/11/2009 09:58 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I loved that woman since I've read about two stupid bitches fighting over a worthless sob.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 03/11/2009 14:09 Comments || Top||

#2  "They're not the White House staff members I thought I knew."

--President Obama, in the near future, announcing a few personnel changes.
Posted by: Mike || 03/11/2009 14:54 Comments || Top||


The Great Obama Vetting Disaster of 2009
Pejman Yousefzadeh, The New Ledger

During the 2008 campaign, it seemed whenever someone–anyone–demonstrated the temerity to question whether then-Senator Obama had the executive experience to be the President of the United States, such a question would be met with a chorus of disapproval and outrage on the part of Obamaphiles. After all, reasoned the future President’s ardent fans, the Obama campaign itself was a splendidly run operation and was a testament to Barack Obama’s executive management skills. Surely, running the country would not be that much more difficult.

We are reminded now that indeed it is. Verily, we are reminded that running the country is significantly more difficult than running a campaign.

2009 is the anti-2008 for Team Obama. Whereas, last year, the Obama campaign was able to demonstrate its supreme competence at running a campaign, raising money, and using technology to further Barack Obama’s political goals and personal ambitions, once Team Obama moved into the White House, it seemed that its hold on managerial competence disappeared. Thus, we have a Treasury Secretary whose tax delinquencies were not discovered by the Obama vetting system, and who is Home Alone at the Treasury Department because the White House can’t get its nominees confirmed quickly enough to provide the Treasury Secretary the personnel support he needs to deal with the greatest economic crisis since the recession of the early 1980s. The White House’s initial choice for HHS Secretary, Tom Daschle, was himself eliminated because of tax delinquencies. Because of the multiple problems with nominees running into tax problems, the responsibility for vetting over tax issues became concentrated in the White House Counsel’s Office . . . only to discover that White House Counsel Greg Craig has his own tax problems. Two Commerce Secretaries have been forced to withdraw their nominations. Only now is the Senate turning its attention to confirming the nomination of Ron Kirk as U.S. Trade Representative. And in the latest personnel snafu, the selection of Charles Freeman as the Chairman of the National Intelligence Counsel has been withdrawn....

The allegations against Freeman included claims that he was insensitive to the cause of Tibetan independence, having described Tibetan independence efforts as “race riots.” He described “Israeli violence against Palestinians” as the barrier to peace in the Middle East without acknowledging Palestinian violence against Israelis. Freeman’s stance on these issues may come as no surprise given that he was part of an institute that was funded by Saudi money and sat on the board of a Chinese state-owned oil company....consider Freeman’s statement in the wake of his withdrawal:

“The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East,” [Freeman] wrote.

“The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth.”

More on Freeman’s statement can be found here, in which he states that his critics are “clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government – in this case, the government of Israel.” Of course, Freeman is not the first to accuse supporters of Israel–whom many will identify simply as “Jews”–of having dual loyalties at best, or not being loyal to the United States at all, at worst. But Freeman had problems that went beyond his disagreements with the “Israel Lobby.” Senator Charles Schumer took up the fight against Freeman. Doubtless, Senator Schumer will be accused of being Jewish–guilty!–without Freeman defenders considering that perhaps, Freeman’s one-sided views on Mideast peace and China’s interactions with dissidents might have done more than the Israel Lobby ever could have done to cause Freeman’s withdrawal....

I suppose that it is worth exploring why it is that Charles Freeman believes that the Tibetan dispute with heavy-handed Chinese suppression tactics constitutes nothing more than a “race riot,” or why he thinks that the Chinese should have killed the protesters at Tienanmen Square faster, or why he seems to turn a blind eye to the practice of terrorist tactics against the Israeli people. Those issues can be examined, though perhaps with Freeman’s withdrawal from public service, that examination is not so pressing as it was when he was set to serve as chairman of the National Intelligence Council.

What is worth examining now is why President Obama felt the need to select a National Intelligence Council head whose views on Middle East peace are so one-sided and whose views on Chinese human rights abuses are simply devoid of any moral sensibility. Charles Freeman is praised as a foreign policy realist, but as a realist myself, it is hard for me to divine any homage to realism that is found in casually dismissing Tibetan dissidents or the pro-democracy demonstrators who were massacred at Tienanmen Square 20 years ago. Freeman is also praised as a provocateur who could have asked tough questions as the NIC Chairman, but while being a contrarian has its advantages, there is a difference between being a contrarian and being appallingly wrong on issues that could very well influence one’s views as the Chairman of the National Intelligence Council.

It was said of Barack Obama and his coterie that they were the very embodiment of competence. Now we see that the President and his White House are, in fact, exceedingly poor judges of personalities. Far too many appointment snafus have occurred to place much trust in this President’s ability to choose responsible and inspiring public servants to people his Administration....
Posted by: Mike || 03/11/2009 08:06 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  They've now left the Interstate Highway and are off on a gravel road. No wait! It's a dirt road with deep ruts. The kids are hungry and there is no Waffle House anywhere in sight!

Geez Leonuuurd, I think weez lost!
Posted by: Besoeker || 03/11/2009 8:51 Comments || Top||

#2  <<<< Now we see that the President and his White House are, in fact, exceedingly poor judges of personalities. >>>

We also now see that 53% of the voters at the last election were exceedingly poor judges of personalities as well. At least Freeman withdrew under a little bit of reasonable questioning. Its shameful that the MSM didn't apply even a modicum of the same degree of scrutiny. More evidence that pre-emptive strikes are indeed a useful devices to prevent later disasters. [Oh that was the Bush doctrine - we can't mention that]

Posted by: Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 || 03/11/2009 9:21 Comments || Top||

#3  We also now see that 53% of the voters at the last election were exceedingly poor judges of personalities as well.

Ah, some were. Some others, however, are the Freudian projection they have of 'dittoheads'. That is 'mindless automatons' with a visceral hatred of anything that would hint of nothing less than the socialist utopia. That would be about 20% of the electorate for whom 'judgement' doesn't even enter the process. It's the same mindset as radical Islam. The mind is closed.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 03/11/2009 9:35 Comments || Top||

#4  We also now see that 53% of the voters at the last election were exceedingly poor judges of personalities as well.

In the words of Derb "some want to get this business of Black president over with."
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 03/11/2009 9:37 Comments || Top||

#5  Obama has lived his life, and was able to run his campaign, inside a liberal echo chamber.

The "vetting disaster" is where their bubble interacts with the reality of the body politic. Their first reaction has been to lash out at opponents. As pressure mounts I predict that the adminstration's "us vs them" mentality will increase.
Posted by: DoDo || 03/11/2009 11:01 Comments || Top||

#6  I predict that the adminstration's "us vs them" mentality will increase.

Already happening. The attacks on Rush, the bringing in of the backdoor fairness doctrine, etc. Expect to see worse. A lot worse. They will push for Americans to be jailed, fined for "hate speech" for posting negative comments on Rantburg and the like.
Posted by: DarthVader || 03/11/2009 11:17 Comments || Top||

#7  Can a goy join this here jewish lobby? Sign me up!
Posted by: Dogsbody || 03/11/2009 11:31 Comments || Top||

#8 
Posted by: William Marcy Tweed || 03/11/2009 11:38 Comments || Top||

#9  William,
Anybody who thinks he gets an A hasn't been paying attention.
Posted by: Frozen Al || 03/11/2009 11:48 Comments || Top||

#10  This isn't completely the fault of stupid people. The MSM shares much, if not most of the blame.

Just watched Media Malpractice - How Obama Got Elected and Palin was Targetted. Nothing real suprising to any regulars of Rantburg.

Suprising was near the end where they did a poll of Obama voters and asked 'who controls congress' and something like 70% said 'the republicans'. Which clearly shows that the media is failing in its job to inform the public.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/11/2009 12:27 Comments || Top||

#11  Maybe Obama is deliberately putting up questionable candidates so that the firestorm is directed at these people rather than his multi-trillion dollar bills, which are pushed through without them even being read, let alone debated.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 03/11/2009 15:12 Comments || Top||

#12  Hasn't anyone considered the possibility that the nomination of Freeman is a brilliant red herring strategy by the One. Much as Harriet Meier's failed nomination made the way easier for Roberts, Freeman floated and shot down means Obama can now push for his real choice__ a long time friend he's worked with before and obviously feels very comfortable with and who has impeccable credentials with respect to his knowledge of terrorism___ Bill Ayres, of course.
Posted by: Daffy Threreting5234 || 03/11/2009 15:33 Comments || Top||

#13  The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired,

Same ol' playbook, with that 'unseen enemy.

Daffy may have a point...
Posted by: logi_cal || 03/11/2009 15:58 Comments || Top||

#14  It worked - Ogabe got his omnibus bill through. Does anyone know what's in the bill? No. Everyone knows Chas Freeman is the Saudi candidate, though. This is rope-a-dope for dummies. He shows us some unsuitable candidate for office, we make a big stink about his choice and his massive spending bills pass right under the radar while we're congratulating ourselves about deep-sixing his people. How stupid can we get?
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 03/11/2009 16:25 Comments || Top||

#15  That's a nice theory, guys, but almost nobody in the MSM actually covered it. The NYT's first mention of the existence of Chas Freeman was in reporting his withdrawal--because the NYT didn't think it important enough. Ditto for the WaPo. I don't think he made the TV news at all.
Posted by: Mike || 03/11/2009 16:39 Comments || Top||

#16  That's a nice theory, guys, but almost nobody in the MSM actually covered it.

That's even worse. Conservatives spent all this time and effort going after Freeman and nobody even knows. Meanwhile, another huge spending bill scoots in under the radar. This isn't a mere disaster - it's an epic disaster.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 03/11/2009 16:42 Comments || Top||

#17  What do I call this strategy? A series of pawn sacrifices.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 03/11/2009 16:53 Comments || Top||

#18  Chas Freeman did make the TV news yesterday when he quit. Either CNN or MSNBC, one of the Breaking News outfits, was blaring an announcement about it while I was waiting for a delayed flight at Dallas-Ft Worth airport yesterday afternoon.
Posted by: mom || 03/11/2009 22:18 Comments || Top||

#19  Can a goy join this here jewish lobby? Sign me up!

'Course you can, Dogsbody. Just convert to Judaism, marry a nice Jewish girl/boy as appropriate, or have a Jewish acquaintance. I'll probably do. Then, too, you know g(r)omgoru, and he's an honest-to-goodness Jewish Israeli, which only proves your nefariousness.
Posted by: trailing wife || 03/11/2009 23:31 Comments || Top||


Iowahawk: Give the gift of stuff
Dear Barry: Relationship advice from President Barack Obama - a taste...

Sometimes, though, the occasion calls for a gift with the warm "personal touch" that reflects the personality and tastes of the recipient. For example, my wife Michelle is very involved with fashion, fitness, and beauty, so for our 10th anniversary I gave her a Norelco heavy duty personal ear and nose hair groomer. Sure, it was expensive, but that glare of delight in her eyes was more than enough payback for the $89.95 price plus $20 for shipping and monogramming. When I sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to meet with a Russian delegation last week, she brought along a cute novelty "panic button" from Spencer Gifts that my staff relabeled with the Russian word for "Reset" as a humorous token of America's new gentler approach to diplomacy. Even though they pointed out the word actually translates as "Vaporize," the Russians still had a good laugh because I think they understood where we were coming from. It was such a hit that later this year when we meet with the Iranians we are planning to bring along a Big Mouth Billy Bass that sings "Don't Worry Be Happy" in Farsi. If there's anything I've learned about international relations, it is to bring a fun gift and leave the attitude and preconditions behind.
Posted by: Frank G || 03/11/2009 08:03 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I wonder how many "That was easy" Easy buttons from Staples Obama has on his desk? Probably none. That's why I am sending one to him. You may want to do the same for Geithner, Pelosi, Clinton, Reid, Barney Frank and Henry Waxman. They need those encouraging words as they destroy our system and values.
Posted by: Jack is Back! || 03/11/2009 10:17 Comments || Top||

#2  STUFF Magazine???

Well, iff they insist.....
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 03/11/2009 18:31 Comments || Top||


Home Front: WoT
The War Is Over
By Andrew C. McCarthy

The war is over. Our peerless armed forces took Tora Bora and, when we finally let them, Fallujah. But al-Qaeda won in Washington, and that has made all the difference.

The War on Terror has radically altered the compact between the American people and their government by dramatically changing the nature of the U.S. courts. Until this new, unaccountable monster is caged, it will continue to devour our political community's capacity to wage war and to defend itself.

And that caging had better happen soon, because the word "war" in this context refers only to our nation's forcible military response after the 9/11 attacks finally made the atrocities of radical Islam impossible to ignore any longer. Our response did not start the war. That war, radical Islam's jihad against the United States and the West, continues -- and ever more perilously. As we hollow ourselves out by the day, we become a much softer target.

Last Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit dealt a crushing blow to national defense. The three-judge panel's ruling in al Odah v. United States has gotten scarce media attention. Perhaps that's understandable: It's a mind-numbing technical dispute over "discovery" in litigation, vying for attention against the socializing of our economy and the consequent collapse of the stock market. But the discovery in question is the most vital kind, namely, that of classified national-defense information. What is in dispute is how much sensitive intelligence we must share with enemies bent on annihilating Americans -- enemies against whom the people's representatives have authorized, by overwhelming margins, the use of force. That is, these "petitioners" are the militants who -- along with al-Qaeda's hierarchy and affiliates -- use the intelligence we give them against the soldiers we have dispatched to fight the battles Congress has authorized, under the direction of a president whose first duty is the prosecution of the war.

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 || 03/11/2009 08:41 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I could believe the 9th Circus would come up with something like this, but I thought the 4th was relatively sane. Guess not.

Repeat after me - "non-national warriors, most often dressed in civilian clothes, conducting a war of terrorism and extortion for partisan political or religious goals, HAVE NO RIGHTS UNDER THE US CONSTITUTION." They are not covered by the Geneva Conventions, they are not US citizens (our Bill of Rights ONLY applies to US citizens and non-citizen legal residents), and they deserve any sh$$ we give them.

Judges are appointed and allowed to serve "under good behavior" until they retire. This is definitely NOT good behavior. It is the extension of US rights to those that don't have any respect for them, and aren't entitled to them. The judges that made this absolutely idiotic decision need to be fired - immediately.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 03/11/2009 15:26 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
After the Taliban Air Force, time to battle the Taliban Navy
With the recent revelation that the US administration has instructed GE to defer plans to operationalise engines for an Indian Navy frigate programme, it is time to look at how it is proceeding with plans to arm the Pakistan Navy with equipment that can only be utilised against India, writes Rajiv Singh.

Members of the US Congress have been sniggering for years about the funds being allocated to arm the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) with cutting-edge technology to fight what they refer to as the ''Taliban Air Force.'' Their sarcasm is aimed, in particular, at the number of contracts awarded to upgrade Lockheed Martin's Paki fighter- the F-16, which over the past decade of the Bush administration, has been equipped with the best, and most lethal, in sensors, munitions and equipment.

Of course, it is yet to participate in a single tactical operation against the Taliban, or any other entity.

For long, these funds have been allocated to Pakistan under the guise of helping it fight the Global War on Terror (GWOT). At one point of time questions began to be asked of the Bush administration if the contracts, funds and upgrades of the Paki F-16 were aimed only at shoring up Pakistani capabilities against India.

Now, with the great ''agent of change'' occupying the White House, and the majority Democrats in the Congress in love with everything he wants to do, the time has come for Indian parliamentarians, at least, to take cognizance of the way the Pakistan Navy (PN) intends to take on the ''Taliban Navy.''

Sometime in February this year, the Pakistan Navy was provided the clearance to acquire three types of anti-submarine warfare (ASW) sonobuoys - totaling 445 units - under the Foreign Military Sales programme. This piece of anti-submarine warfare equipment is of the same class as contracted for the US Navy.

Indeed, the contract signed with suppliers is a joint contract for the US and the Pakistan Navy.

The sale was cleared, presumably, even as the Obama administration was instructing General Electric not to operationalise two new LM 2500 gas turbines it has contracted to supply the Indian Navy for its state-of-the-art, indigenously designed, Project 17 stealth frigates.

The first of three frigates, INS Shivalik, is ready to commence sea trials but the programme will now have to go on hold – at least for a few months –with the Obama administration reviewing its military relations with a number of countries, including India.

Sonobuoys
What are sonobuoys? These are devices meant to detect, and identify, submarines as they move about stealthily in shallow or deep waters. Sonobuoys perform this task either in the 'passive' or 'active' mode. Other specialized ones measure temperature changes in the sea as a submarine passes by. This type is particularly useful in tracking nuclear powered submarines.

In the 'passive' mode the sonobuoy listens for sounds produced by propellers and machinery of a submarine, while in the 'active' mode it bounces a sonar ''ping'' off its body. Being buoys, they float in the water - at least some part of them does.

Apart from these basic versions, sonobuoys have also been designed to detect electric fields, magnetic anomalies, and bio-luminescence (light emitted by microscopic organisms disturbed by a passing submarine). Some also measure environmental parameters like water temperature versus depth, air temperature, barometric pressure, and wave height.

These are the specalised sonobuoys that are particularly useful in tracking nuclear-powered submarines, some of which India hopes to deploy in the near future –either leased Schucka/Akula class from Russia, or indigenously developed ones. The first of these will heading for the water soon for sea trials.

While passive sonobuoys use a hydrophone to listen for sound energy from a target, active sonobuoys use a transducer to send an acoustic signal and then listen for the return echo off an object.

Sonobuoys are generally dropped from aircraft or helicopters, which are equipped with electronic equipment to receive, and process, data sent by the sonobuoy. They can also be launched from ships.

A pattern of sonobuoys –passive, active and special - can be deployed to determine the exact location, and also, to actively track, and attack, a submerged target.

Threat from the Taliban Navy

What we need to look at is the threat perception of the Pakistan Navy, which, like the Pakistan Air Force, is now being supplied with the latest that the US can offer in the GWOT.

The PN likely faces naval threats from one or all of these sources:

* The Chinese Navy –Since the Chinese Navy is trying to make its presence felt in the Indian Ocean region, under the guise of fighting pirates in Somalia, it is only fitting that the Obama administration should arm the Pakistan Navy against any likely Chinese threat. It doesn't matter if the Chinese have also funded and built Pakistan's deep water port –Gwadar. It doesn't matter if China is Pakistan's strategic partner of long standing, and a country with which it shares perhaps a deeper strategic relationship than even with the United States.
* The US Navy – with the Bush, and lately, the Obama administration making it evident that they are quite pissed off with Islamabad because of its non-performance in the GWOT it is likely that at some point of time the Pakistan Navy may want to take on the US Navy. So, it needs to be armed for this eventuality.
* The Iranian Navy – The Iranians are a threat with their fleet of three Kilo class subs and some indigenously developed midget submarines. We need to keep in mind that never in its 60 years of history has Pakistan ever been threatened, or come under hostile scrutiny, from this Islamic country.
* Maldives, Oman, UAE, Saudi Arabia and other littoral entities –not known, if any of these nations are armed with submarines. They don't even have much of a conventional navy, and not likely they would like to waste their time attacking Pakistan, or anybody else for that matter.
* The Indian Navy – not likely that they are the target of such largesse. We know the friendly relations that the US and India maintain and for long the two countries have been speaking about striking up a strategic partnership. So, the chances that the US is arming the Pakistan Navy with such equipment as a foil to the Indian Navy are not very likely.
* The Taliban Navy – then, is the only likely hostile source. They have to be looked at with the utmost concern.

Anti-Taliban underwater hardware
Now, on to the menace that the PN faces from the Taliban Navy –which, as the world knows, is armed with a hugely sophisticated Navy. To battle Talibani cadres, who have been known to swim unaided from Karachi to Mumbai- clenching Kalashnikov's in their teeth and carrying Jihadi goodwill in their hearts – the US, very thoughtfully, has decided to arm the PN with the very latest in anti-submarine warfare technology.

It has already contracted for the supply of a large number of maritime reconnaissance and anti-submarine warfare (ASW) aircraft.

The contract envisages the sale of 45 AN/SSQ-36B, 50 AN/SSQ-62E and 350 AN/SSQ-53F sonobuoys to the Pakistan Navy – a total of 445 units.

How will these state-of-the-art sonobuoys help neutralise Taliban cadres, even as they comb and trim their beards underwater, and seek to destroy PN assets through deep breathing?

AN/SSQ-36B
Let's start with the AN/SSQ-36B Bathythermograph. This is a sonobuoy manufactured for the US Navy and provides vertical temperature profiles of the ocean layer for ASW purposes. So, as a submarine moves into an area its presence affects the temperature of the water around it and the bathythermograph will provide enough data to locate the lurking sub.

Basic capabilities include a 2625 feet (800 metre) temperature profile and the capability to select one VHF transmitter channel out of 99 available channels.

Thermistors located in the probe measures the changes in seawater temperature during the descent of a submarine from the surface. The data can be processed and displayed as a temperature versus depth comparison, which can be transmitted by radio frequency (RF) to the launch aircraft.

In the case of the Pakistan Navy this means they can hope to track Taliban cadre even as they dive to great depths under the sea to launch an attack on naval assets.

It will also help the PN, particularly, as it keeps track of Indian nuke subs –as, and when, they take to the waters.

The AN/SSQ-36B Bathythermograph can be launched from the air from fixed or rotary-wing aircraft as also from the deck of a vessel.

Unlike the previous class, the AN/SSQ-62E Directional Command Activated Sonobuoy System (DICASS) is the latest version of the active class of sonobuoys. The DICASS is a command activated sonobuoy, which, operating in tandem with a monitoring unit(s) signal processing equipment, can provide active sonar range, bearing, and Doppler information on a submarine.

The DICASS can select depth families - either shallow or deep. If the shallow family is selected, depth settings of 50, 150, or 300 feet are available. If the deep family is selected, depth settings of 90, 400, and 1500 are available. These depth options provide sufficient flexibility for both littoral and open ocean ASW operations.

Good news for everybody - no escape for the Taliban cadre, either in shallow or deep water.

AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
The AN/SSQ-53F Directional Frequency and Ranging (DIFAR) is the latest passive sonobuoy being produced for the US Navy.

The main component of each DIFAR is a directional hydrophone that gives bearings to where the acoustic signal originated. The DIFAR sonobuoy detects acoustic energy from 5 to 2,400 Hz and can operate for up to eight hours at depths of up to 1000 feet.

These sonobuoys have also been used for research to track whale populations and monitor underwater volcanic activity. In the case of the PN it can now track Jihadi war cries as they emanate from the depths of the sea.

Conclusion
The right of a nation to arm itself is a sovereign one and no objections can be taken on that score. What we need to look at is the reason why the US is persisting with its cold war strategy of propping up Pakistan militarily against India.
Posted by: john frum || 03/11/2009 06:22 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Goodbye Cricket, Hello Gulli Danda
by Kamran Shafi

First off, what did the poor, gentle, Sri Lankans do to deserve the treatment they got in Lahore at our hands?

I ask this question in the manner I do because right-wing pundits and the authorities can bury their heads in the sand and say that this country and its own people had nothing to do with the atrocity; I believe it was no one but Pakistanis who planned, trained for, and did the dastardly deed.

They were quite obviously cousins to the beheading brigade who have recently taken over Swat after defeating the much-vaunted Pakistan Army and the craven government of the ANP which did not stand its ground.

What was the Sri Lankans crime, anyway? The fact that their country was the only country in the whole wide world that came to Pakistans aid when West Pakistani forces were fighting that ill-fated and cruel battle to prevent East Pakistans secession so many tragic years ago? This question is asked specifically because our security establishment, even today, insists that the mindlessly cruel militants who rule almost all of the Frontier today are ‘patriots who will come to Pakistans aid if there is need to ward off Indian aggression!

What, more specially, was the Sri Lankan cricket teams fault? That they were the only cricket team in the whole wide world who were foolish enough to venture into the Land of the Pure, the frightening and horrendous place it has become? Really! We have more than proved the fact that we are a bunch of incompetents who have allowed yahoos to run riot in our country. ‘Yahoo is used here in the worst sense, described by Jonathan Swift in Gullivers Travels as a race of wild beings who are half beast and half man, and who have none of the finer instincts of (even) beasts.

And what of the security lapses that are so apparent from the CCTV and TV footage as filmed by a private TV station that overlooks Liberty Chowk, where the attack on our guests took place? Twelve or 14 terrorists, carrying huge backpacks, saunter on to the Liberty roundabout, before the team was to pass along there, and no one finds them before the teams bus arrives? Governor Taseer talks about SOPs being followed: is physically searching behind cover along a secured route, especially where a vehicle carrying a VVIP target has to slow down, not one of the most important SOPs ever?

The specifics now: The firing goes on for more than 25 minutes according to every report, yet not one terrorist is killed, not one disabled and captured. The Gulberg police station is located barely one hundred yards from the scene, yet not one policeman bestirs himself to saunter over and see what all the commotion is about, and in the process perhaps apprehend just one of the murderers? And the governor has the gall to say that Shahbaz Sharif himself did not tell him about the warning issued by the Punjab home department re: a possible attack on the Sri Lankans? I ask you!

It was nothing but a huge failure on the part of the present government, which failure will see Pakistan cricket die a quick and well-deserved death in this country. For look at the arrogant way in which the sport has been/is being run in the country. Just look at the ill-worded attack that the president of the PCB launched on Chris Broad, for Gods sake!

We are a very unique people; and for reasons best known only to ourselves we think the light shines out of our left ears and right nostrils. We are egotistical and conceited and simply will not face up to reality. Simply spoken, we do not deserve to play that game of gentlemen. Its gulli danda for us, friends.

And other such sports that are the rage in the Land of the Pure; the Citadel of Islam; the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Sports such as hanging recently slaughtered corpses from electric poles and learning which is the exact place in the human solar plexus where the notice ordering passers-by not to take down the dead body before such and such a time in the morning can be affixed with a dagger.

Sports such as dragging women teachers (who insist on teaching girl pupils) from their homes in the dead of night by the hair after putting dancing-girl bells on their ankles (to announce them as nautch girls) to the nearest square and then slaughtering them and hanging their bodies in the manner stated above. Who wants boring old cricket, when we have all of the above?

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Security Czar Rehman Malik tells us Pakistan is in a state of war. Truer words were not spoken, but Malik did not tell us who we were at war with. He did not tell us that we were at war with ourselves, destroying what little is left of our country because of self-service and sheer incompetence. He did not tell us that our failed security establishment is mainly to blame for the extremely dire straits we are in: witness the debacle in Swat and much of Fata where the Taliban now rule supreme.

On the very day that Czar Malik pronounced that Pakistan was at war, the GOP told us the Mobile Courts Ordinance was issued during the sitting of parliament because neither the president, nor the law minister, nor the parliamentary affairs minister was aware that the National Assembly was in session! I ask you.

And amidst all of this, the PPP is doing to the PML-N in the Punjab in 2009 what Musharraf did to the PPP in Sindh in 2002: steal its majority in the provincial assembly and form its own government made up of odds and ends, even the ‘Qatil League. In an article of a few weeks ago I had asked to what avail had the PPP allowed the loud and in-your-face and adolescent Salman Taseer his shenanigans? For they will only bring grief to the party, and to those that sail in her.

I end with quoting from Taseers promoter, the Commando, who during his present visit to India has said he is quite willing to take over Pakistans presidency once more, if he is asked nicely. The man has brass of a very special kind, indeed.
Posted by: john frum || 03/11/2009 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  ‘Yahoo is used here in the worst sense, described by Jonathan Swift in Gullivers Travels as a race of wild beings who are half beast and half man, and who have none of the finer instincts of (even) beasts.

Someone gets it... too bad he's got such a short life expectancy....
Posted by: Kofi Glavising1975 || 03/11/2009 15:40 Comments || Top||


In Pakistan, visions of khaki
Nirupama Subramanian
Two years after the initial removal Iftikhar Chaudhary as chief justice of Pakistan, the demand for his restoration is not only alive, but has come together with Supreme Court disqualification of Nawaz Sharif in a way that is threatening the future of President Asif Ali Zardari and his Pakistan People's Party-led government. It has even given rise to speculation about what Pakistanis, after year of living under military rule, politely describe as a "khaki intervention."

The disqualification of Mr. Sharif and his brother Shahbaz, both leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League (N), President Zardari's subsequent ill-advised decision to dismiss the PML(N) government in Punjab, and the lawyers' demand for the restoration of the deposed Mr. Chaudhary have placed Mr. Zardari, the PPP, and its government in a tight political corner.

It was on March 9, 2007 that former President Pervez Musharraf first removed Mr. Chaudhary, setting off a chain of events that eventually saw off the military ruler in August 2008. Mr. Zardari has steadfastly refused to restore the former chief justice to the Supreme Court, which is at present headed by a Musharraf-appointee.

Contrary to the PPP's hopes, the issue of restoration refused to fade out of the national discourse. Instead, it became the main source of tension between Mr. Zardari and the Sharifs in the last eight months.

Since the Sharifs' disqualification by what they described as a "bogus court" with "bogus judges," the PML(N), which has launched an all-out war on President Zardari, has decided to throw its weight behind a "long march" on the capital by lawyers to demand the restoration of Mr. Chaudhary. The procession will set out from Lahore on March 15, and aims to reach Islamabad the next day.

"We want a judiciary that is not pliable, that does not fear the government and the military, which fears only god," said Shahbaz Sharif.

Other parties that will take part in the march are the Jamat-i-Islami and the Imran Khan-led Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf. Political activists, lawyers and civil society activists have thrown themselves into mobilisation efforts to make it "the longest march". Their plan, upon reaching Islamabad, is to stage a sit-in until their demand is met.

But despite assurances from the lawyers that their protest will be peaceful march, fears are it could turn ugly, especially if attempts are made to storm the barricades around the presidency, parliament and the Supreme Court. Should such a situation arise, and if there is a perception that the government can no longer control it, several commentators are saying a "khaki intervention" would become inevitable.

The speculation ranges from a full-scale martial law to some kind of "soft" intervention, with Zardari loyalists accusing Mr. Sharif of trying to deliberately push the situation to the brink on the gamble that this will bring in "the boots" and open the way for his own return to power, possibly through a mid-term election.

Interior Ministry boss Rehman Malik hinted at this when he accused the Sharifs of not having the patience to wait it out in the opposition.

"Some people want to come to power by any means, even if it is through the Bangladesh-model," he said at a press conference on Monday, bringing out into the open the talk behind closed doors.

He was referring to the 2007 military-intervention in Bangladesh following widespread violence in the country. It led to the installation of a caretaker government that conducted the 2008 elections. Many analysts in Pakistan believe that this is the model that their army will follow in case it intervenes.

There is little doubt that Mr. Zardari and the PPP own a large share of the responsibility for the present political turmoil. The move of dismissing the PML(N) government in Punjab in undue haste after Shahbaz Sharif had to step down as chief minister following his disqualification was an especially transparent ploy to grab power in the country's largest and politically most important province. But it was misjudged. Having gone for broke, the PPP realised it could not put together enough numbers to form an alternate provincial government.

Mr. Zardari then tried to reverse his way out of a difficult political situation. Working through the Awami National Party leader Asfnadyar wali Khan and Jamiat-e-Ulema Islami leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the PPP leader sent reconciliatory messages to the Sharifs. He reportedly offered a promise that the Governor's rule in Punjab province would be lifted, and the federal government would file a review petition in the Supreme Court against the Sharifs' disqualification.

In these efforts, some already detected the firm guiding hand of the Pakistan Army, which is said to be keen that political stability is restored in the country. In a signed article titled "The Power of Winks and Messages," the editor of The News, Shaheen Sehbai, wrote that a "subtle intervention by the khakis" spurred the PPP's attempts to reach out to the PML(N).

But Nawaz Sharif, pronouncing Mr. Zardari "untrustworthy" for failing to keep previous promises, has reportedly refused to budge from two pre-conditions as the bottom line for any agreement: remove Governor's rule in Punjab; restore the deposed chief justice.

The reconciliation efforts appeared to have failed, as evident from statements by a senior PPP cabinet that there would be no more negotiations as the Sharifs had refused to come off the path of "confrontation." Yet again, Pakistan is bracing for the unknown in the coming days.

"The army is incapable of providing political solutions. But if [the army steps in], this time too the politicians would be to blame," the Daily Times said in an editorial on Tuesday.

It is tempting to think that Pakistan may have been a different place today had it not been for Mr. Zardari's determination to keep Mr. Chaudhary out of the Supreme Court. It is widely held that his resistance to the deposed chief justice's return was born out of fear that corruption cases against him would be reopened.

Had Mr. Zardari restored him, if nothing else, he would have certainly been a more popular President than he is now, and that by itself would have given him enough capital to deal with both political and non-political foes. Now there is little sympathy for him.

Even within his own party, the discontent is evident. Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani told Parliament he did not agree with Governor's rule in Punjab, the latest in moves by him to assert his independence over President Zardari. The sidelining of the veteran PPP leader Raza Rabbani has caused more bad blood in the party.

A week, as they say, is a long time in politics. The fast-deteriorating situation may yet be salvaged before it spins completely out of control. Frantic diplomatic efforts are also on to save the day. Envoys of the U.S., the U .K., and even Australia are actively keeping up the pressure on both sides to row back before March 15. Expect some change in Pakistan in the next few days, for the better or for the worse.
Posted by: Fred || 03/11/2009 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan

#1  The Lawyers are marching? Quick, load all machine guns. Block their route, leave no Lawyer standing.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 03/11/2009 14:07 Comments || Top||


Saving Pakistan from itself
K. SHANKAR BAJPAI
Alarming as Pakistan's spreading Talibanisation is, it is even more difficult to discern encouraging ways to counter it. Pakistanis, who ultimately must develop these, and the one outsider capable of influencing affairs evidently consider a civilian-faced army regime their best (looking) bet. Undeniable, but the army is also the cause of Pakistan's problems.

No recrimination intended: the army has some of the ablest and balanced men in Pakistan, but formed in an atmosphere of implacable antagonism to India and contempt for civilian rule. One army element, at least, has developed religious extremists as its most effective instrument against both domestic politicians and India.

It is a Wild West custom for the sheriff to co-opt the gunslinger to catch outlaws -- and "Af-Pak" is the Wild West writ large. But the gunslinger must become wholly law-abiding -- not try getting away, as he has since 9/11, with helping against some outlaws while collaborating with others.

It is simply not possible, in any foreseeable future, for a civilian Government to control Pakistan. Brave individuals -- and newspapers -- urging civil society and the rule of law cannot constitute a credible popular movement for democracy. While failing to establish a form of government, Pakistan has been managed by a governing class, controlling both civilian and military forces, using fundamentalists in their internal power struggles. Has the ruling class realised that its erstwhile creatures are about to devour it? And can the army change its thinking? Given the consequences for us, even the most unlikely possibility needs consideration.
Posted by: Fred || 03/11/2009 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan


Iraq
Bovine Excrement Alert: Obama’s Manufactured Troop Withdrawal
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 03/11/2009 17:04 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Warning: Hip Waders required.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/11/2009 17:22 Comments || Top||

#2  From the 'About' page.....

The Enemy

We identify "Corporate Global Empire" as our common foe and the enemy of the people. We believe that all current, viable political parties in the U.S. are in service to the empire and do not represent the people. We are not to be identified as "Democrats", "Republicans", "Capitalists", "Communists" or "Socialists", "Progressives" or with any label that can be reduced to a religion, organization or any other "ism". We offer no such target for attack by the enemies of the truth.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/11/2009 17:59 Comments || Top||

#3  Ghali Hassan is an independent writer living in Australia.

Imagine that.
Posted by: Lftbhndagn || 03/11/2009 18:55 Comments || Top||

#4  but he also shows that U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East is not determined by the White House. It is determined by a collection of politically and financially powerful anti-Arab/anti-Muslim Zionists, including the pro-Israel Jewish lobby

I knew it! I knew it! I knew it! I knew it! Thank you Ghali. Thank you so much.
Posted by: Besoeker || 03/11/2009 19:21 Comments || Top||

#5  An amazing piece of writing. Truly the product of an exceptionally addled brain. I was looking for a reference to Spike Milligan in the credits, but alas, no. The author must have broken into the office at the sheltered workshop and borrowed the computer for a time. Obviously there was a deal of plagiarization. The following quotes were obviously stolen from conservative blogs and in place of the references to the economy, the writer used references to the Iraq war.

<<< Today, many people start to feel disappointed over Obama's failure to match his words with deeds. >>>

<<< Obama’s real colour starts to appear and he has shown that he is just a creation of the white American ruling class.>>>>

<<<< In other words, the Occupation will continue, justified by lies and deception. Obama’s aim is simply to deceive the public and justify an ongoing colonial Occupation, by renegotiating “agreement” with an illegitimate weak puppet government.>>>>

<<<< Obama, the President, proved to be an opportunist capable of betraying millions of people who voted against violent imperialism.>>>>

But I am mostly and deeply perterbed by the notion that Obama seems to excite the same response in such an addled brain, as in much of the conservative and even centerist economic commentators around the world.

What is the world coming to?


Posted by: Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 || 03/11/2009 20:03 Comments || Top||


Home Front Economy
A Turning Tide?
Quite a good offering by Howard Fineman although he deflects a little. The list of problems is the highlight, not Howard's own take.
Surfer that he is, President Obama should know a riptide when he's in one. The center usually is the safest, most productive place in politics, but perhaps not now, not in a once-in-a-century economic crisis.

Swimming in the middle, he's denounced as a socialist by conservatives, criticized as a polite accommodationist by government-is-the-answer liberals, and increasingly, dismissed as being in over his head by technocrats.

Luckily for Obama, the public still likes and trusts him, at least judging by the latest polls, including NEWSWEEK's. But, in ways both large and small, what's left of the American establishment is taking his measure and, with surprising swiftness, they are finding him lacking.
In the face of such obvious failures I don't know why it should be surprising.
They have some reasons to be concerned. I trace them to a central trait of the president's character: he's not really an in-your-face guy. By recent standards--and that includes Bill Clinton as well as George Bush--Obama for the most part is seeking to govern from the left, looking to solidify and rely on his own party more than woo Republicans. And yet he is by temperament judicious, even judicial. He'd have made a fine judge. But we don't need a judge. We need a blunt-spoken coach.
No I think we need someone who knows what's going on and is capable of doing the job.
Obama may be mistaking motion for progress, calling signals for a game plan. A busy, industrious overachiever, he likes to check off boxes on a long to-do list. A genial, amenable guy, he likes to appeal to every constituency, or at least not write off any. A beau ideal of Harvard Law, he can't wait to tackle extra-credit answers on the exam.

But there is only one question on this great test of American fate: can he lead us away from plunging into another Depression?

If the establishment still has power, it is a three-sided force, churning from inside the Beltway, from Manhattan-based media and from what remains of corporate America. Much of what they are saying is contradictory, but all of it is focused on the president:

* The $787 billion stimulus, gargantuan as it was, was in fact too small and not aimed clearly enough at only immediate job-creation.
* The $275 billion home-mortgage-refinancing plan, assembled by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, is too complex and indirect.
* The president gave up the moral high ground on spending not so much with the "stim" but with the $400 billion supplemental spending bill, larded as it was with 9,000 earmarks.
* The administration is throwing good money after bad in at least two cases--the sinkhole that is Citigroup (there are many healthy banks) and General Motors (they deserve what they get).
* The failure to call for genuine sacrifice on the part of all Americans, despite the rhetorical claim that everyone would have to "give up" something.
* A willingness to give too much leeway to Congress to handle crucial details, from the stim to the vague promise to "reform" medical care without stating what costs could be cut.
* A 2010 budget that tries to do far too much, with way too rosy predictions on future revenues and growth of the economy. This led those who fear we are about to go over Niagara Falls to deride Obama as a paddler who'd rather redesign the canoe.
* A treasury secretary who has been ridiculed on "Saturday Night Live" and compared to Doogie Howser, Barney Fife and Macaulay Culkin in "Home Alone"--and those are the nice ones.
* A seeming paralysis in the face of the banking crisis: unwilling to nationalize banks, yet unable to figure out how to handle toxic assets in another way--by, say, setting up a "bad bank" catch basin.
* A seeming reluctance to seek punishing prosecutions of the malefactors of the last 15 years--and even considering a plea bargain for Bernie Madoff, the poster thief who stole from charities and Nobel laureates and all the grandparents of Boca. Yes, prosecutors are in charge, but the president is entitled--some would say required--to demand harsh justice.
* The president, known for his eloquence and attention to detail, seemingly unwilling or unable to patiently, carefully explain how the world works--or more important, how it failed. Using FDR's fireside chats as a model, Obama needs to explain the banking system in laymen's terms. An ongoing seminar would be great.
There is of course a minor problem here. He hasn't a clue how the economy or the wheels or creativity and production operate. He has never heard of Adam Smith's "Invisible Hand" or has no concept of Keynsian "animal spirits". In addition I don't think he would be comfortable in a fireside chat environment. He would need a cast of thousands, a teleprompter, a few greek columns and Nancy Pelosi standing behind him clapping like a demented barbie doll.
* Obama is no socialist, but critics argue that now is not the time for costly, upfront spending on social engineering in health care, energy or education.

No socialist?! Let's try "redistributor" "spreader of the wealth" [as in an agricultural manure spreader] "big government appropriator"
Other than all that,
I suspect Howard is attempting humor here
in the eyes of the big shots, he is doing fine. The American people remain on his side, but he has to be careful that the gathering judgment of the Bigs doesn't trickle down to the rest of us.
"trickle" = losing one's job, losing one's house, paying more for power when the carbon caps come in, finding that the buying power of the US$ falls as inflation kicks in, finding that the fixed income won't go so far, finding out that centralized healthcare doesn't work, finding that the oceans keep rising, finding that cancer is not immediatly cured. Yep, there will be a trickle and it won't be a Chris Matthews type trickle/tingle. It will be a veritable flood of biblical proportions.

One thing. Its an achievement to have created this litany of doubts and woes in less than 6 weeks.
Posted by: Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 || 03/11/2009 11:55 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Luckily for Obama, the public still likes and trusts him, at least judging by the latest polls, including NEWSWEEK's

NEWSWEEK eh? Oh well that settles it.
Posted by: Besoeker || 03/11/2009 13:21 Comments || Top||

#2  The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 37% of the nation’s voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-one percent (31%) now Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of +6, his lowest rating to date ... Currently, the baseline targets for the adult population are 41.1% Democrats, 33.0% Republicans, and 25.9% unaffiliated.

A Presidential Approval Index rating from +27 to +6 in only 7 weeks. Can't wait for the next 200 weeks.
Posted by: ed || 03/11/2009 14:57 Comments || Top||

#3  two mutually exlusive informal polls:

MSNBC (aka Obama is the One) 58% gave him an F
CNN (WE aren't biased) 59% Good or Excellent

odd.
Posted by: Whack Panda5941 || 03/11/2009 15:28 Comments || Top||

#4  odd

Not if you use the prestigious Lancet statistical study variance of 2000% error.

losing one's job, losing one's house,...

..losing one's girlfriend, losing one's truck, losing one's dog. Man, am I living at the time of Country Music's golden renaissance?
Posted by: Procopius2k || 03/11/2009 19:37 Comments || Top||

#5  I trace them to a central trait of the president's character: he's not really an in-your-face guy.

He's left that to his underlings, hired guns, sycophants and the media.

But I repeat myself.
Posted by: Pappy || 03/11/2009 21:59 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Behind the Cell Curve
By Kathleen Parker

WASHINGTON -- As he lifted the ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research Monday, President Barack Obama proclaimed that scientific decisions now will be made "on facts, not ideology."

This sounds good, but what if there were other nonideological facts that Obama seems to be ignoring? One fact is that since Obama began running for president, researchers have made some rather amazing strides in alternative stem cell research.

Unfortunately, the stem cell debate has been characterized as a conflict between science (as though science is always right) and religious "kooks" (as though religious folk are never right). In choosing sides, it is, indeed, easier to imagine lunch with a researcher who wants to resurrect Christopher Reeve (whom Obama couldn't resist mentioning) and make him walk again, than with the corner protester holding a fetus in a jar.

Moreover, as Obama said, the majority of Americans have reached a consensus that we should pursue this research. Polling confirms as much, but most Americans, including most journalists and politicians, aren't fluent in stem cell research. It's complicated. If people "know" anything, it is that embryonic stem cells can cure diseases and that all stem cells come from fertility clinic embryos that will be discarded anyway. Neither belief is entirely true.

In fact, every single one of the successes in treating patients with stem cells thus far -- for spinal cord injuries and multiple sclerosis, for example -- have involved adult or umbilical cord blood stem cells, not embryonic. And though federal dollars still won't directly fund embryo destruction, federally funded researchers can obtain embryos privately created only for experimentation. Thus, taxpayers now are incentivizing a market for embryo creation and destruction.

The insistence on using embryonic stem cells always rested on the argument that they were pluripotent, capable of becoming any kind of cell. That superior claim no longer can be made with the spectacular discovery in 2007 of "induced pluripotent stem cells" (iPS), which was the laboratory equivalent of the airplane. Very simply, iPS cells can be produced from a skin cell by injecting genes that force it to revert to its primitive "blank slate" form with all the same pluripotent capabilities of embryonic stem cells.

But "induced pluripotent stem cells" doesn't trip easily off the tongue, nor have any celebrities stepped forward to expound their virtues. (If only Angelina Jolie would purse those pouty lips and say "pluripotent.") Even without such drama, Time magazine named iPS innovation No. 1 on its "Top 10 Scientific Discoveries" of 2007, and the journal Science rated it the No. 1 breakthrough of 2008.

The iPS discovery even prompted Dr. Ian Wilmut, who cloned Dolly the sheep, to abandon his license to attempt human cloning, saying that the researchers "may have achieved what no politician could: an end to the embryonic stem cell debate." And, just several days ago, Dr. Bernadine Healy, director of the National Institutes of Health under the first President Bush, wrote in U.S. News & World Report that these recent developments "reinforced the notion that embryonic stem cells ... are obsolete."

Many scientists, of course, want to conduct embryonic stem cell research, as they have and always could with private funding. One may agree or disagree with their purposes, but one may also question why taxpayers should have to fund something so ethically charged when alternative methods are available.

Next comes a move to lift the unfortunately named Dickey-Wicker amendment in Congress, which prohibits using tax dollars to create human embryos for research purposes. If the amendment is rescinded, then human embryos can be created and destroyed with federal tax dollars.

Good people can disagree on these things, but those who insist that this is "only about abortion" miss the point. The objectification of human life is never a trivial matter. And determining what role government plays in that objectification may be the ethical dilemma of the century.

In this case, science handed Obama a gift -- and he sent it back.
The stem cell debate has been a classic case of misinformation. After Obama revoked the Bush regulation preventing federal funding the other day there were the usual headlines which painted a significantly different picture from those in the field who pay attention. There have been a few excellent essays on the complexity of the ethical debate which has been completely lost in the general discussion. It is a debate which exercises the minds of serious ethicists as distinct from bomb throwing luddites. But the unwillingness of the MSM to characterize any recognition of the existence of various reasonable and conflicting viewpoints is more evidence of the endemic and shallow discourse for which it stands roundly condemned. In short the proposition that ideology has no place in science is fanciful nonsense. Was the Manhattan Project science without ideology or was it informed by an ideological position which sustained it? These are weighty subjects and deserve the attention of great minds. Sean Penn et al need not apply.
Posted by: Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 || 03/11/2009 09:56 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The worst of this is that this won't stop the embryonic folks from getting all the money.

We've all noted how AGW gets all the grants even though there's lots of competing theories.

I've read something that makes me think that scientists, with the advent of government largess, have become a herd of money grubbers no matter what the branch. To whit from the theoretical physicist Lee Smolin:
String theory has such a dominant position in the academy that it is practically career suicide for young theoretical physicists not to join the field. Even in areas where string theory makes no predictions, like cosmology and particle phenomenology, it is common for researchers to begin talks and papers by asserting a belief that their work will be derivable from string theory sometime in the future

The point that Smolin is making is that, despite string theory being no theory at all but more of a hunch (as put by one of its strongest PROPONENTS, Nobel Laureate David Gross) "We don't know what we are talking about...We are missing perhaps something absolutely fundamental." all the money and all the resources are going to string theory alone and younger scientists are being coerced into touting the party line.

Smolin likens this to an emotional rather than analytical response. I'd say religious, just like the Gaia worshippers.

My point is that all sciences are being corrupted by our grant processes so that none of them are safe and as a result, in this case, the meme of embryonic stem cells will continue to be dominant regardless of things like iPS.


Quotes from the introduction of "The Trouble with Physics" by Lee Smolin.
Posted by: AlanC || 03/11/2009 15:21 Comments || Top||


Home Front Economy
Obama's Gamble
By Tony Blankley

Many of the media are following the convention of assessing President Barack Obama's first 100 days in office. The term first was applied to new American presidents during Franklin Roosevelt's spring of 1933, when, between March and June, he proposed and Congress passed unprecedented federal programs: the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the National Industrial Recovery Act, the Securities Act, the Banking Act and others.

But Obama may wish to note that the term "100 days" derives from Napoleon's escape from Elba in March 1815, his brilliant reforming of an army, his march through France, and his final defeat by the British and the Prussians at Waterloo. It's up in the air which precedent will apply to Obama.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 || 03/11/2009 09:03 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  You don;t need a poll to see a forking Moron.
Way out of his depth, and floundering.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 03/11/2009 13:05 Comments || Top||

#2  There are 2 issues here.

What to do about about the gazillion $ in derivatives?

Answer = Nothing.

Everyone who bought or sold these needs to lose every penny. When they do, those with even small amounts of capital left will clean up by buying much cheaper assets and much cheaper goods and services.

2. Obama is using the crisis is using the crisis as a means of advancing his ideological agenda. All politicians do this. It's just he has got access to a much bigger bucket of money than usual and his agenda is unsually extreme.

And he is surrounded by people who know that point 1 will financial wipe out everyone they know.

In summary, letting the derivatives tsunmai happen will devastate what Americans might call the blue state ruling classes, and leave small business people and the working middle class in control for a generation.
Posted by: phil_b || 03/11/2009 20:39 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Lileks: the Future of Newsmagazines
...I think the last time I looked at a newsmagazine, it was full of things that were Generally Wrong or Growing Concerns or Worrisome Trends, with lots of ads for acid-reflux pills. The default mode of these magazines a long time ago seemed to be banging the tocsin with a bloody shirt, to horribly mix metaphors, and it’s not surprising; the default position of journalism is reminding us how far we live from the fabled borders of Utopia, and how we might speed the journey through the magic accelerating powers of wise, targeted legislation.

I interviewed a Famous Columnist once who trotted out the “comfort the afflicted, afflict the comfortable” line - he was quite comfortable himself, which made you wonder if he went home and pinched himself until bloody half-moons appeared on his forearms - and he said he had a deep-seated need to throw snowballs at the guys with top hats. So . . . you’re a 30s urchin in Brooklyn?

At heart, probably. G’wan, ya swell! Go eat sum oysters, why doncha? First he writes the story about scrappy urchins who throw snowballs at top hats; the next year the style section writes about the decline in top-hat popularity, because of the snowball problem - which is understandable, given income inequality, and really, they are a bit passe - and the next year the columnist writes a story about the guys who are out of work because the top-hat factory closed. Meanwhile, the business section has a big story on a new straw-boater factory. But it’s the columnist grousing about the factory closing that people remember.

You can’t avoid being tagged as habitual downers when you’re in the news business, because the Truth Hurts, or at least Hurts Someone Else - but sometimes I suspect many people in the news business are temperamentally predisposed to miserabilism, because the idea of an unjust world run by monied smileys explains why the cheerleader turned them down for a date in high school. But I know too many who don’t fit that mold. So ignore the above, except when it seems to explain something. Except when you read someone who seems to think that by afflicting the comfortable, the afflicted are automatically comforted. As if writing is charity.
Posted by: Mike || 03/11/2009 06:43 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The downfall of the print journalism business, especially those smug, condescending, vitriolic, agenda driven newspapers and magazines can't happen fast enough for me. I have no sympathy for any of the reporters, even the sports guys (since most of them are failed pundits and no less about sports then they do about writing). Between satellite TV, internet and radio why do we need ground breaking investigative journalism that is actually just enabling a leftist point of view while appearing to be unbiased. Perhaps there downfall will also tip the dominoes at the end of the spectrum - academics. Now that is a diminishment I can get excited about.
Posted by: Jack is Back! || 03/11/2009 10:05 Comments || Top||

#2  The title is an oxymoron.
Posted by: DoDo || 03/11/2009 12:21 Comments || Top||


Home Front Economy
Who's Obama Kidding?
In 2007, the federal budget deficit was $162 billion (1.2% of gross domestic product). For 2009, the budget deficit is projected to be 11 times larger: $1.752 trillion.

This World War II-like deficit (12.3% of GDP) is not all on President Obama. Much of it is due to policies put in place by President Bush, Hank Paulson and last year's Congress. President Obama's "stimulus" bill will certainly raise the deficit, but, to be fair, it is not the predominant digger of this year's large fiscal hole.

Nonetheless, contrary to the spin of big-government types, these deficits are not just temporary. In fact, the Obama administration uses every trick in the book to convert an understandable and potentially temporary budget lapse this year into a structural lack of fiscal responsibility.

Despite the rosiest economic projections we have possibly ever seen, as well as one of the largest tax hikes in history, President Obama's budget fails to achieve balance at any time in the next decade. The smallest deficit (at least as far as the eye can see) will be $533 billion in 2013. This is amazing, especially when the economic growth forecast is considered. Team Obama suggests that real GDP will grow significantly faster in the years ahead than it has in the past.

To top it off, that $533 billion deficit in 2013 assumes we have largely withdrawn our military from Iraq. In other words, if we look at just domestic spending, the budget deficit is growing even more rapidly.

It is impossible to blame tax cuts for this situation. By 2013, the Bush tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 would no longer be in place. In the Obama budget, tax revenue is expected to be 19% of GDP in 2013--a higher share of GDP than in 2007. It doesn't take a rocket scientist at this point to understand that every dime of the increase in the deficit between 2007 and 2013 is due to higher spending, not excessively low taxes on the rich.

One thing to remember about all of these numbers is that they are based on a very "rosy" economic scenario. If the economy falls short of the optimistic assumptions, the deficit will be substantially larger than projected.

The forecast is rosy from the get-go. The budget forecasters assumed that the economy would grow at a 3% annual rate starting in April and that real GDP would fall just 1.2% in 2009 from 2008. Then, from 2010 through 2013, the administration assumes that real GDP will grow at a 4% annual rate. To put this in perspective, that is twice as fast as the economy's 2% annual rate of growth between 2004 and 2008. This is not impossible, but the only other periods that came close to this 4% growth rate for such a prolonged period of time were in the late-1990s and mid-1980s. Forgive us for pointing this out, but both of these periods followed major shifts toward freer markets and tax cuts, not bigger government and tax hikes.

There is no period in U.S. history where tax rates and the size of government both increased, and yet real GDP growth accelerated as sharply as the Obama team forecasts.

If real GDP grows 1% slower on an annual basis, federal spending would be 23% of GDP in 2013, not 22%. The last time government spending was anywhere near this level, was in 1982-1983, in the wake of the worst recession in post-war history, with unemployment at 9.7%. But by 2013, according to the Obama forecast, the U.S. will be in the fourth year of recovery, with an unemployment rate at 5.2%.

In other words, it is the Obama team's shift to an expanded government role in the economy and society that is boosting spending, not just spending to stimulate the economy. Deficits will remain extremely large because spending is so much above any historical ability of the economy to pay for it. And the more taxes are lifted to pay for it, the slower the economy will grow, and the less likely any economic data even remotely resembling the Obama Administration's rosy scenario will come to pass.
At this point, according to the Chairman of the Senate Budget committee there are insufficient votes to get a bill through the Senate. It will be very interesting to see if enough Senators hold the line on this. If they do, we shall see how politically adept Obama really is. Will he back off and admit again "I screwed up"? Will he try and paint it into some higher enlightenment? Or will it dissolve into allegations of partisanship, another road tour and some more straw men? This is just a massive fraud. A ponzi scheme of unparallelled proportions.
Posted by: Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794 || 03/11/2009 00:50 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:



Who's in the News
56[untagged]
6Govt of Pakistan
5Hamas
4Govt of Sudan
3Govt of Iran
2Hezbollah
2Govt of Syria
2Global Jihad
1Lashkar e-Taiba
1Taliban
1al-Qaeda in Iraq
1al-Qaeda
1Iraqi Baath Party

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Wed 2009-03-11
  Boomer near Sri Lanka mosque kills 15
Tue 2009-03-10
  33 dead as Iraq tribal leaders attacked
Mon 2009-03-09
  Iraq suicide bomber kills 30, wounds 57
Sun 2009-03-08
  Palestinian PM submits resignation making way for unity govt
Sat 2009-03-07
  US taps Delhi on Lanka foray: Marines to evacuate civilians
Fri 2009-03-06
  Marwan to be 'freed' as part of Shalit deal
Thu 2009-03-05
  ICC issues arrest warrant for Sudan's president-for-life
Wed 2009-03-04
  Lanka troops in last Tamil Tiger Towne
Tue 2009-03-03
  Lanka cricketers shot up in Lahore
Mon 2009-03-02
  Hariri tribunal gets underway in The Hague
Sun 2009-03-01
  Mighty Pak Army claims famous victory in Bajaur
Sat 2009-02-28
  Bangla sepoy mutiny: Mass grave horror stuns nation
Fri 2009-02-27
  Paleofactions agree to form unity govt
Thu 2009-02-26
  Bangla: At least 50 feared dead in sepoy mutiny
Wed 2009-02-25
  Lanka: Troops enter last Tamil Tiger-controlled town
Tue 2009-02-24
  Mulla Omar orders halt to attacks on Pak troops


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
3.133.146.143
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (10)    WoT Background (28)    Non-WoT (25)    (0)    Politix (5)